One of the great problems of our time exists due to addressing
the symptoms of a problem rather than examining and addressing said problem’s
root cause(s). No physician worth his salt will merely treat the symptoms of an
illness without addressing the disease’s root cause(s). We see this in the way that
the state in concert with international health care authorities developed public
health policies for COVID-19. A mere few short years ago we were being censored
for merely suggesting that the virus originated in the self same Level-4 laboratory
in Wuhan where Pfizer had been developing mRNA technology. But worse than this initial failure of correctly
assessing how the virus originated and how best to treat it, we know that the BIG
LIE ostensibly appears to be a continuance of the CIA’s MKUltra mind control. Western
government’s, including Trump’s first administration, fully cooperated with and
helped to fund the CCP’s military who run the bio-lab in Wuhan.
From Wikipedia:
“Project MKUltra is a human experimentation program
designed and undertaken by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to
develop procedures and identify drugs that could be used during interrogations
to weaken individuals and force confessions through brainwashing and
psychological torture. The term MKUltra is a CIA cryptonym: "MK" is
an arbitrary prefix standing for the Office of Technical Service and
"Ultra" is an arbitrary word out of a dictionary used to name this
project. The program has been widely condemned as a violation of individual
rights and an example of the CIA's abuse of power, with critics highlighting
its disregard for consent and its corrosive impact on democratic principles.”
To date there has not been an official admission of the
sheer level of mind control which was used by state actors to manipulate public
opinion. This was particularly effective amongst those who have a high level of
trust in the state so long as it pursues a progressive agenda aimed at radically
transforming society into a mind meld of socialist conformity. So, what can history
tell us about similar attempts to radically transform society. What happened
when the advocates of change refused to examine the damage caused by such radical
transformation? What damages were caused in maintaining functional socioeconomic
order? So let me begin with the following two quotes from periods of British
history where the Kingdom had been descended into civil unrest.
“Anarchy is not so much the absence of government as the
government of the worst—not aristocracy but kakistocracy—a state of things,
which to the honor of our nature, has seldom obtained amongst men, and which
perhaps was only fully exemplified during the worst times of the French
revolution, when that horrid hell burnt with its most horrid flame. In such a
state of things, to be accused is to be condemned—to protect the innocent is to
be guilty; and what perhaps is the worst effect, even men of better nature, to
whom their own deeds are abhorrent, are goaded by terror to be forward and
emulous in deeds of guilt and violence.” ~ Thomas Love Peacock
“Therefore we need not make any scruple of praying
against such: against those Sanctimonious Incendiaries, who have fetched fire
from heaven to set their Country in combustion, have pretended Religion to
raise and maintaine a most wicked rebellion: against those Nero's, who have
ripped up the wombe of the mother that bare them, and wounded the breasts that
gave them sucke: against those Cannibal's who feed upon the flesh and are
drunke with the bloud of their own brethren: against those Catiline's who seeke
their private ends in the publicke disturbance, and have set the Kingdome on
fire to rost their owne egges: against those tempests of the State, those
restlesse spirits who can no longer live, then be stickling and medling; who
are stung with a perpetuall itch of changing and innovating, transforming our
old Hierarchy into a new Presbytery, and this againe into a newer Independency;
and our well-temperd Monarchy into a mad kinde of Kakistocracy. Good Lord!” ~ Paul
Gosnold's “A sermon preached at the publique fast the ninth day of Aug.
1644 at St. Maries, Oxford, before the honorable members of the two Houses of
Parliament there assembled:”
The word Kakistocracy was first coined as early as the 17th
century and derives from two Greek words, kákistos (κάκιστος, 'worst') and krátos (κράτος, 'rule'), together meaning 'government
by the worst people'. The earliest use of the word dates to the 17th century given
by Paul Gosnold.
I will keep stating the following until the following is
fully understood, most conservatives completely fail to understand the grip,
the sheer power, of ideological possession. What are the successes of MKUltra
in manipulating public opinion through psychological abuse and mind control?
When the West agreed to cooperate with the Soviet Union to defeat Nazi Germany
our leaders used Cultural Marxist Critical Theory by incorporating its thinking
into the forerunner of the CIA. Wild Bill Donovan used the Frankfurt School’s
ideas to defeat both Soviet Marxism and Nazism. The CIA has since been using
our universities to spread Postmodernism and Critical Theory ever since.
Europeans have never really understood limited constitutional government. The idea
of Parliament limiting the King is an entirely English and therefore a British and
in turn American construct. This is why almost all European countries are still
governed by coalition legislative bodies, in other words, rule by the BLOB, of
the BLOB, and for the BLOB. The EU has become a fulfillment of a socioeconomic
confederacy dominated by Germany, just as "the Fuhrer" intended.
Tyranny was always waiting to pounce like a lion on any
semblance of freedom that the West ever knew. Type Critical Theory and
Postmodernism into any search engine of your choosing to examine the curriculum
being taught by all major Western universities. The humanities departments of
these institutions have become the weaponized tools by which radical social
engineers have taken the long Neo-Marxist march through our institutions. We
are in an ideological battle where most so-called right wingers have no
understanding of what they are fighting. Worse, many of you appear not to care.
Many conservatives are people who prefer bombastic
leaders for several reasons:
1.
Charisma and Confidence: Bombastic
leaders often exude charisma and confidence, which can be appealing to
followers. Their assertiveness and boldness can inspire trust and admiration.
2.
Clear Vision: These leaders often present
a clear and compelling vision for the future. Their strong rhetoric can make
their ideas seem more achievable and attractive.
3.
Decisiveness: Bombastic leaders tend to
make decisions quickly and assertively. This decisiveness can be reassuring to
people who prefer clear direction and action.
4.
Emotional Appeal: Their passionate and
energetic communication style can resonate emotionally with people, making them
feel more connected and motivated.
5.
Perceived Strength: Bombastic leaders are
often seen as strong and capable of handling challenges. This perception can be
comforting to followers who seek stability and security.
6.
Media Influence: The media often
highlights and amplifies the actions and statements of bombastic leaders,
increasing their visibility and influence.
But invariably the following issues are deliberately
being ignored:
1.
Polarization: Bombastic leaders often use
divisive rhetoric that can polarize societies. This can lead to increased
tension and conflict among different groups.
2.
Oversimplification: These leaders may
present complex issues in overly simplistic terms, which can lead to misguided
policies and decisions. Their black-and-white thinking can ignore the nuances
and complexities of real-world problems.
3.
Authoritarian Tendencies: Bombastic
leaders often exhibit authoritarian tendencies, such as undermining democratic
institutions and processes. This can erode the rule of law and threaten
democratic governance.
4.
Impulsiveness: Their tendency to make
quick, assertive decisions can sometimes lead to impulsive and poorly
thought-out actions. This can have serious consequences, especially in matters
of national or international importance.
5.
Manipulation: Bombastic leaders can
manipulate public opinion through emotional appeals and sensationalism. This
can lead to a misinformed and manipulated populace, which can be detrimental to
a healthy democracy.
6.
Short-term Focus: These leaders often
prioritize short-term gains and immediate results over long-term planning and
sustainability. This can lead to policies that are not in economically viable
for the prosperity and economic well-being of future generations.
If you think these characteristics do not describe Trump,
then you’re an ideologically possessed fool. Ask yourselves, since you
rightfully condemn the left for doing precisely the same thing, why you are so
willingly duped or blind to your own willingness to forgo reason to march in
unthinking lockstep with others with whom you identify? Don’t you condemn the
left for doing precisely the same? A true conservative is someone who believes
in personal accountability and self-reliance. They will not place their faith
in politicians, no matter how much they admire them. Politics by its very
nature is based upon manipulation. This is why conservatives are very often
Christians. They understand the fallen nature of humanity and that there is
only one Saviour, Christ Jesus. If you have placed your faith in man, any man
no matter who they are, I will tell you what you are not and what you are, you
are not a conservative, you are an ideologically possessed idolator! Do I really
need to remind you that Pierre Poilievre was a shoo-in for PM until Trump resurrected
the Monroe Doctrine to threaten Canadian sovereignty then effectively crown
Marx Carney as our new PM?
Legislative assemblies came into being as a direct result of
Magna Carta. The King, or Executive Branch of government, was forced to bring
their requests to levy taxes to parliament to receive approval for further
expenditures or to pass legislation. Most of the major policies enacted by Trump
to date have been by executive order thereby ignoring the need for democratic
consent of his policies. It does not matter how excellent his policies are. Trump
is not a King. The executive branch of government must never operate without being
limited by the legislative branch of government. America herself was literally
founded upon this principle since the King had attempted to levy taxation
without the colonists being represented in parliament in London. Most of you
who call yourselves conservatives have no understanding of the political
history of the very system of government you claim to espouse.
I know I have just wasted by time by writing these
demonstrable facts. I do so, so that when all is said and done, I will not be found
wanting in my duty to tell my readers and listeners the unvarnished truth not
placing my faith in mere men but in God and in God alone.
2 Timothy 2 (KJV):
13 If we believe not, yet he abideth
faithful: he cannot deny himself.
14 Of these things put them in
remembrance, charging them before the Lord that they strive not about words to
no profit, but to the subverting of the hearers.
15 Study to shew thyself approved
unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word
of truth.
No comments:
Post a Comment