In an age of delusion, I aim to provide Christians with the tools needed to counter the enemy's lies. Postmodernism, Critical Race Theory, Diversity, Inclusiveness, Equity, WOKE, Net-Zero Carbon are all variations on a Neo-Marxist theme. Namely the belief that life is a zero-sum game, a Malthusian nightmare where resources are so finite that the state must redistribute them. This channel is dedicated to providing you with the meat of the Word of God sorely lacking in Christian circles today.
I pay close attention to this channel’s audience as to whether or not you find my arguments compelling. In that vein I deliberately invite your input and criticisms. It may be the case that so few listen to my concerns that expressing them here is pointless. Nevertheless, I feel compelled to continue to share my thoughts with as many as will listen. As well, I am aware of the inadequacy of my own poor pursuit of the truth.
We are living in strange times where a positive feedback loop created by mass ideological possession has led to its increase. If we look at the benefits of living in a stable society, a positive feedback loop moves society further away from the target of social equilibrium. The ideas which have created the feedback loop we are living in are being amplified by the extent to which society writ large adopts these beliefs.
For two thousand years European culture was founded upon basic Christian Truths. Fundamental to these Truths is the concept of original sin and the need for Christ the Redeemer. This fundamental understanding of fallen human nature has been replaced by a counterfeit. The idea of original sin seems too unjust and unfair to be deemed acceptable to a Postmodern age which affords licence to every ungodly behaviour which were once deemed to be sinful. The counterfeit involves the belief that we are born tabula rasa, a blank slate without sin and therefore are infinitely malleable to be shaped into whatever transhumanist form the social engineers’ desire. This leads to two contradictory phenomena, first the belief that bad behaviour is learned rather than inherited from Adam, secondly that by means of social engineering that mankind can be perfected. This is why it is assumed that negative traits such as prejudice and intolerance of things we see as a threat to social cohesion can be trained out of mankind. It is also why the idea of the need for sacrifice has been moved away from the Sacrifice of Christ on the Cross to be exchanged for the counterfeit idea of collective atonement. This is nothing less nor other than turning back to the pagan beliefs of the past where sacrifices were offered to appease the gods of nature to placate the weather. Which is why I posit that the globalist elite are the priests of a new religious cult.
What are the ten hallmarks of a religious cult?
•Absolute authoritarianism without meaningful accountability.
•No tolerance for questions or critical inquiry.
•No meaningful financial disclosure regarding budget, expenses such as an independently audited financial statement.
•Unreasonable fear about the outside world, such as impending catastrophe, evil conspiracies, and persecutions.
•There is no legitimate reason to leave, former followers are always wrong in leaving, negative or even evil.
•Former members often relate the same stories of abuse and reflect a similar pattern of grievances.
•There are records, books, news articles, or television programs that document the abuses of the group/leader.
•Followers feel they can never be “good enough.”
•The group/leader is always right.
•The group/leader is the exclusive means of knowing “truth” or receiving validation, no other process of discovery is really acceptable or credible.
It is interesting to note that the religious zeal inherent to the climate cult was identical to the elite’s reaction to COVID-19. Never in my lifetime have I personally witnessed the level of fear, irrational behaviour, demonizing, catastrophizing, and moreover, the willingness to sacrifice our well-being to propagate a narrative which has proven to be patently false and alarmist. Worse, there was silencing of public debate as to where the virus originated and why the place of the virus’s origin coincided with the development of mRNA technology by Pfizer. In fact to question the official story of the wet market immediately got one labelled a conspiracy theorist who would be placed in social media hoosegow for daring to challenge the authorita of the priests of this cult. The harm their willful ignorance caused and the willingness of the masses to march in blind lockstep was truly remarkable to behold, it was a hysteria which lasted three years. And the manner in which the authorities clamped down on those of us who questioned their official narrative during this time was nothing shy of soft totalitarianism on full display. The elite’s reaction to COVID and Climate Change are pages torn from the same playbook which were used by the same globalist players.
From my previous vodcast and blog on cognitive dissonance I wrote about how alternative opinions create psychological tensions and inner conflicts in the ideologically possessed. Ideologues will react with hostility when presented with information that challenges or disproves their beliefs. Their reaction is known as “cognitive dissonance” which is the psychological theory that explains this discomfort. It was first identified by renowned American psychologist, researcher, and author Leon Festinger who was responsible for developing cognitive dissonance theory as well as social comparison theory. Challenging the dominance of behaviourism, Festinger spearheaded methods of scientific experimentation used to study social psychology.
So how does cognitive dissonance manifest itself? Here are a few quotes from Dr. Festinger himself to provide some prospective:
“A man with a conviction is a hard man to change. Tell him you disagree, and he turns away. Show him facts or figures and he questions your sources. Appeal to logic and he fails to see your point.
We have all experienced the futility of trying to change a strong conviction, especially if the convinced person has some investment in his belief. We are familiar with the variety of ingenious defenses with which people protect their convictions, managing to keep them unscathed through the most devastating attacks.
But man’s resourcefulness goes beyond simply protecting a belief. Suppose an individual believes something with his whole heart; suppose further that he has a commitment to this belief, that he has taken irrevocable actions because of it; finally, suppose that he is presented with evidence, unequivocal and undeniable evidence, that his belief is wrong: what will happen? The individual will frequently emerge, not only unshaken, but even more convinced of the truth of his beliefs than ever before. Indeed, he may even show a new fervor about convincing and converting other people to his view.” ― Leon Festinger, “When Prophecy Fails: A Social & Psychological Study of a Modern Group that Predicted the Destruction of the World”
Yes, their prophecy has failed. Neither has their false means of redemption resulted in salvation. The outcome is a dystopian nightmare in which the elite offer humanity up as a sacrifice. This is the pagan altar of globalism. They have exchanged a belief in original sin for collective guilt. This is why they view humanity as a blight on the planet despoiling mother earth of her finite resources. The elite are Malthusians whose prophecies of doom are never forthcoming in any other form other than in the damage they wreak on others out of their blind zeal to offer us up as sacrifices on the altar of their doomsday cult. A sacrifice which the elite themselves never partake in as they live in unearned privilege. And the more they are proven to be wrong, just as Dr. Festinger demonstrated in his research on cognitive dissonance, the more they double down on their ideological delusions. It is up to us to expose those delusions since they stand in opposition to the finished work of Christ on the Cross. And yes, it is up to Christians to defend the faith against such blasphemous heresy!
On Classical liberalism versus the illiberal authoritarianism
inherent in the new global order. The biggest names in Classical Liberalism
that most of us will have heard of are going to be people like John Locke, Adam
Smith, and John Stuart Mill. If you're an educated freedom lover, then these
are the Classical Liberal thinkers that you will have read and read deeply.
Works like Locke’s, “Two Treatises of Government”, Smith’s, “The Wealth of Nations”
and Mill’s, “On Liberty” have become part of our intellectual furniture if you
believe as I do that some form of liberalism broadly construed is deeply decent
and moral. Moreover, that we need to develop the moral fervor to reform all
illiberal and authoritarian cultural traditions to make society better. In
doing so we become committed cultural activists by channeling the political
ideals of John Locke, Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill since we hold their ideals
to be the right way to advance the cause of liberty under law. Yet when we compare
John Locke to Emmanuel Kant’s belief that the development of the individual is
in conflict with the development of the species, and only the development of
the species counts, or the free market economy of Adam Smith with the dialectical
materialism implicit in the total state economic control posited by Karl Marx,
or of Friedrich Nietzsche’s Übermensch with an advocate of free will like John Stuart
Mill, we find ourselves in entirely different philosophical universes. It's not
merely a collision of philosophies but also a collision of values. It is a
collision of the inherent dignity of the individual versus the facelessness of
the socialist collective. As a result, by the time of the 20th century this
collision of philosophies became a collision in the trenches. Which is why the French
and the English along with their Allies had their guns pointed at the Germans while
the Germans had their guns pointed at us. The roots of this philosophical chasm
are deep, and we do ourselves a great disservice when we don't take the ideas which
created that chasm seriously.
There is an enormous question however which arises from
having stated that essentially Classical Liberalism as defined in the previous
paragraph didn’t arise on the Continent but rather only within the Anglosphere.
What can account for the differences in ideologies which demonstrably has resulted
in repeated global conflicts? Moreover, why were the most illiberal,
authoritarian, centrally controlled, and anti-individualistic ideas invariably
German? I was on safe ground until now but since my curiosity knows no bounds I
will dare to ask how and why this came to be? Today when discussing this very
issue withy my wife I asked her about epigenetics then did some research on the
matter. This is not my first rodeo attempting to understand this phenomenon better
as it relates to Janteloven, otherwise known as Tall Poppy or Crab-in-a-bucket
Syndrome. But today I happened upon a scientific paper which shed some light on
the matter. I am interested in your take on my concerns regarding this article.
I will read a few excerpts from it just to give you a feel for it. However,
read it for yourself in its entirety. It is lengthy but worth digesting given the
enormous social implications. I delve into this knowing full well that I am
likely offending my own family members who will undoubtedly label me an
Anglophile. Yes well, guilty as charged!
Could we be seeing an epigenetic phenomenon in the sudden
emergence of jackbooted mentality, particularly since COVID-19 and the failed
attempts on the part of the elite to mitigate the pandemic while crushing our
economic and social well-being? What is epigenetic in simple terms? “Epigenetics
is the study of how your behaviors and environment can cause changes that
affect the way your genes work. Unlike genetic changes, epigenetic changes are
reversible and do not change your DNA sequence, but they can change how your
body reads a DNA sequence.”
Gene–culture coevolution and the nature of
human sociality
“ABSTRACT
Human characteristics are the product of gene–culture
coevolution, which is an evolutionary dynamic involving the interaction of
genes and culture over long time periods. Gene–culture coevolution is a special
case of niche construction. Gene–culture coevolution is responsible for human
other-regarding preferences, a taste for fairness, the capacity to empathize
and salience of morality and character virtues.
1. GENE–CULTURE COEVOLUTION
Because of the importance of culture and complex social
organization to the evolutionary success of Homo sapiens, individual fitness in
humans depends on the structure of social life. Because culture is both
constrained and promoted by the human genome, human cognitive, affective, and
moral capacities are the product of an evolutionary dynamic involving the
interaction of genes and culture. We call this dynamic gene–culture coevolution
[1–4]. This coevolutionary process has endowed us with preferences that go
beyond the self-regarding concerns emphasized in traditional economic and
biological theory, and with a social epistemology that facilitates the sharing
of intentionality across minds. Gene–culture coevolution is responsible for the
salience of such other-regarding values as a taste for cooperation, fairness
and retribution, the capacity to empathize, and the ability to value such
character virtues as honesty, hard work, piety and loyalty.
Gene–culture coevolution is the application of
sociobiology, the general theory of the social organization of biological
species, to humans—a species that transmits culture in a manner that leads to
quantitative growth across generations. This is a special case of niche
construction, which applies to species that transform their natural environment
so as to facilitate social interaction and collective behaviour [5].
Cultural elements reproduce themselves from brain to brain
and across time, mutate and are subject to selection according to their effects
on the fitness of their carriers [2,20]. Moreover, there are strong
interactions between genetic and epigenetic elements in human evolution,
ranging from basic physiology (e.g. the transformation of the organs of speech
with the evolution of language) to sophisticated social emotions, including
empathy, shame, guilt and revenge-seeking [21–23].
Because of their common informational and evolutionary
character, there are strong parallels between models of genetic and cultural
evolution [17]. Like biological transmission, culture is transmitted from
parents to offspring, and like cultural transmission, which is transmitted
horizontally to unrelated individuals, so in microbes and many plant species,
genes are regularly transferred across lineage boundaries [6,24,25]. Moreover,
anthropologists reconstruct the history of social groups by analysing
homologous and analogous cultural traits, much as biologists reconstruct the
evolution of species by the analysis of shared characters and homologous DNA
[26]. Indeed, the same computer programs developed by biological systematists
are used by cultural anthropologists [27,28]. In addition, archeologists who
study cultural evolution have a similar modus operandi as palaeobiologists who
study genetic evolution [17]. Both attempt to reconstruct lineages of artifacts
and their carriers. Like palaeobiology, archaeology assumes that when analogy
can be ruled out, similarity implies causal connection by inheritance [29].
Like biogeography's study of the spatial distribution of organisms [30],
behavioural ecology studies the interaction of ecological, historical and
geographical factors that determine distribution of cultural forms across space
and time [31].”
This is heavy stuff for certain, but it does raise interesting
questions none the less. I have been exposed to extremely homogeneous
populations in the past and found them not merely weird but also intolerably
conformist and controlling. What was oddest about my encounters was their uncanny
ability to exhibit Borg like unity to the extent where that at times, I felt
having met one that I had met them all. I was also constantly aware that they
had once been under NAZI occupation, and that its own citizens had betrayed one
another for daring to question their overlords. On top of which that the” other
social collectivism” of the Soviet Union also had an enormous bearing on the
country’s Zeitgeist. Such nations are invariably welfare states with heavily
regulated economies featuring enormous social spending and even more enormous bureaucracies.
If we are witnessing an explosion of this mindset in a once
free and liberal country like Canada being led by a political entity which has
the gall to call itself the Liberal Party of Canada, well then, we are well and
truly facing a dilemma if the phenomenon we see emerging is a rejection of Classical
Liberal values for the “plikt” or duty to obey of Kant, the nihilism and transhumanism
of Nietzsche, and the dialectical materialism of Marx! God save us from this wicked
mindset!
No longer can they hide their agenda. Our elected leaders and their unelected influencers, influencers who appear to hold more power over us than do our elected representatives, are pushing a transhumanist, posthuman agenda on us. They are “trans”ing our children, they are destroying the economy, and they are teaching people to hate themselves and one another as they force their anti-cultural, apocalyptic, and dystopian view of reality on us. This is resulting in the real pandemic of our time, namely the emergence of nihilistic despair due to a loss of the principle upon which Western society was built, namely that we are sovereign persons created in the image of God. This is causing people to ask, “What can I do, the problem is so much bigger than me?” And therein lies the cause of our despair. But the West is rescued from nihilism every time we remember the legacy of those who have gone before who offered us solutions to this dilemma. Indeed, this is why my previous vodcast and blog featured Hans Nilsen Hauge. His legacy of placing the Kingdom of God first had enormous influence on spirituality and the economy. Hauge had paved the way for Norway to become a self-governing democracy free of its foreign overlords whose laws didn’t serve the Norwegian people.
Yet there is a movement in our postmodern world which is telling us that these answers to old questions no longer apply. We are told Mankind’s future lies in creating what Nietzsche referred to as the “Übermensch”, the ultimate future man who would transcend his own humanity to become superhuman. Moreover, in doing so that he would create his own value structure. We are seeing advocates of AI computing technology promoted as the means of transcending human limitations. This is exemplified when our gender is defined as a shackle to be overcome and be changed at will. That being human is nothing more than a consciousness embodied in a meat sack lacking divine soul and spirit. Or that we are not as smart as we could be so let’s get a chip surgically implanted into our brains. Mankind is now attempting to transcend the limits of human intelligence without ever having learned to think properly. Or that zoom can effectively replace the need for person-to-person human interaction since our essence is contained in digital communications. Frankly, given these facts, it is no wonder people are left feeling hopeless and nihilistic. Everything the elitists are attempting to do to us flies in the face of human biology by rejecting the human spirit and our need for connection with the Divine. After all, we are not merely embodied consciousnesses piloting meatsuits, we are creatures created in God’s own image made to live in fellowship with Him and our fellow man.
https://archive.ph/EGoEj#selection-1807.1-1807.65
The Role Of Henry Kissinger In Spawning The World Economic Forum
Comedic relief is sometimes the best way to understand complex topics, but it’s no laughing matter that Klaus Schwab’s oldest mentor is Trilateral Commission founding member, Henry Kissinger, who was also a prime architect of the Commission’s self-declared New International Economic Order. Thus, it’s no surprise the the WEF and Trilateral Commission are in perfect alignment for the Great Reset. ⁃ TN Editor
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Klaus Schwab, owner and chairman of the World Economic Forum (WEF), is the most dangerous man in the world
WEF’s ultimate goal is to do away with the democratic process and give all ownership and control to the deep state — and the technocratic elite who control it
WEF relies on fearmongering; when the population is controlled by fear, it welcomes authoritarian “protections” like increased surveillance and digital identity systems, introduced under the guise of safety, but which ultimately remove personal autonomy and freedom
WEF’s goal isn’t to just control life on Earth but to fundamentally change it by hacking into humans and removing free will
WEF, in partnership with investment firm BlackRock, has infiltrated the government and is colluding in corporatism, where an unelected corporate elite dictates top down to the population
You can protect your sovereignty by relying on your own critical thinking and choosing bravery over obedience
Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum (WEF), is the personification of The Great Reset — the ultimate goal of which is to do away with the democratic process and give all ownership and control to the deep state — and the technocratic elite who control it.
In the video above, comedian JP Sears outlines the primary reasons why this makes Schwab easily among the most dangerous people in the world — and arguably the most dangerous. One of The Great Reset’s “new normal” dictums is that you’ll own nothing and be happy. This is part of WEF’s 2030 agenda, and a plan is already in place to make it happen.
Schwab is also author of the book, “COVID-19: The Great Reset,” which was published July 9, 2020. “Wonder how he got it written and published that fast?” Sears said. “It’s almost like he prewrote it before he started the pandemic. I mean, before the pandemic started.”
Acute Crisis Boosts the Power of the State
WEF operates via fearmongering — about disease and environmental catastrophes, for starters. When the population is controlled by fear, it welcomes authoritarian “protections” like increased surveillance and digital identity systems, introduced under the guise of safety, but which ultimately remove personal autonomy and freedom.
In fact, Schwab wrote, “One of the greatest lessons of the past five centuries in Europe and America is this: Acute crisis contributes to boosting the power of the state. It’s always been the case, and there is no reason why it should be different with the COVID-19 pandemic.” Remember, nobody elected Schwab to any government position, but he’s behind the scenes pulling strings nonetheless.
WEF portrays itself as a global organization committed to improving the state of the world, but most would be taken aback if they knew who’s behind it. As Sears put it:
“You’ll be excited to hear that the lineup of World Economic Forum’s speakers at their annual gathering of elites in Davos included such benevolent humanitarians like Xi Jinping, the leader of the Chinese Communist Party, who’s currently committing genocide, and Tony Fauci, who’s arguably involved in crimes against humanity, and Bill Gates, who’s arguably involved in crimes against humanity, and Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison, who’s arguably currently involved in crimes against humanity. What a great line up!”
Committed to Reengineering Life Itself
WEF’s goal isn’t to just control life on Earth but to fundamentally change it. Schwab’s top adviser, transhumanist Dr. Yuval Noah Harari, openly admits data might enable human elites to do more than “just build digital dictatorships.”
“By hacking organisms,” Harari said, “elites may gain the power to re-engineer the future of life itself. Because once you can hack something, you can usually also engineer it.” Soon, he says, some corporations and governments will be able to “systematically hack all the people.” And if they succeed in hacking life, he describes it as the “greatest revolution in biology since the beginning of life 4 billion years ago.” According to Harari:
“For 4 billion years, nothing fundamental changed. Science is replacing evolution by natural selection with evolution by intelligent design. Not the intelligent design of some god above the clouds, but our intelligent design, and the intelligent design of our clouds — the IBM cloud, the Microsoft cloud — these are the new driving forces of evolution.”
Once human life is hacked, the hackers will maintain control over life itself — a process that has been accelerated by the pandemic. After all, Harari said, “It’s often said that you should never let a good crisis go to waste.”
Surveillance is a key part of the plan for global totalitarian control, and Harari says that in 100 years, people will be able to look back and identify the COVID-19 pandemic as the moment when a new regime in surveillance took over — “especially surveillance under the skin.”
WEF Is Actively Indoctrinating ‘Young Leaders’
WEF maintains a “Young Global Leaders” program, a five-year indoctrination into their principles. Its goal is to create world leaders who don’t answer to their people but to their bosses at WEF. Graduates of the program include world leaders who are “suspiciously in lockstep” with WEF’s Great Reset, such as:
Justin Trudeau, prime minister of Canada
Emmanuel Macron, president of France
Mark Zuckerberg, cofounder and CEO of Facebook
Sponsors of WEF’s Young Global Leaders Program include the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Google — “I wonder why Google censors and shapes information to be in exact support of the World Economic Forum’s narrative?” Sears asks. Meanwhile, WEF is predicting a worldwide cyberattack, which Schwab says “could bring a complete halt to the power supply, transportation, hospital services, our society as a whole.”
WEF then conducted a simulation of the cyberattack, which appears more like an elaborate planning session, much like Event 201 — WEF’s pandemic preparedness simulation for a “novel coronavirus” that took place in October 2019.
How Will People ‘Own Nothing and Be Happy’?
If WEF and Schwab are intent on moving ahead with their plan for global domination, they’ll need to get people on board with the idea of giving up ownership to an elite class. But how? Bring in BlackRock, an investment firm that has $9 trillion under management — a higher GDP than every country on Earth aside from the U.S. and China, Sears says.
BlackRock has more power than most governments on Earth, and it also controls the Federal Reserve, Wall Street mega-banks like Goldman Sachs and the WEF’s Great Reset, according to F. William Engdahl, a strategic risk consultant and lecturer who holds a degree in politics from Princeton University.
So, what’s the connection with the World Economic Forum? Blackrock founder and CEO Larry Fink is a WEF board member. Sears poses the question: “Is the World Economic Forum and Blackrock colluding in corporatism, where an unelected corporate elite dictates top down to the population?”
To do this, they’d need to infiltrate the government — and they have. Brian Deese, the U.S. director of National Economic Council, was formerly BlackRock’s global head of sustainable investing. “Now he’s Biden’s main adviser for economic policy,” Sears says. Vice President Kamala Harris’ chief economic strategist.
“It looks like corporatism but it’s probably not,” Sears says jokingly. “But if it was, it would actually be a viable strategy for BlackRock and the World Economic Forum to own everything and for you to own nothing.”
BlackRock is also buying up single family homes at an alarming rate, paying up to 50% above asking price so “average” people can’t buy them. Why is BlackRock interested in overpaying for modest, single family homes? In a Twitter thread posted by user Culturalhusbandry, it’s noted:
“Black Rock, Vanguard, and State Street control 20 trillion dollars worth of assets. Blackrock alone has a 10 billion a year surplus. That means with 5-20% down they can get mortgages on 130-170k homes every year. Or they can outright buy 30k homes per year. Just Blackrock.
… Now imagine every major institute doing this, because they are. It can be such a fast sweeping action that 30yrs may be overshooting it. They may accomplish feudalism in 15 years.”
If the average American is pushed out of the housing market, and most of the available housing is owned by investment groups and corporations, you become beholden to them as your landlord. You’ll then own nothing, not even your home. All items and resources are to be used by the collective, while actual ownership is restricted to an upper stratum of social class.
Schwab Wasn’t the Mastermind Behind WEF
If Schwab is the most dangerous person alive today, his predecessors deserve honorable mentions. In an investigative report by journalist Johnny Vedmore, it’s revealed that Schwab wasn’t the mastermind behind WEF and The Great Reset.
That honor goes to his three mentors — John K. Galbraith, a Canadian-American economist, diplomat and public policy maker, Herman Kahn, who created concepts on nuclear deterrence that became official military policy, and Henry A. Kissinger, who recruited Schwab at a Harvard international seminar, which was funded by the U.S. CIA.
“If you have a decent knowledge of Klaus Schwab’s history, you will know that he attended Harvard in the 1960s where he would meet then-professor Henry A. Kissinger, a man with whom Schwab would form a lifelong friendship,” Vedmore explained.
“My research indicates that the World Economic Forum is not a European creation. In reality, it is instead an operation which emanates from the public policy grandees of the Kennedy, Johnson and Nixonian eras of American politics; all of whom had ties to the Council on Foreign Relations and the associated “Round Table” Movement, with a supporting role played by the Central Intelligence Agency.
There were three extremely powerful and influential men, Kissinger among them, who would lead Klaus Schwab towards their ultimate goal of complete American Empire-aligned global domination via the creation of social and economic policies.
In addition, two of the men were at the core of manufacturing the ever-present threat of global thermonuclear war … their paths would cross and coalesce during the 1960s … they recruited Klaus Schwab through a CIA-funded program, and … they were the real driving force behind the creation of the World Economic Forum.”
Your Free Will Is Under Attack
Environmental pollution, disease and cyberattacks are being used to generate fear in order to keep the population compliant. Another part of The Great Reset is a reset of the economy, including jobs. Many across the U.S. are facing unemployment if they do not choose to take a genetic therapy experiment in the form of a COVID-19 shot.
It’s clear that the COVID-19 pandemic has created “a unique window of opportunity” to rapidly usher in the Great Reset, which involves changing everything from future global relations and the direction of national economies to “the priorities of societies, the nature of business models and the management of a global commons.”
Part of the plan involves the Fourth Industrial Revolution, which Schwab has been discussing since at least 2016 and “is characterized by a fusion of technologies that is blurring the lines between the physical, digital, and biological spheres.”
In terms of government, the Revolution will bring new technological powers that allow for increased population control via “pervasive surveillance systems and the ability to control digital infrastructure.” Meanwhile, while people are busy worrying about the orchestrated threats that are out to get them, technocrats are working on how to remove the essence of what it means to be human — namely, free will.
“Humans are now hackable animals,” Harari said. “Humans have this soul or spirit and they have free will, and nobody knows what’s happening inside me, so whatever I choose, whether in the election or whether in the supermarket, this is my free will — that’s over.” It’s urgent that we all take steps to remain free, sovereign individuals, which can be as straightforward as:
Be guided by your own critical thinking and what your heart and soul know is right
Choose bravery over obedience
“We are in the process of either The Great Reset or the Great Awakening,” Sears points out, “and the choice isn’t Klaus Schwab’s. The choice is yours.”
In Norway a full one third of the population works for the State, and if you were to take into consideration those whose businesses support the State’s bureaucracy that percentage would be much higher. While In Canada employment in the public sector accounts for 20% of employed Canadians. When an entire nation is built on Dialectical Materialism a State controlled economy isn’t merely a policy, it has become a religion. It is the fulfillment of the Biblical metaphor for the Tower of Babel. It will collapse in on itself in confusion. So let us dive into how this came to be.
I believe there are certain unbreakable spiritual principles which result in ruin if contradicted.
From an advertisement entitled “Career opportunities await with Canada’s largest employer: The Government of Canada”
Since the private sector is the only sector which generates revenue rather than merely spending it, how is this sustainable? Well, the simple answer is that it isn’t. Which is why we are in such dire circumstances especially given the fact that unlike the private sector the public sector has no reason to return value for the money it spends since it isn’t held accountable to the public for operating efficiently. I have witnessed firsthand what happened when a senior bureaucrat attempted to address this issue and it was not pretty. How bureaucracy operates is living proof that no good deed will go unpunished.
But what is dialectical materialism and where did it originate? Dialectical materialism is the foundational principle of socialist doctrine formulated by Marx and Engels. In short it posits the belief that life is merely a material struggle for limited resources, a zero-sum game. The State which has adopted this as a national economic policy invariably will seek to dominate its citizens. There is no better way to dominate the citizen than to employ them. This ensures obedience and compliance if public sector workers hope to keep their jobs.
The Enemy of our soul is the great counterfeiter. “Hath God said?”, is his default position. He is the first, the foremost, and the leading critic of Godly order. Critical Theory is proof that he is at work among men and with his lies is leading men to deny God. Critical Theory is an utterly materialistic view of life which intersectionally categorizes mankind in a godless manner. It refuses to recognize that we are all created in God’s image through its use of identity politics. Critical Theory is a means of socially engineering mankind into Satan’s image. And as perverse as this sounds, the rejection of the need for a spiritual connection with God does not result in atheism, it results in Satan worship. Which is why Satanic ritual being on full display in this year’s Grammy Awards.
But what do the Scriptures reveal about the material realm in its relationship with Godliness?
From Matthew 6: (NASB)
25 “For this reason I say to you, do not be worried about your life, as to what you will eat or what you will drink; nor for your body, as to what you will put on. Is life not more than food, and the body more than clothing?
26 Look at the birds of the sky, that they do not sow, nor reap, nor gather crops into barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not much more important than they?
27 And which of you by worrying can add a single day to his life’s span?
28 And why are you worried about clothing? Notice how the lilies of the field grow; they do not labor nor do they spin thread for cloth,
29 yet I say to you that not even Solomon in all his glory clothed himself like one of these.
30 But if God so clothes the grass of the field, which is alive today and tomorrow is thrown into the furnace, will He not much more clothe you? You of little faith!
31 Do not worry then, saying, ‘What are we to eat?’ or ‘What are we to drink?’ or ‘What are we to wear for clothing?’
32 For the Gentiles eagerly seek all these things; for your heavenly Father knows that you need all these things.
33 But seek first His kingdom and His righteousness, and all these things will be provided to you.
So on to today’s theme, why Hauge is more important then ever to remember as an example of someone who sought first God’s Kingdom, created a national spiritual revival, and saw many material things added unto a nation which was suffering greatly under material want.
“Hans Nielsen Hauge (1771-1824), a lay preacher who spent decades promoting revival in Norway, helped to transform the religious and social landscape of his homeland. Hauge’s story was featured in the June 14, 1947, issue of the Pentecostal Evangel. Hauge’s testimony demonstrated that Pentecostals’ emphasis on reform and spiritual renewal had firm roots in the broader Christian tradition.
In 1796, Hauge experienced a spiritual awakening (which he termed “spirit baptism”) while he was ploughing his father’s farm. This experience with God transformed Hauge’s life. He began studying the Bible and shared the gospel and his testimony wherever he found an audience. He preached with great power and insisted that each person should have “living faith.”
According to Hauge, church membership alone did not make a person a Christian. At the time, exceedingly few people attended State churches. In the capital city of Christiania, which had a population of about 10,000, evidence shows that only about 20 people attended regular services in the State church.
Hauge inspired a large movement which revived Christianity in Norway. It is estimated that half of Norwegians experienced salvation under the ministry of Hauge and his fellow evangelists. Hauge not only promoted lay ministry, he also encouraged women to share the gospel. The first female preacher in the Haugean movement, Sara Oust, began preaching in 1799. For the next 100 years, Norway became known as “a land of revivals.”
Hauge not only brought a spiritual rebirth to Norway, but also an economic revival. He established numerous factories and mills and is credited with bringing the industrial revolution to his nation.
The informal network of Christians developed by Hauge challenged the authority of the Lutheran State church. Norway did not have freedom of religious assembly, and it was illegal to hold a religious meeting without a licensed minister present. Although he never departed from Lutheran theology, Hauge was arrested at least fourteen times and endured great suffering in jail. His health failed in prison, resulting in Hauge’s premature death.”
His converts were responsible for the drafting of the Norwegian Constitution on May 17th, 1814, when Norway elected a Danish prince as King. This constitution brought responsible government to Norway with limited suffrage. May the 17th, known as Syttende Mai, is celebrated yearly as Norway’s national day. Oddly, Hauge created the spiritual landscape which gave birth to modern Norway, yet spirituality his legacy has been rejected in favour of the dialectical materialism of Marx and Engels.
Hauge demonstrated two things, that no revival has ever successfully been contained within an established religious institution. From the time of Christ until now every single spiritual awakening forced the revivalists to leave their religious institutions to establish something new. And in every instance the old order persecuted the revivalists because the old order failed to recognize a work of God.
Luke 5 (NASB):
33 And they said to Him, “The disciples of John often fast and offer prayers, the disciples of the Pharisees also do the same, but Yours eat and drink.”
34 And Jesus said to them, “You cannot make the attendants of the groom fast while the groom is with them, can you?
35 But the days will come; and when the groom is taken away from them, then they will fast in those days.”
36 And He was also telling them a parable: “No one tears a piece of cloth from a new garment and puts it on an old garment; otherwise he will both tear the new, and the patch from the new garment will not match the old.
37 And no one pours new wine into old wineskins; otherwise the new wine will burst the skins and it will be spilled out, and the skins will be ruined.
38 But new wine must be put into fresh wineskins.
39 And no one, after drinking old wine wants new; for he says, ‘The old is fine.’”
It is the remarkable frailty of man that as soon as he refuses to place the Kingdom of God first that he will return to his old ways of viewing life as a zero-sum game over which he will seek to garner absolute control since trust in God will be absent from his life. And that need for domination now infects the leaders all throughout the Western World putting into question whether the experiment in responsible constitutional government of the people and by the people can exist in a materialistic world that rejects the need to seek God and place His Kingdom first and foremost. Here is a sober warning from the Scriptures with a word of admonition from renowned psychologist and academic, Dr. Jordan B Peterson.
Exodus 9:
34 But when Pharaoh saw that the rain and the hail and the thunder had stopped, he sinned again and hardened his heart, he and his servants.
35 So Pharaoh’s heart was hardened, and he did not let the sons of Israel go, just as the Lord had spoken through Moses.
“Here you see the narcissism and psychopathy of tyranny. One of the hallmarks of psychopathy as well as the narcissism that accompanies it is an absolute failure to learn from experience. And so, it is quite interesting because you think of the psychopath as someone who takes advantage of others for his own benefit, but the psychopath also takes advantage of himself for his own benefit. And so, psychopaths always betray their future selves.
And so, it is a very counterproductive mode of existence. And they do that by getting into the same trouble over and over again.
Join me and a whole host of renowned scholars as we debate, discuss, and explore the Book of Exodus: https://bit.ly/3OJKQx2”
We must remember the sacrifices made by Godly men and women who sought first the Kingdom of God and not wonder why Godly order and responsible government dies in the absence of that spiritual quest.
"Put on the full armor of God, so that you will be able to stand firm against the schemes of the devil."
Ephesians 6:13
"Therefore, put on the full armor of God, so that when the day of evil comes, you may be able to stand your ground, and after you have done everything, to stand."
1 Peter 5:9
"But resist him, firm in your faith, knowing that the same experiences of suffering are being accomplished by your brethren who are in the world."
1 Corinthians 15:58
"Be steadfast, immovable, always abounding in the work of the Lord."
Philippians 1:27
"Conduct yourselves in a manner worthy of the gospel of Christ, so that whether I come and see you or remain absent, I will hear of you that you are standing firm in one spirit, with one mind striving together for the faith of the gospel."
1 Corinthians 16:13
"Be on the alert, stand firm in the faith, act like men, be strong."
Philippians 4:1
"Therefore, my beloved brethren whom I long to see, my joy and crown, in this way stand firm in the Lord, my beloved."
1 Corinthians 14:26
“What is the outcome then, brothers and sisters? When you assemble, each one has a psalm, has a teaching, has a revelation, has a tongue, has an interpretation. All things are to be done for edification.”
