The Endlessly Morphing Marxist Narrative

 

Marxism must constantly criticize itself to create new revised versions of itself, yet at its core it retains the same DNA:

As I stated in my previous blog/vodcast, Communism exists on a spectrum which is dependant upon installing itself gradually. It can be identified by how each step challenges normalcy. Cultural Marxism's greatest success has been to normalize deviant behaviour while vilifying competence and productivity. The Frankfurt School of Cultural Marxism created a narrative fit only for miserable people who demand that we partake in equal shares of their misery. If we refuse, they label us as intolerant, bigoted, or even Nazis. Cultural Marxism appeals to the darkest elements of the human heart - egoism, nihilism, hatred, resentment, and anger. All for the glory of a utopian vision of humanity that has never existed because it cannot exist. The result of this grievance enterprise stands as a living testament to this fact.

The reason that Cultural Marxist Critical Theory is so hard to pin down is that it's like trying to nail philosophical Jello to an endlessly morphing narrative of how to reengineer humanity based upon resentment. This even though the Cultural Marxist vision for society repeatedly fails due to its refusal to recognize the fundamentally immutable nature of humanity. Only a lazy, unproductive, unwashed, malcontent like Karl Marx who lived off the largesse of others could have invented a doctrine that demands that those who produce nothing but an endlessly devolving grievance narrative should be given control of the means of production!

So, here's a compelling narrative that I have created which explores Karl Marx through a darker psychological lens. In it I have blended historical facts about Marx with an analysis of his life. What is the Postmodern legacy of Marx’s and Engels’ philosophy of Dialectical Materialism?

---

🔥 A Narrative of Karl Marx: The Rebel Against Existence

From the cobbled streets of Trier to the revolutionary salons of Paris and London, Karl Marx carried within him a storm—a profound discontent not merely with society, but with the very nature and architecture of existence. His writings thundered against the structures of power, class, and capital, but beneath the surface lay something more primal: a metaphysical fury, a rejection of the world as it was given. Namely a rejection of Godly order.

🌑 The Shadow Within

Marx’s father, Heinrich Marx, a lawyer and a man of Enlightenment ideals, once warned of the “darkness” in his son’s nature. In letters, he expressed concern over Karl’s intensity, his tendency toward isolation, and his relentless intellectual aggression. Heinrich feared that Karl’s brilliance was matched only by a destructive impulse—a refusal to accept limits, whether moral, social, or existential.

Karl did not seek reform. He sought rupture.

🧠 Hatred of the Given

Marx’s philosophical roots in Hegelian Dialectics gave him a framework to critique reality itself. But unlike Hegel, who saw history as the unfolding of reason, Marx saw history as a battlefield of suffering and exploitation. The material world, to Marx, was not a neutral stage—it was a prison built by the ruling class, upheld by ideology, and perpetuated by economic necessity.

His hatred was not just for capitalism. It was for the entire scaffolding of human existence that allowed such a system to emerge and endure.

🔥 Revolutionary Fire

In “The Communist Manifesto,” Marx and Engels called for the “forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions.” This wasn’t just political rhetoric—it was a metaphysical declaration. Marx envisioned a world where alienation would be abolished, where man would no longer be estranged from his labour, his community, or himself.

But to reach that utopia, everything had to burn. Which is why every spiritual descendant of Marxism from Cultural Marxist Critical Race, Gender and Climate Theory, Postmodern Cultural Relativism, and WOKE create nothing but a desire to tear existing structures down as though they have no utility!

🕯️ A Tragic Legacy

Marx’s vision was uncompromising. His personal life bore the marks of his obsession: poverty, illness, and the deaths of several children. Yet he never relented. His hatred of the nature of existence itself was so complete that even suffering seemed a necessary toll on the road to revolution.

He became, in essence, a prophet of negation—driven not by hope, but by a profound rejection of the world as it is. Therefore, Marx’s legacy is a negation of existence itself, the rejection of how God has designed and ordered this world. Marxism, in all its various forms, is a murderous rejection of Truth and beauty. Truth and beauty that can only be found in Christ as well as among those who emulate their Saviour’s grand design for humanity. Is religion truly the opiate of the people as Marx once declared? Only Marxism in all its perverse ideations could produce the drunken mass hysteria inherent to the prevailing belief in Postmodern Cultural Relativism. Which is why we are witnessing the mass immigration of people whose values are fundamentally opposed to ours. An invasion of the West under a Globalist elite class intoxicated by their quest for control over humanity. We are being run rough shod by people possessed by a relentless quest for power hidden within the grievance narrative they promote. A toxic grievance which equates to showing sympathy for the Devil. We are being led by a class of oligarch, many of whom are unelected, who themselves produce nothing of value, just like their ideological father Marx. As a result, we can be assured that persecution of the Church of Christ is coming since Christianity cannot coexist peacefully with Neo-Marxism. It is a grave mistake to ignore the fact that the West was founded upon Christian principles. Collectively the West has rejected the only One who can save it. Rather is has made Dialectical Materialism its false god. Will we repent of our idolatrous ideation? For only a return to Christ can restore the foundations of our culture that Marxism is presently tearing down! Moreover, a return to our Saviour begins with individual salvation. Each of us must personally choose Christ in order to stop the deconstruction of a Western World that is actually habitable!

Exposing the Cultural Marxist Operating System

 

How the Neo-Marxist consensus operates:

Communism is a doctrine of artificially manufactured finiteness, that's why Marx and Engels called their ideas “Dialectical Materialism”. Marxism demands the creation of an artificially manufactured consensus, which is why it requires a forced revolution to install itself without our consent. Only an unwashed lazy malcontent like Karl Marx could invent a grievance narrative as toxic as his Marxist version of socialism. Marx himself was so unproductive that he needed to live off his parents, Friedrich Engels and Engels' parents yet he had to gall to demand that he had the right to control the means of production. This even though he produced nothing but ideas based on resentment. This is demonstrated by the fact that Marx co-wrote a doctrine that rejects the very nature and structure of existence but had the unmitigated gall to call his "Dialectical Materialism" as “scientific”. There is solid evidence from Marx’s own writings that he knew his doctrines were based on falsehoods making him the most successful snake oil salesman of all time.

Communism exists on a spectrum that depends upon installing itself gradually. We can identify the Marxist enterprise by how each step of the revolution challenges normalcy. Every issue it tackles is never the real issue. The real issue is always the revolution. Every step along the road to Communism has the purpose of altering human nature by means of socially engineering humanity. The left's policies are based upon magical thinking since human nature itself is immutable. Under the influence of Neo-Marxists like Mark Carney we are witnessing the ascendance of a Gnostic mystery cult of forced social conformity that promotes deviance and sexual perversion. Canada’s government engages in state sanctioned censorship, state funding and control of the 4^th Estate which then operates as the government’s propaganda tool. Any who challenge their lies are instantly labelled as hateful, bigoted, extreme right wing, or even Nazis.

The Marxist goal of normalizing perversion:

Marxism seeks to destroy beauty and normalcy. It places the profane at the centre of the normal distribution rather than out on the wings of six sigma. It normalizes the perverse as though that which is unnatural must be normalized. This is why sexual deviance must be celebrated. Remember that Marxism is a spectrum dedicated to hijacking the process of socializing. There is much talk of the death of WOKE but what those who are predicting such forget is that Marxism constantly morphs itself since each attempt to defy the laws of nature fails miserably. So let’s look at one of the founders of Postmodern perversion, Georg Lukacs.

From Wikipedia: Georg Lukács, born Bernát György Löwinger, was a Hungarian Marxist philosopher, literary historian, literary critic, and aesthetician. He was one of the founders of Western Marxism, an interpretive tradition that departed from the Soviet Marxist ideological orthodoxy. Lukács developed the theory of reification and contributed to Marxist theory with developments of Karl Marx's theory of class consciousness. He was especially influential as a critic due to his theoretical developments of literary realism and of the novel as a literary genre. In 1919, he was appointed the Hungarian Minister of Culture of the government of the short-lived Hungarian Soviet Republic (March–August 1919).

Oxford Bibliographies: Lukács's intellectual trajectory is marked by important theoretical shifts, with a central idea permeating his investigations throughout his work: the critical analysis of the domination of subjectivism in modern society and culture, which causes men’s alienation from their historical reality. He was influential in literary realism and the novel as a genre. His "History and Class Consciousness" is considered a seminal Marxist text.

How the Woke Generation was Created through the Mass Sexualisation of Kids in Schools https://www.dharmadispatch.in/commentary/how-the-woke-generation-was-created-through-the-mass-sexualisation-of-kids-in-schools

Written by Sandeep Balakrishna Published on 1^st Mar 2021

The destruction of at least three generations was accomplished through sex education of schoolchildren. This essay narrates the history and the profiles of notable men and women responsible for it.

Exactly a century later, the aborted experiment of the Hungarian Marxist pervert György Lukács has been successfully revived on one side of the Atlantic and on the other side of the Pacific. From London to California, children as young as six are being “educated” in schools about such profound values as masturbation, safe sex, and “self-stimulation which encourages children to touch their "private parts" in bed and the shower.”

In 2019, more than two hundred and forty primary schools in England introduced a lesson titled All About Me taught to kids aged six to ten. As part of this, teachers were given a manual which has a section titled, The Rules of Self-Stimulation. Its excerpts make for chilling reading:

Lots of people like to tickle or stroke themselves as it might feel nice. They might play with their hair, stroke their skin, or they may even touch their private parts. This is really very normal. However, some people…say that it is dirty. This is strange as it is very normal, however, it is not polite to do it when other people are about. It is something we should only do when we are alone, perhaps in the bath or shower or bed, a bit like picking your nose, it is certainly not polite to do it in class when everyone is watching.

And then, the California Education Board informs us what kids of this age bracket should be taught in school: public school teachers should teach children about gender identity and the most effective ways to have safe sex. Here is another excerpt.

It gives tips for discussing masturbation with middle-schoolers, including telling them it is not physically harmful.

Outraged parents immediately hit back correctly claiming that pornography was being taught to kids in the guise of sex education. Which brings us back to the aforementioned Marxist pervert, György Lukács, one of the pioneers of the notorious Frankfurt School of Cultural Marxism.

After the second Bolshevik Revolution in Hungary in 1919, Lukács became the Deputy Commissar for Culture. One of the first things he did was to introduce sex education in primary schools with the long-term goal of dismantling traditional value systems which had the family at its centre. However, the experiment was short-lived because the Government fell. As this essay explains in detail, the Frankfurt School eventually infiltrated the American academia and spread its tentacles wide and deep. The near-total dismantling of the American society is among its deadlier consequences. The same holds true for Europe. And a massive contributor to this dismantling is what is known as sex education. More accurately, it is the mass-scale sexualization of kids right from school who then grow up as dysfunctional teenagers and remain lifelong adolescents.

Creating Child Prostitutes

A hundred yards from where I write this, 12-year-old prostitutes often stand under street lamps on the corner at night, waiting for customers.

Theodore Dalrymple, one of the finest minds of our time, wrote these lines in the summer of 2000 sitting at his desk in London. As terrible as this is, it is not the whole story. The whole story is the attitude of both the British government and the society it supposedly governs. Here is another slice of that society.

The local health authorities send a van round several times at night to distribute condoms to the girls, the main official concern being to ensure that the sex in which the girls take part is safe… It is the authorities' proud boast that 100 percent of local prostitutes now routinely use condoms, at a cost to the city's taxpayers of $135,000 a year, soon to be increased by the employment of a further outreach worker, whose main qualification…will be "an ability to work non-judgmentally"—that is, TO HAVE NO MORAL QUALMS ABOUT AIDING AND ABETTING CHILD PROSTITUTION.

But then, Theodore Dalrymple was only describing an outcome which was foreseen decades ago when sex education in schools was first introduced in the West. A fine essay on the subject is by the British child psychologist, Louise Eickhoff who wrote in the September 19, 1970 issue of the The Guardian. The following are some excerpts from that essay, relevant even today. Emphases have been added.

Sex Education

ln all countries where sex education has been introduced the same corruptive pattern of social change has been observed: increased illegitimacy and venereal disease, promiscuity and amateur prostitution, sexually symbolic or sexually aggressive crimes and the substitute satisfactions of smoking, drinking, and drug-taking, and a lowering of the age of those involved.

There has been an increase in the need for pornography, even for orgies such as the Danish sex fair, the Isle of Wight pop festival, and "Oh! Calcutta!" There has been an upsurge in wanton, destructive aggression in the community and public displays of filth, heard on streets, on public transport, and seen on walls, even in the "Ladies," emanating from the lips and hands of children...

Hijacking our innate tribal instincts to further the Marxist enterprise:

Humans are essentially tribal by nature. Cultural Marxism hijacks our tribal instincts by parasitizing these instincts to create an entirely new tribe that is not based upon race. Whose face does an infant prefer to look at? Since most babies are primarily cared for by females, most babies prefer to look at female faces. But there is an interesting exception to this rule. Babies also prefer to look at faces that match the gender of their primary caregiver only if those faces are the same race as the primary caregiver.

From the National Library of Medicine https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19334302/

Infant preference for female faces occurs for same- but not other-race faces:

Paul C Quinn 1, Lesley Uttley, Kang Lee, Alan Gibson, Michael Smith, Alan M Slater, Olivier Pascalis

Affiliations Expand

PMID: 19334302 DOI: 10.1348/174866407x231029

Abstract

There has been a recent surge of interest in the question of how infants respond to the social attributes of race and gender information in faces. This work has demonstrated that by 3 months of age, infants will respond preferentially to same-race faces and faces depicting the gender of the primary caregiver. In the current study, we investigated emergence of the female face preference for same- versus other-race faces to examine whether the determinants of preference for face gender and race are independent or interactive in young infants. In Expt I, 3-month-old Caucasian infants displayed a preference for female over male faces when the faces were Caucasian, but not when the faces were Asian. In Expt 2, new-born Caucasian infants did not demonstrate a preference for female over male faces for Caucasian faces. The results are discussed in terms of a face prototype that becomes progressively tuned as it is structured by the interaction of the gender and race of faces that are experienced during early development.

The Neo-Marxist goal of hijacking these systems:

Parasites employ various cunning strategies to manipulate their hosts, often leading to the host's detriment or even death. These strategies range from behavioral manipulation and immune system evasion to mimicking host traits and even causing physical harm. This requires behavioral manipulation that alters the host’s behavior to increase the probability of transmitting the parasitical ideas to others. This is why the left is so hard to defeat. They operate in unison to achieve their desecration of normalcy through the parasitical ideas of Cultural Marxism. These ideas have hijacked our normal inclinations to pervert them to serve the Marxist enterprise which essentially has one real end goal, to tear it all down!

The God dilemma inherent to Marxist Hegelianism, how do we return to the quest for beauty and normalcy in a hideous world that worships violence, perversion, and sexual deviance where we are instructed that this endeavour is a matter of “pride” given that pride is one of the seven deadly sins?

The Postmodern Marxist revolution echoes the oldest human example of parasitical ideation identified in the book of Genesis:

Genesis 3:1-6 King James Version

1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?

2 And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:

3 But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.

4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:

5 For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.

6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.

The parasitical ideation that the Serpent offered to Eve is identical in nature to what Cultural Marxism offers us, namely a secret form of knowledge that will make us like gods. This so-called knowledge can only lead to death, since death are the wages of sin. Marxism in all its variations glorifies that which is perverse and unnatural. It is time to return to the pursuit of beauty and normalcy. It is time to repent and turn to Christ away from the perverse ideation of the social engineers whose only success has been to deconstruct society. Whatever form and/or label that Marxism’s parasitical ideas may take, they have the same purpose namely, to parasitize our minds to undermine Godly order. This equates to challenging God’s plan for humanity. A plan that God has left imprinted on our collective psyche. This is why we sense that something has gone desperately and fundamentally wrong. Cultural Marxism exists to scream at every possible juncture, “Hath God said?”, just as the serpent once said to our ancestral mother Eve in the primordial garden of Eden. Marxism is an attempt to return to Eden by eating from the one tree whose forbidden fruit will surely prevent us from ever finding the Kingdom of God.