Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Understanding the architecture of belief

 


Why I am a man of belief: I need to know why others believe in a false version of reality

When I say that I am a man of belief most would think that I am referring to my personal system of faith but in this context that is not what I am referring to. Rather I am seeking to understand what motivates people to behave as they do on the most fundamental level. I seek to understand how people come to perceive the world since this defines how they will interact with others. Since I have this deep need to understand how others perceive reality it is painfully obvious to me that reality is the last thing that is often sought to be understood. To understand this process better, we must first delve into the realm of Jungian psychology. Jung theorized that the parts of a person’s psyche that have failed to be integrated into a complete personality will simply refuse to be denied. Rather these unintegrated sub-personas will project themselves out onto the world at large. So, when I state that I am a man of belief what I am referring to is the phenomenon of identifying how people come to believe what they believe and interact with others as a result. This reactionary behaviour was labelled by Dr. Jung as “shadow projection”. To develop this understanding one must first identify the effects that the unintegrated parts of our personality dictate how we will perceive the world around us and interact socially in it. For it is these unintegrated sub-personas that will paint the canvas of our perceptions. This results in our false perceptions being laid out in identifiable patterns of repeated self-defeating behaviours.

Dr. Leon Festinger's brilliant work on Cognitive Dissonance explains in brutal clarity that a mountain of evidence presented to an individual who is possessed by their unintegrated shadow often fails to persuade them to relinquish beliefs that the evidence presented has demonstrated to be false. Quite the opposite in fact. Evidence presented to an individual captured by their own shadow will only cause them to double down on beliefs driven by the projection of the very shadow that they deny and repress. Moreover, their shadow will attack any and all who seek to enlighten them for they fear the light that could reveal the unintegrated parts they desperately seek to keep hidden.

Since the shadow is not the whole and complete individual it operates as a sub-persona that reduces the world into a state of reductionism which rejects complexity and nuance. In fact, it has been my experience that any attempt to reason or debate with a person captured by their unintegrated shadow will merely repeat Dr. Festingers’ experiment in Cognitive Dissonance. Since an individual thus captured by their own shadow is completely unaware of the things that actually create their own belief system, they run about projecting their shadow onto others wondering why people react as they do to their false grasp of reality. Narcissism is a mechanism the psyche often employs to protect the shadow from being exposed to the light. The narcissist’s prime task in life is to find others who will validate their lack of psychological integration. This is known as seeking for narcissistic supply. To a narcissist thus driven by their unintegrated shadow others exist only for their validation since the farce must be substantiated by others who will play along with their delusional ideation.

This sadly is why politics is a realm where unindividuated people with reductionist views of reality play their sick narcissistic game to project their twisted understanding of how the world ought to operate onto the body politic. The only thing that can end this sick dance is to expose the fact that the emperor’s new set of clothes ain’t nothing but a birthday suit. It is so easy, at least for me, to uncover what beliefs motivate our political class where diplomacy, nuance, maturity and self-awareness are swept away by a torrent of shadow projection where anyone who dares to challenge the naked emperor will be vilified. Challenging the psychologically unwhole narcissist will invariably be met with disdain and contempt to the point where the narcissist’s shadow will demand that those who see reality for what it is must be silenced and indeed by force if necessary. This is precisely why we are seeing legislation currently being drafted aimed at silencing dissent by making telling the truth a hate crime.

In summary: My reflections touch on profound psychological and philosophical themes. In exploring the intersection of belief, perception, and psychological integration, through the lenses of Carl Jung’s shadow theory and Leon Festinger’s cognitive dissonance.


🔍 Understanding Belief Through the Shadow

When I say that I am a "man of belief," I am not referring to dogma or doctrine, but rather to a quest to understand the architecture of belief itself—how people construct their realities, often unconsciously. This is a powerful stance, because it shifts the focus from what people believe to why they believe it.

Jung’s concept of the shadow—the unconscious parts of ourselves we deny or repress—offers us a compelling framework. These unintegrated aspects don’t disappear; they manifest externally through projection, shaping how individuals perceive others and the world. This projection creates a distorted lens, often leading to self-defeating behaviors, tribalism, and ideological rigidity.


🧠 Cognitive Dissonance and the Defense of False Realities

Festinger’s theory of cognitive dissonance complements Jung’s ideas. When confronted with evidence that contradicts deeply held beliefs, individuals often experience psychological discomfort. Rather than revise their beliefs, they may:

  • Double down on their existing views.
  • Rationalize or reinterpret the evidence.
  • Attack the source of the contradiction.

This is especially true when those beliefs are tied to the shadow, because acknowledging the truth would mean confronting painful, repressed aspects of the self.


🧍‍♂️ Narcissism and the Need for Validation

My connection between narcissism and shadow projection is important since narcissistic behavior should be seen as a defense mechanism to shield the ego from the vulnerability of integration. The narcissist seeks external validation to maintain their fragile self-image, often manipulating others into reinforcing their delusions. This dynamic is particularly visible in political and ideological arenas, where power and identity are at stake.


🏛️ Politics as a Stage for Shadow Projection

Politics has become a theater for collective shadow projection. Leaders and followers alike may operate from unexamined beliefs, projecting their fears and desires onto opponents. The result is a reductionist worldview that resists nuance and vilifies dissent. The metaphor of the “emperor’s new clothes” is apt since truth-tellers are often punished for exposing uncomfortable realities.


💡 Where Do We Go From Here?

My analysis raises a vital question: How can we foster psychological integration and collective maturity? Here are some possibilities:

  • Promoting self-awareness through education, therapy, and introspection. Most importantly the Christian life itself is one of self examination for a Christian knows that he or she is his or her worst enemy           2 Corinthians 13:5- “Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith; prove your own selves. Know ye not your own selves, how that Jesus Christ is in you, except ye be reprobates?”
  • Encouraging dialogue that values complexity over certainty.
  • Creating spaces where dissent is not only tolerated but respected.
  • Recognizing projection in ourselves and others as a path to empathy.
  • Recognizing the limits of empathy, though can empathise with the narcissist’s ideological possession this does not mean that we should have suicidal empathy for ideas that are deconstructing the very foundations of functional civil order and discourse

No comments:

Post a Comment

Understanding the architecture of belief

  Why I am a man of belief: I need to know why others believe in a false version of reality When I say that I am a man of belief most woul...