I suppose many of you will not find my epistle loving in the
sense that you may have hoped it would be. I want to speak with you all about
returning to a primitive and Biblical form of worship free of organized religion.
But before I do we need some context. From Mark 2:22 NAS: “And no one puts new
wine into old wineskins; otherwise the wine will burst the skins, and the wine
is lost and the skins as well; but one puts new wine into fresh wineskins.” We
have a clear pattern for how the New Testament church met, was ministered to, functioned,
gathered, and worshipped during the first century laid down in the Scriptures.
It astounds me how many believers who appear to be very zealous in the practice
of their beliefs choose to ignore what the Scriptures clearly state.
Let us look at how no one operates without the mark of beast
of Big Government attached to Big Organized religion today. Pay close attention
to the fact that no one buys or sells in the name of their religious organization
without the mark of, you guessed it, the beast.
Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada, proof of copyright:
Canadian Conference of Mennonite Brethren Churches, proof of
copyright:
The Fellowship of Evangelical Baptist Churches, proof of copyright:
Associated Gospel Churches, proof of copyright:
Why this bugs me, from Revelation 13 NAS Bible:
16 And he causes all, the small and the great, and the rich
and the poor, and the free men and the slaves, to be given a mark on their
right hand or on their forehead,
17 and he provides that no one will be able to buy or to
sell, except the one who has the mark, either the name of the beast or the
number of his name.
18 Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding calculate
the number of the beast, for the number is that of a man; and his number is six
hundred and sixty-six *.
What the reformer themselves thought on the matter:
From the Journal of the Adventist Theological Society, 18/1
(Spring 2007): 81–100. Article copyright © 2007 by Dennis Pettibone.
Martin
Luther’s Views on the Antichrist
Dennis Pettibone
Southern Adventist University
“In the warm ecumenical afterglow of Vatican II, Martin
Luther’s identification of the papacy as the Antichrist of Bible prophecy is
often seen as narrow-minded, bigoted, and even unchristian. His view, which until
recently was shared by a broad spectrum of conservative Evangelical
Protestants, is now seen as an embarrassment by some members of churches that
retain this interpretation. It is no longer socially acceptable to describe the
papacy as the fulfillment of a collection of prophecies regarding a powerful
spiritual tyranny.
Even the United States Congress has put itself on record
regarding this issue. In 2000 Congress passed a joint resolution condemning Bob
Jones University for promoting this belief. The politicians who passed that
resolution were probably unaware that they were undermining the historical
foundations of Protestantism, but this is the logical inference one can make
from this significant observation by Professor Phillip Cary of Eastern
University: “The Reformation wouldn’t have happened without the conviction that
the pope was Antichrist.”
Since this conviction is one that most contemporary
Protestants have discarded, Cary—who describes himself as an “ecumenical minded
Protestant” — challenges his fellow Protestants: “If the pope isn’t the
Antichrist, what right do you have to be split?” If Protestantism owes its very
existence to Luther’s conviction that the papacy was the Antichrist, it might
be instructive to inquire why Luther held this view and under what
circumstances he came to this conclusion. We will see that he came to this view
slowly and reluctantly, driven by historical circumstances and theological
reflection. We will also briefly note the comparable views of other Protestant
Reformers and their predecessors. Looking at the idea that the papacy is the
Antichrist of prophecy in its historical context might give us a rational basis
for evaluating it. We will focus primarily on Luther because it was his views
on the subject that triggered the Protestant Reformation. However, we should
note that Luther was far from the first person to hold this view. Luther
himself credited John Huss with being the first to call the pope an Antichrist.
Huss did indeed consider the Pope to be the Antichrist, but he was not the
first to do so, nor was his mentor, John Wycliffe, although Wycliffe and at
least some of his Lolland followers, including Sir John Oldcastle, held this
belief. This idea also circulated among the Waldensians, the Albigensians, and
the Fraticelli, a group of Franciscans with more regard for the rule of St.
Francis than for papal authority. But even earlier than that, back in 991,
Bishop Arnulf of Orleans, describing papal murder, lust, and intrigue, asked,
“Are there any bold enough to maintain that the priests of the Lord over all
the world are to take their law from monsters of guilt like these . . .?” When
a person so deficient in virtue sits on the papal throne, Arnulf suggested that
he must “be the ‘Antichrist, sitting in the temple of God, and showing himself
as God.’” Martin Luther was probably unaware of the previous attacks on the
papacy when, in 1517, he drafted his 95 Theses. If he had been, he would have
been unsympathetic. At the time he regarded John Huss as a heretic. His target
was not the papacy; it was a greedy Dominican monk named Johann Tetzel who was
distorting Catholic doctrine by exaggerating the benefits of indulgences. Luther
had no intention of splitting the church: he was only trying to protect his
parishioners.” - end of quote
Well, there’s the trouble you see. The reformers knew that
the Roman Church was based upon the rule of a false Bishop in Rome who claimed
to be able to absolve sin, have the power over heaven, earth, and hell to bind
and loose (hence the Pope’s three-tiered helmet) and uses of keys representing this
as one of his symbols. From Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_regalia_and_insignia#:~:text=The%20keys%20are%20gold%20and%20silver%20to%20represent,%22governor%20of%20the%20world%22%20and%20%22Vicar%20of%20Christ%22
“The crossed keys symbolise the keys of Simon Peter. The keys are gold and silver to represent the power of loosing and binding. The triple crown (the tiara) symbolizes the triple power of the Pope as "father of kings", "governor of the world" and "Vicar of Christ". Pictured above is the seal of the Vatican City The gold cross on a monde (globe) surmounting the tiara symbolizes the sovereignty of Jesus.”
The Anti-Christ of the Bible did not mean the “against Christ” as many modern Christians have come to assume but rather “the in the place of Christ” where the Pope took the place of Christ to an apostate church.
Furthermore, even though the reformers knew that the Pope represented
the office of the Anti-Christ they attempted to rework the fallen church by
putting new wine into an old wineskin. Brethren our righteous ancestors did not
go near far enough in returning to the pattern laid down in the New Testament
which defines the nature of Christ’s body here on earth. If we are to glorify Christ,
we are commissioned to recover it. For it is that glorification that will usher
in His return.
The Body of Christ is an organism, not an organization. Reworked Roman Catholicism with the remnants of its Papal excesses, worship of images and relics, superstition, and mummery only blind believers to the unvarnished Truth of Christ which can only be manifested in a gathering unencumbered by the remnants of the old religion. The very religion which bastardized primitive Christian gatherings to create an organized corporatized big government sanctioned religion where no man bought or sold without the image of the beast of state control and licensing. That beloved is the diametric opposite of Godly!