The adage those who don’t learn from history are doomed to
repeat it is only partially accurate. It would be more correct to state that
those who are unaware of history cannot avoid making history’s mistakes if they
are not aware of what mistakes have been made. I suppose in an age when the
entire cosmic library of human knowledge is accessible through our smart phones,
we ought to be more aware, more cautious, and more unwilling to repeat
humanities greatest failures, but alas that is not the case. I would wager few
of you reading this have ever spent time searching the vast scope of knowledge
that has been digitized and made accessible through aps such as Bing AI. So
today we will change topics, switch lanes, and move on to examine how, what,
why, when, and where the West got into bed with Communist China so that
American industrialists could access China’s cheap labour pool.
I came upon a meme today on social media featuring a group photograph
of America’s past Presidents up to the Obama administration which included the
two Bushes, Bill Clinton, and Jimmy Carter standing with Obama which bore the text,
“This is why all your stuff comes from China”. To which I added when sharing
it to my own profile, “Never forget. This is the legacy of Kissinger and
Nixon who when creating detente with Communist China opened China's cheap
labour market to American industrialists thereby making a pact with the devil.
The outcome of this détente is proof America wasn't really fighting communism
in Vietnam since it was China who had funded the Vietcong, rather Kissinger and
Nixon ended up helping to fund communism by handing over our supply chain to
our ideological enemies allowing the Communist Chinese to profit from Western
Capitalism.”
Today I hope to unpack these ideas to examine the timeline
of the Vietnam War, the American publics reaction to the conflict, moreover the
real strategy of those who were pulling the strings behind the scenes which led
to untold loss of human life and a stain on the reputation of America pursuing
just and winnable conflicts, which is a problem that has plagued America’s
military ever since. More importantly, how we became dependent on our enemies
to supply the West with cheap goods of poor quality. And worse, how we got into
bed with multinational conglomerates in the pharmaceutical industry to fund
them to use Chinese laboratories under the control of the CCP to create
bioweapons and mRNA messenger inoculations that are tainted with DNA.
Let’s begin with an estimate from Bing AI as to
the war’s cost in human life:
Estimates of the total number of deaths during the Vietnam
War vary widely due to different time periods covered by the studies and
whether casualties in Cambodia and Laos were included in the estimates. Here
are some estimates:
A 1975 US Senate subcommittee estimated around 1.4 million
civilian casualties in South Vietnam because of the war, including 415,000
deaths.
An estimate by the Department of Defense after the war gave
a figure of 1.2 million civilian casualties, including 195,000 deaths.
Guenter Lewy in 1978 estimated 1,353,000 total deaths in
North and South Vietnam during the period 1965–1974.
A 1995 demographic study in Population and Development
Review calculated 791,000–1,141,000 war-related Vietnamese deaths, both
soldiers and civilians, for all of Vietnam from 1965–75.
In 1995, Vietnam released its official estimate of the
number of people killed during the Vietnam War: as many as 2,000,000 civilians
on both sides and some 1,100,000 North Vietnamese and Viet Cong fighters.
How and why did America become involved? The
U.S. involvement in Vietnam began due to a combination of factors:
The Domino Theory:
Beginning in the mid-1950s, the American foreign policy establishment tended to
view the situation in Southeast Asia in terms of the Domino Theory. The basic
principle was that if French Indochina (Vietnam was still a French colony) fell
to the communist insurgency, the expansion of communism throughout Asia would
be likely to continue unchecked.
Anti-Communist Fervor: On
the home front, beginning in 1949, fear of domestic communists gripped America.
The country spent much of the 1950s under the influence of the Red Scare, led
by the virulently anti-communist Senator Joseph McCarthy.
Support to Viet Minh:
Joseph Stalin and Mao Zedong’s pledge in 1950 to support the Viet Minh
guerrilla forces in the First Indochina War against France’s colonial rule.
U.S. War with Japan in the Pacific: The
U.S. war with Japan in the Pacific also played a role in the U.S. involvement
in Vietnam.
These factors led to the U.S. sending its first military
advisers to help the French battle the communists of Northern Vietnam in 1950.
The U.S. involvement escalated over time, with President Lyndon Johnson
dramatically escalating U.S. involvement in the conflict, authorizing a series
of intense bombing campaigns and committing hundreds of thousands of U.S.
ground troops to the fight.
Mcarthy’s mistake, he ignored a problem hidden
in plain sight. The source of Neo-Marxist indoctrination:
Senator Joseph McCarthy is known for his campaign against
alleged communists in the U.S. government and other institutions during the
early 1950s, a period known as the "Red Scare". He alleged that
numerous communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers had infiltrated the
United States federal government, universities, film industry, and elsewhere.
However, it’s important to note that while McCarthy made broad accusations, his
focus was primarily on the U.S. government, particularly the State Department
and the Army.
There could be several reasons why McCarthy did
not specifically target universities to the same extent:
Focus on Government:
McCarthy’s primary focus was on rooting out alleged communists within the U.S.
government. He believed that these individuals posed a direct threat to
national security.
Public Perception:
Universities might not have been seen as influential or dangerous as the
government or the military. Therefore, McCarthy might have chosen to focus his
efforts where he believed they would have the most impact.
Tactics and Strategy: McCarthy’s
tactics involved making broad, sweeping accusations without substantial proof.
It’s possible that he felt this approach would be less effective in the
academic world.
Ideological indoctrination into radical belief systems is
most effective when it targets youth since they are the most impressionable and
mouldable. The anti-war movement of the 60’s had many justifiable reasons for
opposing the war however these reasons became the tools which were exploited by
Neo-Marxist agitators many of whom were University professors. Radicals like
Saul Alinsky coined the phrase, “The real action is your target's reaction.”
Many future high ranking American politicians including Bill Clinton, Hillory
Clinton, and Barrack Obama were heavily influenced by Alinsky. Although Barack
Obama was not a direct disciple of Saul Alinsky, he was influenced by Alinsky’s
ideas. In the mid-1980s, Obama worked for the Developing Communities Project, a
group from Chicago’s South Side whose techniques were inspired by Alinsky. He
received a comprehensive course in Saul Alinsky during his years as a community
organizer in Chicago, an experience Obama recalled as “the best education he
ever had.”
By ignoring the Academy McCarthy disregarded the real
source for the Neo-Marxist ideological possession that has laid hold of the American
WOKE left today.
China’s involvement in Vietnam:
China provided significant support to the Viet Cong during
the Vietnam War which included:
Military Aid: China provided
extensive logistical, training, and material aid to North Vietnam, which
supported the Viet Cong.
Advisors and Training: In
April 1950, the Viet Minh formally requested military aid including equipment,
advisors, and training. The People’s Republic of China (PRC) began to send
their advisors and later formed the Chinese Military Advisory Group (CMAG) to
assist the Viet Minh.
Financial Support:
During Ho Chi Minh’s official visit to China in 1955, Beijing agreed to provide
a grant of $200 million to be used to build various projects.
It’s important to note that the support was not just
financial but also included military and strategic assistance. The Chinese
government saw their involvement in the Vietnam War as part of a larger
geopolitical strategy and an international obligation.
The turning point, the Tet Offensive:
The Tet Offensive was a major escalation and one of the
largest military campaigns of the Vietnam War, launched by the North Vietnamese
and Viet Cong forces against the South Vietnamese and their American allies in
January 1968.
The Americans and their Vietnamese allies fought back and
repelled most of the attacks. However, the offensive had a significant
psychological impact on the American public and the media, as it exposed the
vulnerability of the U.S. and South Vietnamese forces and the strength and
determination of the enemy.
The Tet Offensive also eroded the credibility of President
Lyndon B. Johnson and General William Westmoreland, who had previously claimed
that the war was going well, and that victory was near. The offensive sparked a
wave of anti-war protests and demonstrations in the U.S. and increased the
pressure on Johnson to seek a negotiated settlement.
The aftermath of the Tet Offensive:
According to some sources, the South Vietnamese planned to
counterattack after the Tet Offensive, but they were not stopped by the U.S.
That is the official story at least. However, I worked with a Vietnamese Intelligence
Officer who was a Captain in the South Vietnamese Armed Forces. He told me that
the Americans threatened them if they were to launch a major counter-offensive
into the north. In any case, the South faced strong resistance from the North
Vietnamese and Viet Cong forces, who continued to fight in some areas for weeks
or months after the initial offensive.
In the aftermath of the Tet Offensive the South Vietnamese did
receive support from their allies, such as the U.S., Australia, South Korea,
New Zealand, and Thailand, who helped them repel the attacks and regain control
of the cities and towns that had been captured by the enemy.
So, the Tet Offensive, despite being a military defeat for
the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong, had a significant political and
psychological impact on the U.S. and South Vietnamese. It exposed the gap
between the optimistic claims of the U.S. military and the harsh realities of
the war, and it eroded the public support and confidence in the U.S.
involvement in Vietnam which is why the Tet Offensive is widely considered as a
turning point in the Vietnam War, as it marked the beginning of the slow and
painful American withdrawal from the region.
Kissinger, the greatest of all Besserwissers:
The Vietnam War had started on November 1, 1955, while The
Paris Peace Accords marked the beginning of the end of the war. They were
signed on January 27, 1973. Therefore, the war had been going on for a little
over 17 years before the Accords were arranged.
Henry Kissinger, who served as National Security Advisor
and later Secretary of State under President Richard Nixon, played a
significant role in both escalating and ending the Vietnam War.
1. **Escalation of the War**: Kissinger
controversially hid the 1969 bombings of Cambodia and Laos from Congress, which
escalated the Vietnam War.
2. **Secret Negotiations**: Nixon granted Kissinger
permission to conduct secret negotiations with the North Vietnamese. These
negotiations were part of Nixon's strategy to end the war and bring "peace
with honor".
3. **Paris Peace Accords**: After years of talks
with North Vietnam, Kissinger negotiated the Paris Peace Accords of 1973. These
accords led to a ceasefire and the withdrawal of American troops.
4. **Nobel Prize**: Despite the controversy
surrounding his role in the war, Kissinger won the Nobel Prize for negotiating
the Paris Peace Accords.
Kissinger's role in the Vietnam War was complex, multifaceted,
and certainly contradictory, which is why his actions during this period
continue to be a subject of much debate.
Henry Kissinger made a secret trip to China in 1971. This
trip was a significant diplomatic breakthrough that paved the way for Nixon's
historic visit to China the following year.
During his secret trip, Kissinger feigned illness while at
a meeting in Pakistan and flew undercover to Beijing for these unprecedented
talks. The talks led to an agreement that President Nixon would visit China in
February 1972 marking the first time a U.S. president had visited the People's
Republic of China. Nixon’s visit was a seminal step in normalizing relations
between the two countries whose forces were still engaged in military conflict
in South-East Asia.
Kissinger's secret trip and the subsequent visit by Nixon
were part of a strategic shift in U.S. foreign policy, which sought to leverage
China as a counterbalance to the Soviet Union during the Cold War. This
approach was known as "triangular diplomacy" and was a key aspect of
Nixon and Kissinger's foreign policy strategy.
During Henry Kissinger's secret trip to China in 1971 he discussed
the Vietnam War with Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai. Kissinger pressed Zhou to end
the supply of arms to North Vietnam. However, the talks did not lead to any
immediate breakthroughs. Zhou told Kissinger that North Vietnam was playing off
China against the Soviet Union, and to cut off North Vietnam would allow it to
fall under Soviet influence. Despite these discussions, the Chinese did not
help Nixon end the war at that time. As I mentioned, these talks were part of a
broader strategy to improve U.S.-China relations and to leverage China as a
counterbalance to the Soviet Union during the Cold War.
The end of US involvement in Vietnam and the
ultimate end of the conflict with North Vietnam annexing the south under centralized
communist control:
The end of the Vietnam War was precipitated by several key
events and factors:
1. **Paris Peace Accords**: The Paris Peace Accords,
signed on January 27, 1973, marked the beginning of the end of the war. The
accords led to a ceasefire and the withdrawal of American troops.
2. **Vietnamization**: This was a policy of the
Nixon administration to end U.S. involvement in the war by transferring all
military responsibilities to South Vietnam.
3. **Public Opinion**: The American public's growing
opposition to the war, particularly after the Tet Offensive, put pressure on
the U.S. government to seek an end to the conflict.
4. **Congressional Action**: The U.S. Congress
passed the War Powers Resolution in 1973, which limited the president's ability
to conduct war without congressional approval.
5. **Fall of Saigon**: The fall of Saigon to North
Vietnamese forces on April 30, 1975, marked the end of the war.
The significance of the role
did Kissinger and Nixon played in opening Communist China up to American
businessmen?
Here are some key points:
1. **Secret Diplomacy**: Kissinger, as Nixon's
National Security Advisor, made a secret trip to China in 1971. This trip paved
the way for Nixon's historic visit to China the following year.
2. **Normalization of Relations**: Nixon's visit in
1972 marked the first time a U.S. president had visited the People's Republic
of China. This visit was an important step in normalizing relations between the
two countries.
3. **Geopolitical Strategy**: The opening of China
was part of a broader geopolitical strategy known as "triangular
diplomacy" that sought to leverage China as a counterbalance to the Soviet
Union during the Cold War.
4. **Economic Opportunities**: The normalization of
relations between the U.S. and China opened new economic opportunities for
American businesses. In other words, new economic opportunities which funded
communism and betrayed the American worker.
It's important to note that while Nixon and Kissinger
played crucial roles in opening China, the process of fully integrating Communist
China into the global economy took many years and involved the efforts of many
other individuals and institutions.
How America helped to fund a global pandemic to
assist in fulfilling communism ultimate goal, to collapse free market
capitalism!
The U.S. government, specifically the National Institutes
of Health (NIH) and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID),
provided funding to several research institutions, including the Wuhan
Institute of Virology in China. This funding was part of a grant to EcoHealth
Alliance, a global environmental health nonprofit organization. The grant,
worth $2,168,345, was used between 2014 and 2021 for various research purposes,
including risky gain-of-function experiments with coronaviruses at the Wuhan
Institute of Virology.
It's important to note that the funding was not solely for
the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and not all of the funding took place under
one administration. For instance, approximately $700,000 of the total grant was
approved under the Trump administration.
The purpose of this funding was to support research into
bat coronaviruses, which was considered important for preventing and preparing
for potential future pandemics. However, the funding and the research it
supported have been the subject of controversy and investigation, particularly
in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted global
supply chains, including those between the West and China. Here are some key
challenges:
1. **Manufacturing Disruptions**: The pandemic led
to unscheduled closures of manufacturing and distribution facilities, creating
bottlenecks in supply lines. This was particularly impactful in China, a major
global manufacturing hub.
2. **Transportation Issues**: There were also
disruptions in transportation, with record numbers of shipping containers lost
at sea.
3. **Increased Demand**: Changes in consumer
behavior led to irregular demand for certain products, further straining supply
chains.
4. **Reliance on Single Sources**: Many companies
found they were overly reliant on single sources (like China) for their
supplies. When Chinese factories closed in early 2020, manufacturers struggled
to switch to other suppliers.
5. **Geopolitical Tensions**: The U.S.-China trade
war and China's zero-Covid restrictions have added to the complexities of
recovering global supply chains.
Recovering and restructuring these supply chains post-Covid
is a complex task. Companies are being advised to make their networks more
resilient by diversifying suppliers, stockpiling essential materials, and
exploring production-process improvements. Some are considering other
manufacturing hubs such as Vietnam, Mexico, and India. However, the difficulty
of extricating ourselves from CCP led China is a process which could last for decades.
The invisible hand of God as opposed to the
totalizing enterprise of central planners:
The Invisible hand metaphor was introduced by the
18th-century Scottish philosopher and economist Adam Smith. The phrase characterizes
the instruments through which advantageous social and economic effects arise
from the compounded self-interested practices of individuals, whose intents weren’t
to bring about such outcomes. The notion of the invisible hand has been
employed in economics and other social sciences to explain the division of
labour, the emergence of a medium of exchange, the growth of wealth, the
patterns (such as price levels) manifest in market competition, and the
institutions and rules of society. Most importantly, it has been used to argue
that free markets, made up of economic agents who act in their own
self-interest, deliver the best possible social and economic outcomes.
Smith used the phrase on two occasions to exemplify how society
benefits from the combined interactions of individuals who had no intention to
bring about such a good. In Part IV, chapter 1, of The Theory of Moral
Sentiments (1759), he explains that, as wealthy individuals in pursuing their
own interests in turn employ others to labour for them, in this they “are led
by an invisible hand”. In Book IV, chapter 2, of An Inquiry into the Nature and
Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776), Smith argued against import
restrictions and explained how individuals prefer domestic over foreign
investments, Smith uses the phrase to summarize how self-interested actions are
coordinated in such a way that they advance public interests. In those two
instances, he revealed a complex and beneficial structure which he explained by
invoking basic principles of human nature and economic interaction.
God is the invisible hand and Jesus Christ is the
mighty right hand of God!
In all cases of central planning, in all instances of diplomacy
where our ideological enemies are pitted against one another, in the totalizing
monetary operations of the global banking industry, in the monopolizing multinational
conglomerates which operate as though they are above the law, and within global
humanitarian organizations who manipulate humanity like pieces on a chess board,
we see one thing which is undeniably true. Those who engage in such activities have
placed themselves in a god-like position. They claim to have knowledge and
control over humanity that is antihuman to its core. These people are narcissistically
delusional in terms of their ideological pathology. They ascribe to themselves almost
God-like powers. They play humanity as pieces in a global game of Monopoly since
they falsely believe that the world God gave us is incapable of sustaining His
creation. Which is why they constantly use the word “sustainable” to describe
their totalizing enterprise. In this episode I have clearly demonstrated their
actions have resulted in untold loss of human life, pandemics, transference of wealth
to the uber wealthy, misappropriation of public funds, damage to the Rule of
Law and the sovereignty of nation states, as well as an emerging form of
oppression that is kid gloved Marxism, all because these Besserwissers cannot
believe in the invisible Hand of God.
The only possible totalizing enterprise is that of God for
in Him there is no want, no lacking, nor insufficiency. He is all knowing, all
powerful, and since He exists beyond time and is the creator of all things, it
is in Him that we move and live and have our being.
Philippians 2:
7 but emptied himself, taking the form of a servant,
being made in the likeness of men;
8 and being found in fashion as a man, he
humbled himself, becoming obedient even unto death, yea, the death of the
cross.
My final thoughts:
So, you can see the dangers of attempting to play God.
Kissinger both acerbated the Vietnam War when he bombed Cambodia and Laos then
made a deal with the very devil, he had pitted himself against only to get into
bed with the devil to allow our enemies to unleash a plague upon the world. For
this mankind in his own narcissistic hubris gave a Nobel Peace prize to Kissinger
for arranging the Paris Accord. A prize that was founded by Alfred Nobel, a Swedish
chemist, inventor, engineer, and businessman who, besides being known for the
Nobel Peace prize, is best known for inventing dynamite. Nobel had bequeathed
his fortune to establish the Nobel Prize, a fortune that was made by blowing
people into smithereens. Was the Nobel Prize a prize for peace or the pieces
into which Nobel’s dynamite blew his fellow man? The utter insanity of thinking
that we can play God and not pay for our Satanic ideation! Idea pathogens that attempt
to replace God with man can only result in creating hell on earth! Remember brothers
and sisters that Jesus defeated the enemy of our souls as the Son of Man not as
the Son of God. He was the only perfect man. Man cannot create his own value
structure capable of bringing justice and peace to this present age. Nobel Peace
prize my hairy heinie, we are fallen creatures full of ourselves and narcissistic
Satanic delusions. Empty yourselves of pride and vanity and come to Christ. There
can be no peace or salvation without the Prince of Peace!
The U.S. government, specifically the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the U.S. AThe U.S. government, specifically the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the U.S. The U.S. government, specifically the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), provided funding to several research institutions, including the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China¹. This funding was part of a grant to EcoHealth Alliance, a global environmental health nonprofit organization². The grant, worth $2,168,345, was used between 2014 and 2021 for various research purposes, including risky gain-of-function experiments with coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology¹.
It's important to note that the funding was not solely for the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and not all of the funding took place under one administration². For instance, approximately $700,000 of the total grant was approved under the Trump administration².
The purpose of this funding was to support research into bat coronaviruses, which was considered important for preventing and preparing for potential future pandemics¹². However, the funding and the research it supported have been the subject of controversy and investigation, particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic¹².
Source: Conversation with Bing, 2024-02-07
(1) US taxpayers funded $2M for research in Wuhan, China: report. https://nypost.com/2023/06/14/us-taxpayers-funded-2-million-for-research-in-wuhan-report/.
(2) Did Obama Admin Give Wuhan Laboratory a $3.7 Million Grant?. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/obama-admin-wuhan-lab-grant/.
(3) Pentagon gave $37M+ to Chinese Wuhan lab-linked firm: Report. https://americanmilitarynews.com/2021/06/pentagon-gave-37m-to-chinese-wuhan-lab-linked-firm-report/.
(4) NIH admits US funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan - New York Post. https://nypost.com/2021/10/21/nih-admits-us-funded-gain-of-function-in-wuhan-despite-faucis-repeated-denials/.
No comments:
Post a Comment