In an age of delusion, I aim to provide Christians with the tools needed to counter the enemy's lies. Postmodernism, Critical Race Theory, Diversity, Inclusiveness, Equity, WOKE, Net-Zero Carbon are all variations on a Neo-Marxist theme. Namely the belief that life is a zero-sum game, a Malthusian nightmare where resources are so finite that the state must redistribute them. This channel is dedicated to providing you with the meat of the Word of God sorely lacking in Christian circles today.
16 Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of
wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves.
The conservative movement has a fatal blind spot. They are
screaming bloody murder in reaction to the myriads of things their Postmodern opponents
do but to little avail. Why, you say? The Postmodernists responsible for
attacking reason itself believe in "their truth" as though truth
itself is a subjective matter. Rational conservatives often fail to understand
that Postmodernism is actually a religion which requires no proof of its
validity. This is why its converts embrace it with blind faith and religious zeal.
I was watching Bridge City News anchor Hal Roberts interview
Reverend Alistair Petrie of Partnership Ministries last night. I found the
interview disconcerting since neither Hal or Alistair appeared to have a grasp
of the nature of the ideological possession that is causing our current political,
moral and spiritual crisis. They spoke in depth of the results of radical policies
being fomented today by Postmodernists and Cultural Marxists, but never once
did they identify the ideological sources for the disruption in society and good
government. They simply kept referring of the need to trust in God in the midst
of this chaos. Now, I emphatically agree with the need to trust God but what are
we to trust Him for if not to understand the nature of the false doctrines
which are causing this chaos? But they didn’t deal with the heresies behind the
chaos. So, let us examine how the church in the First Millenia reacted to such
issues? In the early Church, there were **seven ecumenical councils** that
addressed false doctrines and clarified Christian orthodoxy. These councils
are:
1. **First Council of Nicaea** (325)
2. **First Council of Constantinople** (381)
3. **Council of Ephesus** (431)
4. **Council of Chalcedon** (451)
5. **Second Council of Constantinople** (553)
6. **Third Council of Constantinople** (680–681)
7. **Second Council of Nicaea** (787)¹².
These councils played a crucial role in defining key aspects
of Christian theology and combating heresies.
**Postmodern relativism** is a philosophical concept that
emerged from postmodernism, a movement characterized by broad skepticism,
subjectivism, and relativism. It challenges the idea of absolute truths and
asserts that truth is relative to the individual or culture¹².
In essence, postmodern relativism suggests that what is
considered true or right for one person or group may not be true or right for
another. This perspective denies the existence of universal truths and
emphasizes the importance of context, perspective, and interpretation¹³.
The other major source of what we can broadly refer to as
the WOKE thinking behind our prevailing cultural crisis is known as Cultural
Marxist Critical Theory. Postmodern relativism and cultural Marxist critical
theory have some overlapping ideas but also significant differences, which can
lead to contradictions.
**Postmodern relativism** emphasizes that truth and moral
values are relative to individual perspectives or cultural contexts. It
challenges the idea of universal truths and often focuses on deconstructing
established narratives and power structures².
**Cultural Marxist critical theory**, on the other hand, is
rooted in Marxist thought and focuses on critiquing and changing society by
addressing power dynamics, social hierarchies, and oppression. It seeks to
understand how cultural institutions perpetuate inequality and aims to promote
social justice³.
While both theories critique traditional power structures,
they differ in their approach to truth and knowledge. Postmodern relativism's
emphasis on the relativity of truth can be seen as contradictory to cultural
Marxist critical theory's goal of uncovering and addressing objective social
injustices¹³.
So, the two main sources of the prevailing ideological
possession contradict one another since Postmodernism states there is no “Grand
Narrative” while Cultural Marxism is in and of itself a “Grand Narrative”. It
obviously requires faith to believe in two things which reason ought to cancel
out but socialists have never worried about such contradictions. Allow me to
refer back to my previous blogs and vodcasts about Hegelian dialectics. Here we
see that Postmodernism is presented as a “thesis”, Cultural Marxism as “antithesis”
and the “synthesis” of both is the merging of two contradictory ideas into a
new reality. This obviously requires faith which leads me back to my first
conclusion, Christianity has been pitted against these heresies and sadly there
is no current ecumenical council willing to take on the task of exposing these
false doctrines that are gnostic mysteries to their core. Only those who have
been initiated into the belief system can possibly comprehend such irrational thinking
and only then when its high priests tell the collective what they mist think,
this is why they despise the individual. In this they have become the metaphorical
manifestation of the Borg from Star Trek where resistance is futile, and you
will be assimilated! (Over my dead body) This is why what we call the “left”
appears crazy to the rational and Godly mind.
But it is odder than even what I have described so far since the main critics of this quasi-religious ideological idiocy are atheists.
Dr. James Lindsay is the founder of the website New Discourses, which is owned
by conservative commentator Michael O'Fallon. Lindsay's video series is also
hosted by Sovereign Nations, O'Fallon's Christian nationalist website. According
to theologian and author David W. Congdon, "framing the left as an
alternative religion has made Lindsay popular among the Christian Right",
yet Lindsay himself is an atheist. And then we have Canada’s own Dr. Gad Saad,
also an atheist, who is renowned for defining the minds of the radical left as parasitized
by bad ideas. Dr. Gad Saad, the host of the enormously popular YouTube show THE
SAAD TRUTH, exposes the bad ideas—what he calls “idea pathogens”—that are
killing common sense and rational debate. Incubated in our universities and
spread through the tyranny of political correctness, these ideas are
endangering our most basic freedoms—including freedom of thought and speech.
Needless to say, it is an indictment on the state of the
Church today that atheists have had to take up the cause of reasoned discourse
to expose the faux religious gnostic nature of the whacky ideas that permeate
every aspect of modern life with Canada’s own Prime Minister as the posterchild
for mind viruses which are responsible for our social, moral, economic and spiritual
ruin. It is long overdue that the Church take up her Cross to go forward as the
Christian soldiers that Christ has called us to be. I for one will never be
silent until the day God takes me home! I will do everything within my power by
God’s good grace to expose the Godless quasi-religious heresies that lie at the
epicentre of our cultural malaise! There is no such thing as an irreligious person
for if we reject God, just as Nietzsche has forewarned, we must become gods
ourselves by invented sacred rituals and games that in our recent past resulted
in the murder of countless millions.
Are you noticing synchronicities more frequently? There is
no such thing as coincidence. We are witnesses to emerging patterns of
illiberal authoritarianism all throughout the Western World. Yet the words of
these authoritarians deconstruct their own arguments even as they demand that
we deny the evidence of our own lying eyes and ears! These oligarchs are
pathologically delusional and violently illiberal. They are committed to using
every means at their disposal to force us to comply to their insane edicts,
policies, and programs while coercing us to ignore the utter failures and negative
outcomes. We are being governed by Marxofascists who promote a totalitarian
global agenda rather than serving the constituents who elected them. This is if
indeed they hold office as a result of a free and open electoral process given
the fact, we now have every reason to doubt that given the biased and ridiculous
testimony recently given by Canada’s own Prime Minister #Justin Trudeau at the foreign
interference inquiry.
In Brian Lilley’s words from an article in the Toronto Sun
entitled, “Justin Trudeau wants Canadians kept in the dark on foreign
interference”:
“Meanwhile, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has
called for names of those involved to be released for more than a year.
Here is the latest from 35,000 feet above the middle of
the USA.
If Justin Trudeau had his way, Canadians would never know
about foreign interference in this country, never mind the names of those
involved. Trudeau made that abundantly clear in his highly partisan appearance
at the Foreign Interference Commission on Wednesday.
In his testimony, Trudeau lashed out at those who leaked
information to the public and explained how this could all be handled without
coming clean to the public.
If you were hopeful that Trudeau would heed the call by
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre to “release the names of all MPs that have
collaborated with foreign interference,” don’t hold your breath. If it were up
to Trudeau, there wouldn’t even be a Foreign Interference Commission.
“There is no question that the criminal who leaked the
information to the media, had a role to play in our decision,” Trudeau said of
the government’s expulsion of Zhao Wei.”
The following comes from Oliver Cromwell’s speech when he dismissed
the Rump parliament in London, England in April 1653 and you should all
consider it seriously.
“It is high time … to put an end to your sitting in this
place, which you have dishonoured by your contempt of all virtue and defiled by
your practice of every vice.
“Ye are a factious crew and enemies to all good government.
“Ye are a pack of mercenary wretches …
“Is there a single virtue now remaining amongst you? Is
there one vice you do not possess?
“Which of you have not bartered your conscience
for bribes? Is there a man (or woman) amongst you that has the least care
for the good of the Commonwealth?
Meanwhile four of Trudeau’s own cabinet ministers have stated
that they will not run for re-election even as their own leader craters the
fortunes of the Liberal Party of Canada. His caucus is in open rebellion with
many backbenchers signing a petition to have the PM resign before the LPC loses
all support. We ought not to forget the famous warning given by Trudeau’s former
Attorney General, Jody Wilson-Raybould who told Trudeau, 'I wish I had never
met you,'. She revealed in her book that on the day Prime Minister Justin
Trudeau formally removed her as justice minister and attorney general, that she
approached her successor at the cabinet swearing-in ceremony to deliver a
cryptic warning. First, she congratulated David Lametti on his new role and
offered him with her assistance in the transition. “Then, purposefully, with
(Privy Council Clerk) Michael Wernick standing within earshot, I offered
Lametti a warning: ‘Be careful, all is not what it seems,'” Wilson-Raybould
writes in her new book, Indian in the Cabinet. “I looked directly at the clerk when
I said it. Lametti replied, ‘Noted’.” The Premier of Alberta Danielle Smith has
just warned the nation that she fears Trudeau will become more dangerous before
he is “punted” just as a cornered animal is most vicious when it has been cornered.
After all, even rats have sharp teeth. Ethics scholar Dr. Julie Ponesse has
produced lectures about the "normalizing of corruption" under Trudeau’s
government who have sold their consciences for bribes. If ever there was a
catch phrase which sums up Trudeau's reign of authoritarian overreach the love
of bribes must be the most fitting.
We need to remember that the principal weapon that radical
social collectivists have in their arsenal of dirty tricks is to accuse their
ideological opponents of the very things for which they themselves are guilty. Postmodernists
are demanding that history be rewritten with the specific intent of ensuring
that it is repeated. The post-information age, so-called smart technology, and
the social "sciences" have coalesced in agreement providing the ideal
conditions for creating the perfect authoritarian social collectivist dystopia.
Here are a few of the reasons as to why this has become an inevitability.
Postmodern Relativism is an attack on the literal meaning of
words as well as on the value of Western culture over the murderous medieval
tribalism that our leaders are deliberately importing unvetted into our midst
at the taxpayers’ expense. But this is far from the only existential
ideological challenge we are facing. Cultural Marxism has been merged with
global financial fascism driven by the military-industrial complex and an international
investment banking system that are now deep in bed with the CCP. They have used
Big Pharma to sicken humanity in the name of vaccinating the planet against the
very artificial virus that they were responsible for creating in the Level 4
laboratory in Wuhan in cooperation with the Communist Chinese military.
Given these facts I can guarantee that the next "plan-demic”
and species of political insanity that these authoritarian actors will unleash upon
humanity will make COVID-19 look like a mere triviality or perhaps more accurately,
simply a dry run for what is to come next. Oligarchs who are endowed with great
power are also possessed by pathological narcissism. This cabal despite their
unlikely ties to one another are now manifesting Satanic influence over
humanity on a global scale. Demonic entities have coalesced into an all
controlling Marxofascist BLOB who are promoting endless unwinnable proxy wars.
Conflicts which can only be ended by restoring the Grand Narrative to the West,
namely that Christ alone is King, and that "collective salvation" is
a lie. Only individuals with free will are capable of choosing to accept
salvation by recognizing their own need of repentance and conversion. Due to the
West’s rejection of the Christian message God has permitted us to be reminded
that social collectivism of all kinds, whether it is Nazism, Fascism, Socialism,
Communism, WOKEism, Political Islamism, Postmodernism, and Cultural Marxism all
lead to the rejection of individual accountability and personal sovereignty that
replaces “I” with “we”. In a Christian society every single member of Christ’s
body must have freely chosen personal knowledge of Him for themselves. One
cannot be forced to convert for there is no coercion with God. He has made us
all sovereign and free to choose for ourselves.
Deuteronomy 30 (KJV)
Restoration Promised
1 And it shall come to pass, when all these things are
come upon thee, the blessing and the curse, which I have set before thee, and
thou shalt call them to mind among all the nations, whither the LORD thy God
hath driven thee,
2 And shalt return unto the LORD thy God, and shalt
obey his voice according to all that I command thee this day, thou and thy
children, with all thine heart, and with all thy soul; 3 That then the LORD thy
God will turn thy captivity, and have compassion upon thee, and will return and
gather thee from all the nations, whither the LORD thy God hath scattered thee.
4 If any of thine be driven out unto the outmost parts
of heaven, from thence will the LORD thy God gather thee, and from thence will
he fetch thee:
5 And the LORD thy God will bring thee into the land
which thy fathers possessed, and thou shalt possess it; and he will do thee
good, and multiply thee above thy fathers.
6 And the LORD thy God will circumcise thine heart,
and the heart of thy seed, to love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and
with all thy soul, that thou mayest live.
7 And the LORD thy God will put all these curses upon
thine enemies, and on them that hate thee, which persecuted thee.
8 And thou shalt return and obey the voice of the
LORD, and do all his commandments which I command thee this day.
9 And the LORD thy God will make thee plenteous in
every work of thine hand, in the fruit of thy body, and in the fruit of thy
cattle, and in the fruit of thy land, for good: for the LORD will again rejoice
over thee for good, as he rejoiced over thy fathers:
10 If thou shalt hearken unto the voice of the LORD
thy God, to keep his commandments and his statutes which are written in this
book of the law, and if thou turn unto the LORD thy God with all thine heart,
and with all thy soul.
The Choice of Life or Death
11 For this commandment which I command thee this day,
it is not hidden from thee, neither is it far off.
12 It is not in heaven, that thou shouldest say, Who
shall go up for us to heaven, and bring it unto us, that we may hear it, and do
it?
13 Neither is it beyond the sea, that thou shouldest
say, Who shall go over the sea for us, and bring it unto us, that we may hear
it, and do it?
14 But the word is very nigh unto thee, in thy mouth,
and in thy heart, that thou mayest do it.
15 See, I have set before thee this day life and good,
and death and evil;
16 In that I command thee this day to love the LORD
thy God, to walk in his ways, and to keep his commandments and his statutes and
his judgments, that thou mayest live and multiply: and the LORD thy God shall
bless thee in the land whither thou goest to possess it.
17 But if thine heart turn away, so that thou wilt not
hear, but shalt be drawn away, and worship other gods, and serve them;
18 I denounce unto you this day, that ye shall surely
perish, and that ye shall not prolong your days upon the land, whither thou
passest over Jordan to go to possess it.
19 I call heaven and earth to record this day against
you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore
choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live:
20 That thou mayest love the LORD thy God, and that
thou mayest obey his voice, and that thou mayest cleave unto him: for he is thy
life, and the length of thy days: that thou mayest dwell in the land which the
LORD sware unto thy fathers, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, to give them.
Permit me to quote Bertrand Russell, famed British
mathematician, logician, philosopher, and public intellectual who influenced
mathematics, logic, set theory, and analytic philosophy; “Most people would
rather die than think; in fact, they do so.” Until we can completely
deconstruct the prevailing Postmodern globalist narrative and its agenda which
has parasitized the minds of so many here in the West, an agenda which has come
to resemble a rapidly growing Gnostic mystery cult, the emergence of mass
formation psychosis cannot be avoided. From the rear cover of Dr. Gad Saad’s
brilliant work on idea pathogens, “The Parasitic Mind: How Infectious Ideas Are
Killing Common Sense” it reads, “There's a war against truth... and if we don't
win it, intellectual freedom will be a casualty.” In this book Dr. Saad lays
out the neuro-parasitological framework of the mind virus known as WOKE and how
it parasitizes the host to destroy itself out of suicidal empathy. The cover
goes on to state, “The West’s commitment to freedom, reason, and true
liberalism has never been more seriously threatened than it is today by the
stifling forces of political correctness”. Dr Saad asserted the following after
having an interaction with a graduate student in post-modernism, cultural
anthropology, and women's studies, which Dr. Saad refers to as the Holy Trinity
of bullshit. He believes that the one idea pathogen that is the granddaddy of
all of them is Postmodernism since it removes the ability of having human universals
which provide a universally agreed upon understanding of what words mean. If
there is no universal meaning, then everything becomes shackled by our personal
biases and by subjectivity. He went on to observe that though they assert that
there are no universal truths other than the one universal truth that there are
no universal truths, they miss this irony. Dr. Saad stated that he wakes up
every day as an academic knowing that there are regularities in the world to
study otherwise there'd be no point in being a scientist. If he didn’t have a
common place where he could agree with the graduate student in question that
only women can bear children, that there is such a thing as east and west, and
there is a star called the sun, if they could not agree on these as universal
truths, then this a form of intellectual terrorism. So where can studying postmodernism
take you? Well, it can take you to believing that boys too can menstruate, that
boys too can bear children precisely because there is no universal meaning anymore
that we can all agree upon. So, this is why he argues that Postmodernism is a
form of intellectual terrorism and it's the granddaddy of all idea pathogens.
Canada’s current Prime Minister is the posterchild for every
possible Postmodern deconstruction of reality which is why he had menstrual
products installed in the men’s washrooms in all of Ottawa’s federal government
facilities. Trudeau obviously believes the only universal truth is whatever the
latest lie he says that he feeds to the public through his publicly funded
media apparatus despite him repeatedly having found to be lying. His often-stated
belief in the culturally anthropological delusion of cultural relativism that bring
unvetted immigrants here from war torn countries enriches the nation because
all cultures have equal value except for our own Western culture which is hideous
and oppressive. This even though almost all of those who are on secret service
terrorist watch lists are radical political Islamists, you know the religion
that Trudeau himself describes as a religion of peace while labelling Christian
conservatives as horrid, bigoted extremists. This is why he stated, "The
very concept of a nation founded by European settlers is offensive to me. Old
Stock White Canadians are an unpleasant relic, and quite frankly, replaceable.
And we will replace them". And by claiming that trans-people are real
women too obviously does nothing to support the cause of feminism, not to mention
how he has treated senior female members of his government whom he dismissed
from caucus.
But that is here in Canada, but who precisely, is the source
for the global proselytizing of such stupid ideas that originated in the social
science departments of our universities since these ideas are leading to the
downfall of Western reason and values? Let us look at the WEF’s own website to discover
one of the primary sources but by no means the only source of evangelizing WOKE
Postmodern nonsense. The Global elite have weaponized these ideas as a means of
enabling greater wealth transfer from the common John and Jane into their filthy
lucre filled coffers: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/06/now-is-the-time-for-a-great-reset/
“COVID-19 lockdowns may be gradually easing, but anxiety
about the world’s social and economic prospects is only intensifying. There is
good reason to worry: a sharp economic downturn has already begun, and we could
be facing the worst depression since the 1930s. But, while this outcome is
likely, it is not unavoidable.
To achieve a better outcome, the world must act jointly and
swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to
social contracts and working conditions. Every country, from the United States
to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must
be transformed. In short, we need a “Great Reset” of capitalism.”
All forms of social collectivism are organized systems of
mass formation psychosis! This explains why to normal folk their beliefs,
practices, and behaviours seem so odd, reactionary, weird, and perverse.
Whenever confronted with reality the parasitized will invariably project their
own mental illness onto those who dare to point out that what they believe is
psychotic delusion. And since I'm now out of the closet, as it were, I want my
readers to know that I state these things as a proud confirmed male lesbian who
pees out of my “mangina”! And if you think my assertion is nuts (since it is)
look at the attached photo from the United Nations. A picture isn't merely
worth a thousand words, it redefines the very meaning of words and reality
itself. Unless these delusions are ended, the West is lost.
Postmodern historical revisionism is busily toxifying our past which is causing our children to feel shame about their own culture. It must be noted that Mao caused the death of some 50,000,000 Chinese while pursuing a similar agenda to toxify China's cultural past. We need to recognize that our institutions of education are under a Neo-Marxist assault that is being orchestrated by international bodies, quangos and NGO’s who admit to promoting a Neo-Marxist Postmodern agenda, namely the “Great Reset of Capitalism” which is bafflegab for Marx’s and Engles’ “Dialectical Materialism” from the Communist Manifesto. We ought to learn from our history, warts, blemishes, and beauty regardless since we cannot rewrite the past nor impose our morals onto our ancestors
Noted defender of Christian values and individual liberty
Father Calvin Robinson has been driven out of Britain to assume a pastorate in
West Michigan by a perverted political class that has succumbed to the
Postmodern madness of Cultural Marxist Critical Theory whose primary goal is to
attack our faith and our families while leaving our borders open to invasion
from war torn third world countries. Britian’s government not only refuses to enforce
the rule of law, but also imports violent crime and murder while making
political prisoners and refugees of Christian preachers. We are witnessing crowds
of those who hide their faces behind masks repeatedly breaking the law
pronouncing judgement upon the social injustices of others but are only doing
so to hide their own moral failures.
In Great Britain Starmer's reign of authoritarian tyranny is
providing proof that so-called Democratic Socialism is a lie. Socialism by its
very nature must rely on coercion and force. England, the very land of Magna
Carta and the idea of personal autonomy, has resubmitted to a reworked version
of feudalism under Starmer's stupid and vindictive premiership which now has
taken political prisoners, persecutes Christian pastors, even as it releases violent
criminals who ought never to have set foot on her shores to walk upon England's
mountains green where the Holy Lamb of God, on England’s pleasant pastures were
once seen through Christ's Church which has now utterly lost its way!
Until people realize that the Postmodern narrative is false,
we will never win the present ideological battle. What is being labelled as far
right and radical left are merely variants of similar collectivist ideologies
that demand that the individual must be subsumed into a faceless social
collective as represented by the state. Statism is therefore the enemy of
individual autonomy and the equality of all under the law. For there to be real
equality Lady Justice must be kept blind to race, creed, colour, personal
beliefs and sex.
“England may have been a commercial power with a cohesive
elite made up of nobles, the landed gentry, and wealthy merchants, but the
social cleavages and the resentment of the lower classes against the upper
classes were nearly as great as they were on the continent even if the details
vary. The contempt went both ways. For the most part, the upper classes cared
little for the lower classes, seeing them instead as creatures to exploit much
like their abused animals. Debauchery and drunkenness were common.
The Church of England did nothing to mitigate the
kingdom’s social problems. Since the Stuart Restoration (1660), Britain had
largely enforced conformity to the Church of England, suppressing Dissenters
including Puritans in England and Presbyterians in Scotland. Despite this,
religion was not a major theme in the period.
After the English Civil War and Commonwealth, British
elites looked on any serious commitment to religion or religious practices with
suspicion. You were expected to attend church on Sunday, have a church wedding,
baptize your children, and be buried in the churchyard, but that was about it.
Anything more than that was labeled “enthusiasm,” roughly the equivalent of
being called a “holy roller.”
The Evangelical Revival
That said, while polite society rejected anything beyond
going through the motions when it comes to faith, others especially in the
lower classes found something far more meaningful and profound in the
Evangelical Revival that swept Britain and many of its American colonies.
Interestingly, many of the leaders of these revivals were
precisely the kind of highly educated individuals who were drawn to the
Enlightenment. Jonathan Edwards, the most famous preacher of the Great
Awakening in New England, is considered by many today to be the greatest
thinker that America has produced. George Whitefield and John and Charles
Wesley were Oxford graduates.
Despite the number of intellectual elites who joined or
led the Evangelical Revival, however, it was far from an elitist movement. Some
of its leaders, while educated, were hardly part of the intellectual elite.
Howell Harris, one of the key leaders of the Welsh Revival, was a simple
schoolmaster. Further, unlike the Enlightenment, which appealed primarily to
elites, the revivals reached primarily common people, even people below the
level of literacy such as coal miners. The result was a spiritual revolution
that transformed British society.
As we face significant social upheaval and challenges in
our society, the question is, which model will we follow: a secular model built
on elitist theories of social reform, or a spiritual model based on a
recognition of sin and the need for repentance and inner transformation?
The Spiritual Revolution
According to many historians, the Evangelical Revival
helped prevent England from having its own bloody revolution on the model of
France. The message preached in these revivals emphasized not an easy
conversion experience, but repentance resulting in turning away from sin and a
transformed life. They thus looked for spiritual renewal rather than secular,
Enlightenment-driven social reform, and they did so in sufficient numbers to
keep Britain from collapsing in an orgy of violence.
This did not mean that they ignored social problems,
however. The need to root out sin in one’s life extended further to rooting it
out of society. Thus, British Evangelicals were involved in lobbying and
agitating for social reform in every area it was needed.
Most famously, this was personified in William
Wilberforce, the parliamentarian who led the fight against the slave trade but
who also was involved in nearly 70 other organizations dedicated to righting
the many wrongs in British society. In the end, he was largely successful—not
only was slavery abolished, but it was said of Wilberforce that he made
goodness fashionable in England.
As we face significant social upheaval and challenges in
our society, the question is, which model will we follow: a secular model built
on elitist theories of social reform, or a spiritual model based on a
recognition of sin and the need for repentance and inner transformation? Will
we use secular means to achieve our goals or the weapons of the Spirit—prayer,
love, and repentance? The results of each are before us. We need to choose
wisely. Future generations are depending on us.”
The puppet masters create "disorder" so the
people will demand "order". The price of "order" always
entails a handing over of control and loss of freedom on the part of the
citizenry. Out of "chaos" comes "order" - THEIR order -
their new WORLD order. The trick of creating chaos and then seizing power under
the pretense of putting things back in order is a tried and true method of
deception and manipulation. It's the meaning behind the Latin motto: ORDO AB
CHAO meaning ORDER OUT OF CHAOS.
This is BIG BROTHER’S CHAOS ORDER:
It's also referred to as the Hegelian Dialectic after
the philosopher Georg Hegel who described it as: THESIS -- ANTITHESIS --
SYNTHESIS. Others have described this as: PROBLEM -- REACTION – SOLUTION in
that firstly you create the problem; then secondly you fan the flames to get a
reaction; then thirdly (like Johnny-on-the-spot) you provide a solution. The
solution is what you were wanting to achieve in the first place, but wouldn't
have been able to achieve under normal circumstances. Otherwise, this is known
as the “new Normal”, Orwell described this as REALITY CONTROL. ~ Jackie Jura
Radical social collectivists only understand consolidating
authoritarian centralized power. The only concept which determines what is
moral to them is whatever weaponized means of control they can use to further
centralize their power while undermining the rights of the individual. They
live by the motto that their real action lies in their opponents’ reaction to
their policies, yet invariably we have taken the bait. This is literally how
they define their revolutionary struggle for dominance. It is Hegelian to its
core. They go from the thesis of creating a policy that causes a reaction, to
antithesis where we react negatively to the new policy, to synthesis where
their action and our reaction create the "new normal" and so on. Each
reiteration of this process serves to further their Cultural Marxist
Revolution! Our ONLY hope lies in helping others to understand how this process
works. Once people know how it operates, they'll stop playing whack--a-mole
with the Devil.
Which is why people must be educated to understand how
ideological possession occurs. Truly parasitic ideas have escaped the humanity
departments of universities to infect society. These idea pathogens are causing
the West to commit suicide by parasitical empathy. When we come to care more
for "others" than we do for our own this is proof of said
parasitization. Note that it is women who most easily fall prey since the
parasite uses emotions to destroy the host. Women's emotional systems are being
hijacked since they are more vulnerable to being controlled by empathy. They
are therefore the chief target of this idea pathogen. This is why they replaced
Biden with Harris who is all about feelings.
This has resulted in England, which is the very home of the
mother of all parliaments, to commit cultural suicide due to toxic sympathy for
violent foreign elements who do not share Christian British values. London is
to the Anglosphere what Rome was to its empire, for without the centre the
outliers cannot survive. Britain, America, Canada and Western Europe, among
other Western regions and nations, are committing suicide by parasitical
empathy. Their governing class and the intellectual elite care more for Islam
and radical Cultural Marxist Critical Theory, replete as it is with a complete
ignorance of a sound economic policies capable of raising the most marginalized
out of poverty than they do about upholding the Christian values of the West.
As a result, the West has placed itself under a curse that only repentance can cure.
But God Himself has closed the eyes and ears of those governing us lest they
repent, turn to Christ, and be healed!
There is an old Norse saying which loosely translated goes,
"A witless man believes everything he knows between the two mountains
where he lives." But there's a greater evil, that of the well travelled
person who believes they understand more than what they do for despite their
experiences they view the world through the lens of their own flawed ideological
perspective. And then even a greater evil still where the naive and witless
valley dweller comes to look up to the so-called educated enlightened traveller
for, they in turn will come to share similar delusions. This describes our
present dilemma. And it alludes to the reason of our prevailing cultural crisis.
It is a manifestation of the Dunning–Kruger effect where ideologically possessed
people with limited cognitive competence who are devoid of enlightenment will
overestimate their abilities and understanding of the real issues confronting
humanity. This phenomenon was first described by Justin Kruger and David
Dunning in 1999. Mass media propaganda based on these cognitive biases have further
served to create our present mass societal delusion.
For over a decade I've been warning about the fact that our
schools and universities have been weaponized against the interests of society
using huge amounts of our tax dollars that could be better spent on programs
that are actually vital rather than promoting parasitical ideas which are
further infecting society. This is obscene, unnatural, perverted and diabolical
to its Cultural Marxist ideological core, specifically because it targets our
children! No one voted for this idea-babble nor did our politicians advertise
that this was part of their political agenda!
If you are wondering why it is that you and those whom you
know are suffering from increased generalized anxiety, now you know. Terrible
ideas that were hatched by university professors in the humanities departments
of our universities have escaped to deconstruct civil order. Performative
caring is on full display. Our elected representatives have misgoverned us into
a crisis due to pursuing policies which are the diametric opposite of actual progress.
They don't mean a word of what they claim as they throw billions of our tax
dollars on an idiotic radical agenda that is culturally and spiritually ruinous!
It is for this reason that I state that the Cultural Marxist Revolution is
practically complete. We live in a society which is committing suicide by
parasitical empathy where feelings have replaced reason even as we dare to sit
in moral judgment of our ancestors whose accomplishments were so grand compared
to that of our own that our greatest accolade must be our ability to whine
about how morally superior we are even as we live in the ashes of the
civilization that our forebears created which we have now become hellbent on
destroying.
Galatians 5:1 King James Bible
Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath
made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.
History repeats itself: the Gnostic cult of postmodern
thinking
Today the west is being confronted with a Postmodern heresy
closely related to the one the early Church fathers countered in their time. So,
permit be to begin by discussing how Gnosticism posed an inherent threat to the
early Church whose task it became was to counter false doctrines. This is
essential for Christianity today since we are facing a similar crisis with Gnostic
Postmodern WOKE ideologies. The reasons define how Gnosticism posed a
significant threat to the early Christian Church:
Theological Differences: Gnosticism introduced
beliefs that were fundamentally different from orthodox Christian teachings.
Gnostics believed in a dualistic universe where the material world was created
by a lesser, malevolent deity, and salvation was achieved through secret knowledge
(gnosis). This contrasted sharply with the Christian belief in a single,
benevolent God and salvation through faith in Jesus Christ.
Scriptural Interpretations: Gnostics often had their
own interpretations of Christian scriptures or even their own texts, such as
the Gospel of Thomas. These interpretations and texts sometimes contradicted
the canonical gospels and teachings of the early church, leading to confusion
and division among believers.
Authority and Unity: The early church was working to
establish a unified doctrine and authority structure. Gnosticism, with its
diverse and often secretive teachings, undermined this effort by promoting
alternative leaders and doctrines. This threatened the unity and cohesion of
the early Christian community.
Ethical Implications: Some Gnostic teachings led to
ethical practices that were at odds with those of the early church. For
example, some Gnostics believed that since the material world was evil, moral
behavior in the physical realm was irrelevant. This could lead to either extreme
asceticism or moral laxity, both of which were problematic for the early
church’s emphasis on righteous living.
Overall, Gnosticism challenged the early church’s efforts to
define and defend its core beliefs, maintain unity, and establish a consistent
ethical framework. The church responded by condemning Gnostic teachings as
heretical and working to clarify and codify orthodox Christian doctrine.
So, in today’s blog and vodcast I will attempt to
demonstrate why the current attack on our cultural values is due to the Gnosticism
inherent to authoritarianism in all its various socially collectivist forms.
These manifestations of illiberalism are in fact expressions of gnostic mystery
religions where only its priests can truly understand its hidden mysteries. This
obviously seems to fly in the face of the fact that they deny the existence of
God but only because we fail to recognize that its priests have made themselves
into gods. This is why when we have heard them speak or read what they have
written one is forced to wonder why their rhetoric often sounds like
gobbledygook.
A musician friend of mine sent me an article written in one
of the 4th Estate's most notable Neo-Marxist rags that promoted an
end to the use of coal as an energy source and asked Trudeau to interfere with
shipping it abroad. I told my friend that I literally never read the TO Star. I
have no use for the 4th Estate which has become the disinformation
arm of a government (taxpayer) funded cultural revolution. I said to him,
"I do not think you are fully aware of how completely I have rejected the
accepted Postmodern narrative." In the first grade when they made us sing,
I am a little teapot short and stout I balked at it. I knew I was short but
certainly not stout. Moreover, I knew I was not a teapot and was horrified at
how the entire class, most emphatically the girls, went along with its idiotic
gestures of the hip hold, extended arm, and tipping whilst singing its moronic
ever so uncool white ungroovy lyrics. I do not do things in unison with others.
I cannot march in lockstep with the current mandated thing. We now live in a
society which blindly follows leaders who are marching us straight into a
cultural abattoir. And for the fools who do not want coal to be used, the
solution to using it cleanly is to install scrubbers in the chimneys of the
plants who burn it. It is impossible to turn matter into energy without
creating byproducts. I guess you idiots who danced the teapot passed that
course with flying colours but flunked high school physics.
Why there is broad acceptance of the Postmodern narrative
despite it sounding like nonsense:
For at least 60 years dialectics have crept their way into
the prevailing Postmodern narrative. In rejecting God its creators have founded
a new Hegelian mystery religion where only its priests can see behind the
curtain of Gnostic knowledge. Which is why to the uninitiated it appears to be
based upon madness. Believe it or not this explains the reason for the
deliberate outcome of what the Postmodern priests label as progress being
madness since we lack the secret knowledge to understand what progress means.
Every single totalitarian ideology has been built on
Hegelian Dialectical thinking. Its influence on the Postmodern narrative is
among the best documented phenomena of our time! It borrows from the Platonic
idea of the Demiurge. The concept of the Demiurge, as originally presented by
Plato and later adapted by various philosophical and religious traditions has not
been explicitly adopted by totalitarian regimes but its concepts have been
borrowed and altered to suit their purposes. The Demiurge is primarily a
metaphysical and cosmological figure, and its interpretations have largely
remained within the realms of philosophy, theology, and esoteric traditions¹².
However, totalitarian ideologies have drawn on various
philosophical and religious concepts to justify their worldviews and actions.
For example, certain Gnostic interpretations of the Demiurge depict it as a
malevolent or ignorant creator, responsible for the flawed material world². This
is the essence of both Nazism’s and Communism’s world view that it is up to
them to change the nature of reality itself because they cannot accept the
world as it is. This idea of a corrupt or oppressive creator could be metaphorically
linked to the way totalitarian regimes view themselves as the ultimate
authority, shaping and controlling society according to their own ideals.
Totalitarian ideologies often draw on various
philosophical and religious concepts to justify their control over society.
While the concept of the Demiurge itself hasn't been directly adopted by
totalitarian regimes, its underlying themes can be seen in how these ideologies
operate.
1. **Control and Order**: The Demiurge in Gnostic
traditions is often seen as a controlling force, shaping the material world.
Similarly, totalitarian regimes seek to control all aspects of life, imposing
strict order and suppressing dissent¹².
2. **Creation of a New Reality**: Just as the
Demiurge is seen as creating the physical world, totalitarian regimes often aim
to create a new social and political reality. They use propaganda, censorship,
and education to shape the beliefs and behaviors of their citizens¹².
3. **Utopian Ideals**: Totalitarian ideologies often
promise a utopian future, much like the Demiurge's creation of an ordered
cosmos from chaos. This promise is used to justify extreme measures and the
suppression of individual freedoms¹².
4. **Centralized Authority**: The Demiurge is a
central, authoritative figure in the creation myth. Totalitarian regimes
similarly centralize power in a single leader or party, demanding absolute
loyalty and obedience¹².
These parallels show how totalitarian ideologies can adopt
and adapt philosophical concepts to support their goals.
While totalitarian ideologies don't explicitly reference
the demiurge, they often adopt a role that mirrors its attributes, especially
within the Gnostic framework. Here's how:
Perception of a Flawed World: Totalitarian regimes
typically view the existing social, political, and economic order as
fundamentally flawed, corrupt, or oppressive. This perspective aligns with the
Gnostic view of the material world being inherently defective due to the
demiurge's influence.
Promise of Radical Transformation: To address these
perceived flaws, totalitarian movements propose a comprehensive reorganization
of society. They aim to craft a new world order based on their ideological
principles, essentially acting as creators or architects of a redesigned
reality. This ambition parallels the demiurge's role as the shaper of the
material world.
Claim to Exclusive Knowledge: Scholars like Eric
Voegelin have described modern totalitarian movements as exhibiting
"gnostic" characteristics. These ideologies often claim to possess
exclusive insights or knowledge (gnosis) about the path to a perfected society.
This self-ascribed authority justifies their sweeping reforms and the
suppression of dissenting views.
Immanentizing the Eschaton: Totalitarian regimes
attempt to realize an ultimate, often utopian, state of society within the
temporal world—a concept Voegelin termed "immanentizing the
eschaton." This endeavor reflects the demiurge's act of bringing form and
order to existence, albeit through a flawed lens.
In essence, while totalitarian ideologies don't directly
adopt the idea of the demiurge, they embody its thematic elements by
positioning themselves as the sole architects capable of redeeming a flawed
world. This alignment serves both to legitimize their authority and to mobilize
support for their transformative agendas.
The high priests of the Global Cabal:
For the first time in human history global illiberal and
authoritarian interests have coalesced into an all powerful and controlling
system where NGOs and quangos are dictating to sovereign nations how their
citizens must be governed. These entities are responsible for the mishandling
of COVID-19 and the lies we were told about the toxic failed inoculant that was
created in concert with the virus which resulted in untold injuries to those
who have received it. These same NGOs and quangos all use variations of
Cultural Marxist Critical Theory to further a cultural revolution which starts
with redefining the nature of the nuclear family. Their agenda has successfully
broken down the very structures of and foundations for civil society which is
why we are currently experiencing such unprecedented levels of civil unrest due
to them pursuing a Neo-Marxist utopia which cannot exist.
Multiculturalism is therefore an impossibility since it
denies the very nature of the social glue that makes culture itself possible,
namely shared ethical values, cultural traditions, and common religious
beliefs. The West cannot exist as a project that defends human dignity and
freedom without its Christian foundations. Which is why Christianity exists in
direct opposition to the goals of these organizations which are creations of
the UN.
The UN instead of being a vehicle for international peace
and cooperation has become the means for furthering Neo-Marxism.
"Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) serve as
critical players in the modern societal framework, often filling gaps that
government bodies and private sectors are unable to address effectively. The
role of an NGO in society encompasses a wide range of activities that
contribute to social change, community development, and the promotion of civic
engagement. In this article, we will explore the multifaceted functions that
NGOs perform and how to find NGOs in your area.
What is an NGO?
Non-governmental organizations, or NGOs, were first
called such in Article 71 in the Charter of the newly formed United Nations in
1945. While NGOs have no fixed or formal definition, they are generally defined
as nonprofit entities independent of governmental influence (although they may
receive government funding).
As one can tell from the basic definition above, the
difference between nonprofit organizations (NPOs) and NGOs is slim. However,
the term "NGO" is not typically applied to U.S.-based nonprofit
organizations. Generally, the NGO label is given to organizations operating on
an international level although some countries classify their own civil society
groups as NGOs.
One of the primary roles of an NGO is to act as an
advocate for social change. NGOs often work towards influencing policies and
legislation that affect the communities they serve. By engaging in advocacy
work, NGOs raise awareness on critical issues such as human rights,
environmental protection, and social justice, striving to bring about systemic
change that can improve the lives of people on a larger scale.
Grassroots mobilization
NGOs play a crucial role in mobilizing communities at the
grassroots level. They empower individuals by providing them with the knowledge
and tools necessary to advocate for their rights and interests. This bottom-up
approach ensures that the voices of the marginalized and underrepresented are
heard, fostering a society that values inclusivity and diversity.
Humanitarian assistance
In times of crisis, such as natural disasters or
conflicts, NGOs are often among the first to respond with humanitarian
assistance. They provide essential services including food, shelter, medical
care, and psychological support to those affected. NGOs' flexibility and
ability to act quickly often make them more efficient than larger, more
bureaucratic institutions in delivering aid to those in need.
Community development and empowerment
NGOs are instrumental in community development projects
that aim to improve the quality of life for individuals and groups. These
projects may include building schools, improving healthcare facilities, and
providing vocational training to enhance employment opportunities. By focusing
on empowerment, NGOs help communities to become self-reliant and sustainable in
the long term.
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
NGOs contribute significantly to the achievement of the
United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). These 17 goals aim to
address global challenges such as poverty, inequality, climate change, and
peace. NGOs often tailor their projects and initiatives to align with one or
more of these goals, thereby contributing to a global effort towards
sustainable development.
Education and capacity building
Education is a cornerstone of NGO activities. Many
organizations focus on providing educational opportunities to children and
adults alike, helping to reduce illiteracy rates and equipping individuals with
the skills needed to participate fully in society. Through capacity-building
workshops, NGOs also strengthen the abilities of other civil society
organizations, enhancing their impact and efficiency.
How can I find an NGO in my area?
Navigating the vast landscape of
non-governmental organizations (NGOs) can be a daunting task. Enter Candid, the
world's largest source of comprehensive information on NGOs. Whether you're a
philanthropist, a researcher, or simply interested in the nonprofit sector,
Candid is your first stop to accessing NGO's in your area.”
My summation:
The hive mind shared by these organizations represents a set
of orthodoxies that demand compliance to their doctrines under pain of being
labelled a heretic. These bodies have placed every legislative assembly
throughout the developed west under their direct influence and woe betide any
sovereign nation who dare to govern itself under its own laws, particularly if
those laws are founded on Christian ethics and Biblical morality. The very
reason that the average person cannot comprehend their agenda is that its Gnostic
secrets are known only to its high priests. Those who long to share is such
mysteries are only permitted to enter behind the veil by means of blind obedience.
To the sane mind this enigma is hidden in cognitive dissonance if one were to
attempt to accept the mutually exclusive nonsense of Hegelian anti-reason of
thesis then antithesis onto synthesis. Here is how it works. Thesis, two plus
two equals four. Antithesis, two plus two equals five. Synthesis, two plus two
equals four and/or five depending on the whims of the high priests. This is how
willing the priests of the gnostic cult have become to accept something which
the average person simply cannot grasp. And this universalism has replaced
Christianity. You may think that is a good thing, but you would be a fool if
you do since every single authoritarian regime was based upon gnostic mysticism
and Hegelian thinking.
The early church took several measures to counter the
threat of Gnosticism and other false ideologies:
1. **Establishing Canonical Scriptures**: The church
worked to establish a canon of authoritative scriptures. By recognizing certain
texts as inspired and authoritative, the church provided a clear standard for
doctrine and practice. This helped to counter the diverse and often
contradictory texts promoted by Gnostic groups.
2. **Creeds and Confessions**: The early church
formulated creeds and confessions of faith, such as the Apostles' Creed and the
Nicene Creed. These concise statements of core Christian beliefs helped to
unify the church around a common set of doctrines and provided a clear standard
against which to measure other teachings.
3. **Church Councils**: The church convened councils,
such as the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD, to address theological disputes and
heresies. These councils brought together bishops and other church leaders to
discuss and resolve issues, leading to the formal condemnation of Gnostic
teachings and the affirmation of orthodox Christian doctrine.
4. **Apologetics and Theological Writings**: Early
Christian apologists and theologians, such as Irenaeus, Tertullian, and Origen,
wrote extensively to refute Gnostic teachings and defend + Christianity. Their
writings provided intellectual and theological arguments against Gnosticism and
helped to educate and strengthen the faith of believers.
5. **Pastoral Care and Discipleship**: Church leaders
emphasized pastoral care and discipleship to ensure that believers were
well-grounded in their faith. By teaching sound doctrine and providing
spiritual guidance, pastors and bishops helped to protect their congregations
from the influence of false teachings.
Through these efforts, the early church was able to counter
the threat of Gnosticism and other false ideologies, maintaining the integrity
and unity of the Christian faith. If we are to have any hope at all of
restoring Godly order and the freedom which is to be found in Christ alone, we
must do the same! This is a call to action to all who share my hope in a living
and resurrected Saviour for without Christ as King of every earthly government
we are doomed to live in oppressive murderous tyranny despite all the idiotic
utopian promises of the Gnostic fools who are busily deconstructing what has taken
two millennia to build.
Let me begin with the following admonitions which ought to
set up todays vodcast nicely. It will also serve to sort the wheat fro the
chaff as it were since many of you will listen no further!
Psalm 14:1 “The fool hath said in his heart, There is no
God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that
doeth good.”
Deuteronomy 32:18 - “You neglected the Rock who begot
you, And forgot the God who gave you birth.”
Jeremiah 6:10 - “To whom shall I speak and give warning
That they may hear? Behold, their ears are closed And they cannot listen.
Behold, the word of the Lord has become a reproach to them; They have no
delight in it.”
My thoughts on the abattoir in Southport and the radical
Marxist agenda that made it possible:
Regarding the brutal Satanic butchering of three innocent children
by Axel Muganwa Rudakubana where three children were hacked to death, two of
them, aged six and seven years, died on Monday, the third, a girl aged nine
years, died Tuesday morning as a result of injuries sustained during the knife
attack, Merseyside Police said in a statement. Eight other children were
injured, five of them critically. Two adults were also injured while trying to
protect the children and are also in critical condition, according to the
police. This tragic incident in Southport which involved girls who were
attending a Taylor Swift-themed dance class at The Hart Space community centre.
The heinous slaughter of Bebe King, Elsie Dot Stancombe, and Alice Dasilva
Aguiar provides further proof that unchecked immigration from war torn
countries is the actual issue we are facing in the West. And behind these
immigration policies lies a Neo-Marxist agenda known as Critical Race Theory. Any
thinking person is forced to conclude what I have been stating for well over a
decade is factual, that murderous medieval cultures are completely at odds with
Western Christian values.
So obviously the question remains as to what motivated what
became an abattoir in a dance class? My answer is that it matters little, punishment
and law enforcement however do matter. And the outrage of the British people
matters! We are witnessing an opprobrium which is boiling over into the streets
even as Starmer’s Stasi proclaim that the “far right” is the real problem.
Axel Muganwa Rudakubana was named as the murderer on Monday.
He was raised by Rwandans who came to Britain in the nineties. The specific
circumstances of why they came are still unknown to the public, but it is
connected to the 1994 Rwandan genocide, in which somewhere between 600,000 and
800,000 Tutsis were slaughtered in 100 days of unimaginable savagery, much of
it committed with machetes and other cutting weapons. Many people,
understandably, asked if the killer was a convert to radical Islam; after all,
the nature of the murders had all the hallmarks of an Islamic terror attack.
That seems less likely now, especially as Rwanda is majority Christian, and
Rudakubana is not a Muslim name. But here’s another theory, was he radicalised,
or inspired if you prefer, by stories of what happened in Rwanda?
Now as to Critical Race Theory and its affect on civil
society
Critical Race Theory has led Great Britian and many other
Western countries into a two-tiered system of law enforcement where if you’re
are considered by the authorities as a member of the under-class you will be
given preferential treatment under the law. Cultural Marxist Critical Race
Theory is leading to the death and murder of innocents and the nation raging in
opposition to an ideology which has divided society into an us versus them mentality.
Despite the authorities mischaracterizing the protestors, the majority of folks
at the London protest of July 31st were not in any way violent
rather its leaders’ shouted Christ is King while calling for solidarity and
calm. You should not be feeling unsafe in our motherland was the theme promoted
by the protest’s leaders. I assure you when people declare in unison that
Christ is King in opposition to their corrupt Neo-Marxist leaders who have
perverted Britain into an aberration of its Christian heritage while promoting
CRT then God Himself will move heaven and earth to stop their Cultural Marxist
march through our sacred institutions! Watch for yourselves live footage from
the protest to see the police acting as enforcers of the state’s radical agenda:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0X4uPjcEsE
As to the
origin of Critical Race Theory (CRT). CRT is an interdisciplinary academic
field that originated in the mid-1970s. It was developed by several American
legal scholars, including Derrick Bell, Alan Freeman, and Kimberlé Crenshaw,
among others¹². CRT examines the ways in which race and racism intersect with
other forms of social stratification, such as class, gender, and disability¹.
The
theory emerged as a response to what its founders saw as the limitations of the
civil rights movement and traditional legal approaches to addressing racial
inequalities¹². It draws from critical theory and critical legal studies, and
it challenges the idea that the law is neutral and objective¹².
The entire point of these social engineers is that the Cultural
Marxist social revolution is never ending. Its entire purpose is to be an ongoing
process of self deprecation which actually never intends to achieve its ends since
social revolution is their goal.
Critical Race Theory (CRT) and critical multiculturalism
are often promoted together because they share common goals and principles.
Both frameworks aim to address and dismantle systemic inequities and biases in
society, particularly those related to race, class, and gender.
**Critical Race Theory** focuses on understanding and
challenging the ways in which race and racism intersect with other forms of
social stratification to create and maintain inequality¹. It emphasizes that
racism is not just an individual bias but is embedded in legal systems,
policies, and institutions.
**Critical Multiculturalism**, on the other hand, seeks
to highlight and address structural inequities across various dimensions,
including race, class, and gender, to promote a more equitable distribution of
power and resources³. It goes beyond celebrating cultural diversity to
critically examine and challenge the power dynamics that marginalize certain
groups.
The promotion of both CRT and critical multiculturalism
by the same advocates is often due to their shared commitment to social justice
and equity. By integrating these frameworks, educators, policymakers, and
activists aim to create more inclusive and equitable environments in schools,
workplaces, and communities²³.
“In October 2010 Angela Merkel, leader of Europe’s most
powerful country, made a ringing declaration: “The multicultural concept is a
failure, an absolute failure.” Four months later, Britain’s then prime
minister, David Cameron, endorsed her approach, calling for “a lot less of the
passive tolerance of recent years and much more active, muscular liberalism”.
Within days France’s then president, Nicolas Sarkozy, had joined the chorus,
suggesting on television that “we’ve been too concerned about the identity of
new arrivals and not enough about the identity of the country receiving them”.
This last intervention, as historian Rita Chin points out in her lucid and
erudite overview of the debate, was somewhat surprising, given that “over many
decades France had explicitly refused to consider multiculturalism as a guiding
principle”.
While referring to Islamist terrorist atrocities in
Paris, Brussels and Berlin, Chin’s The Crisis of Multiculturalism in Europe
went to press too soon to note that during the election campaign that won him
the presidency this year, France’s Emmanuel Macron enraged his rightwing
critics by apologising for the “crime” of colonialism in Algeria, indicating
that his government would seek to “help with Muslim integration”.
“Integration”, of course, may run contrary to the
multicultural idea. The Nationality Commission set up by Jacques Chirac as
French prime minister in 1987 sought the “national integration” of Algerian and
other non-European incomers according to a historical pattern by which regional
minorities such as Bretons, Corsicans or Occitans were transformed into modern
citizens sharing common characteristics — as historian Eugen Weber famously put
it, turning “peasants into Frenchmen”.
Central to this is the idea of laïcité, a word usually
translated as “secularism” but with stronger ideological connotations. As Chin
notes, the French term conveys an ideal of church-state separation designed not
so much to ensure the protection of an individual’s religious beliefs (as in
the US) but to secure their “full allegiance to the state by counter-acting
religious prejudice”. Full allegiance demands a ban on “ostentatious” symbols
of religious affiliation such as large crosses, kippahs and, above all, the
“Muslim” headscarf.
In her survey of the complex and sometimes bizarre
arguments surrounding the question of the foulard, as banned for girls in state
schools, Chin shows how French commentators on both right and left tend to view
the headscarf as a symbol of patriarchal oppression, while ignoring the
possibility that for some wearers, at least, it may be a demonstration of
self-empowerment.
In contrast to France, both Britain and Germany adopted
positive approaches to multiculturalism — a trend that now appears to be in
retreat. Given their legal status as Commonwealth subjects, most of the
ex-colonials who arrived in the UK after the second world war were formally
entitled to the same rights as others, a factor that Chin suggests made
“immigrants in Britain somewhat bolder in their critiques and more efficacious
in their demands” than their French and German counterparts, enabling them to
take a more “active role in shaping the way diversity was managed”.
A turning point came with the Rushdie affair in the
1990s. The protests against The Satanic Verses — the novel in which Salman
Rushdie was accused of lampooning the Prophet Mohammed — “dramatically
transformed” immigration politics in Britain, shifting the focus of calls for
greater integration from Afro-Caribbeans to Asian Muslims, who were “suspected
of introducing religious fundamentalism and violence into a tolerant liberal
polity”. Chin suggests that by re-casting the debate on immigration in terms of
“liberal values”, British commentators subtly placed Rushdie’s immigrant
critics outside the bounds of the British cultural consensus.
Initially West Germany’s approach was different, with the
guest-worker programme regarded as a win-win means of building the postwar
economy while shedding the Nazi legacy. However, the new conception of
“culture” by which ministers could laud “the rapprochement between persons of
highly diverse backgrounds and cultures” betrayed “an underlying sense of
essential, unchanging difference”. Viewed in this light, the multicultural
mantra was a clever way of hiding the ethnically determined basis of German identity.
But is multiculturalism really dead, or are rumours of
its demise premature? Chin’s account of non-occidental immigration to leading
western European countries since the second world war (focusing primarily on
Britain, France and Germany, with sideways glances at Switzerland and the
Netherlands) does a good job by setting out the terms in which the debate has
been conducted. Her conclusion is sensible, if nuanced: “What a historical
perspective makes clear is that we need to uphold both liberal conceptions of
individual freedom and pluralistic communitarianism”, with each acting as a
check on the other.”
Here we can clearly see that the authorities understood CRT
and its Multiculturalist agenda were not working yet since these policies weren’t
working and conflicted with their Cultural Marxist agenda the going cultural Marxist
Revolution had to trump the obvious and blatant failures of CRT and Multiculturalism.
Keir Starmer has simply further radicalized this process in Britain. He is
committed to pursuing a murderous Neo-Marxist agenda which can only result in
further violence from immigrant communities which has created a potential powder
keg of explosive counter-revolution from the British people whom he labels as “far-right”
for wanting to live under a Rule of Law which applies equally to all.
So, what does Keir Starmer actually want? The UK’s new
Labour prime minister is usually described as moderate, pragmatic and
non-ideological. Here, historian and broadcaster David Starkey argues that this
is an illusion. Starmer, Starkey explains, is a fierce anti-democrat. He wants
to transfer power from the UK’s elected parliament to unelected bodies, from
the courts to the civil service to the quangos. His party will establish the
supremacy of the ‘Blob’, all while cracking down hard on free speech. Our democracy
and liberty are in peril. Watch, share and be sure to subscribe to our YouTube
channel. Listen to Dr. Starkey’s assessment at this link: https://youtu.be/srz2JRNxVg0?si=irfuvegIPpViv5Xb
My final thoughts:
Secularism cannot replace Christianity. Every single
principle of individual dignity and liberty flows from our faith in Christ. We
will witness the fulfillment of Jeremiah 8:9 where wise men will be put to
shame, dismayed and caught, since they have rejected the word of the Lord! For what
kind of wisdom do they have when their wisdom has resulted in the slaughter of
innocents? Christ is indeed King. Let us loudly declare it for then and only
then will we see limited constitutional government under the Rule of Law restored.
My thoughts on the use of pseudo religious iconography at
the Paris Olympic Games.
There are several scriptures in the Bible that refer to not
creating images for worship. Here are a few key ones:
Leviticus 26:1: This verse states, "You must not make
idols for yourselves or set up a carved image or sacred pillar; you must not
place a sculpted stone in your land to bow down to it. For I am the LORD your
God."
Exodus 20:2-6: This passage includes the commandment,
"You shall not make for yourself an image in the form of anything in
heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below."
Deuteronomy 5:8: This verse says, "You shall not make
for yourself an idol in the form of anything in the heavens above, on the earth
below, or in the waters beneath."
Deuteronomy 4:15-19: This passage warns the Israelites that
since they did not see any form on the day God spoke to them at Horeb out of
the midst of the fire, they should be careful not to act corruptly by making an
image for themselves in the form of any figure.
Isaiah 42:8: This verse states, “I am the LORD; that is my
name! I will not yield my glory to another or my praise to idols.”
Acts 17:29: In this verse, Apostle Paul says, “Therefore,
since we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Divine Nature
is like gold or silver or stone, something shaped by art and man’s devising.”
1 John 5:21: The apostle John concludes his first epistle
with this admonition, “Little children, keep yourselves from idols.”
These scriptures, among others, emphasize the prohibition
against creating images for worship. Exodus 20:4-6 states, "You must not
make for yourself an idol of any kind or an image of anything in the heavens or
on the earth or in the sea. You must not bow down to them or worship them, for
I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God who will not tolerate your affection for
any other gods."
Therefore, regarding the recreation of de Vinci’s Last
Supper at the Paris Olympics where a grossly unhealthy overweight woman of perverse
sexual orientation portrayed the de Vinci’s Christ figure. The painting the Last
Supper was created by **Leonardo da Vinci** which was commissioned by
**Ludovico Sforza**, who was the Duke of Milan, for the refectory (dining hall)
of the Convent of Santa Maria delle Grazie in Milan, Italy. The painting was
completed between 1495 and 1498. It's one of the most recognized and admired
works of art in the world.
Therefore, out of an attempt to be blasphemous while
insulting Christianity the Olympic display of bad taste actually raises quite another
critical aspect of Christian theology, namely why had the reformers from whom I
am descended reject the use of icons and images in worship? The Reformed
Christians, or Protestants, became iconoclasts (those who reject religious
images) during the Protestant Reformation in the 16th century³. This was
largely due to their interpretation of the Bible, particularly the Second
Commandment which states, "Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image,
or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth
beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow down
thyself to them, nor serve them" (Exodus 20:4-5)².
The Reformation was, in many ways, a revolt against what was
perceived as the excesses and corruptions of the Catholic Church, including the
use of images in worship³. The Reformers argued that the use of images in
Christian worship was contrary to the word of the Bible². They believed that
images limited God and wrapped God up in human ritual and convention⁴.
Moreover, by the late Middle Ages, the cult of saints had
assumed forms which came very close to idolatry. Sculptures of saints were
worshipped like gods and people prayed to them for help with specific
difficulties in their lives². The Reformers saw this practice as conflicting
with the Second Commandment and the principle of monotheism².
It's important to note that not all Reformed Christians were
iconoclasts. Martin Luther, for example, rejected the cult of saints but did
not see pictures and statues as dangerous in themselves². The degree of
iconoclasm varied among different Protestant denominations and continues to do
so today.
Source: Conversation with Copilot, 2024-07-30
(1) A Short Guide to Iconoclasm in Early History - JSTOR
Daily. https://daily.jstor.org/short-guide-iconoclasm-early-history/.
Luther never truly rejected all his Roman Catholic sensibilities.
His version of reformation was merely a stop gap measure which dealt only in
part with the issue of iconography and the commercialising of the Gospel of
Christ as big business where no one could buy or sell without the mark of the
beast, namely the stamp of Papal approval. So, I thought I ought to weigh in
regarding the freak show at the Paris Olympics and their attempt at a blasphemous
portrayal of Christ as a fat bloated tattooed muff diver. When precisely have
the French not adored perversion while persecuting the true Christian faith?
The French Wars of Religion were a series of civil wars
between French Catholics and Protestants (called Huguenots) from 1562 to 1598.
Between two and four million Huguenots died from violence, famine or disease
directly caused by the conflict, and it severely damaged the power of the
French monarchy.[1] One of its most notorious episodes was the St.
Bartholomew's Day massacre in 1572. The fighting ended with a compromise in
1598, when Henry of Navarre, who had converted to Catholicism in 1593, was
proclaimed King Henry IV of France and issued the Edict of Nantes, which
granted substantial rights and freedoms to the Huguenots. However, Catholics
continued to disapprove of Protestants and of Henry, and his assassination in
1610 triggered a fresh round of Huguenot rebellions in the 1620s.
The Saint Bartholomew's Day Massacre alone saw the streets
of Paris run with blood as with water when as many as 30,000 of the faithful
were murdered in cold blood by rabid French Catholics who obviously hated true
religion and by doing so persecuted Christ.
It is moments like the freak show in Paris that makes me
regret Canada and her allies shed blood to free the French from tyranny when
they return to it like a pig goes back to its slop trough!
From my previous blog entitled “Metanarratives, false
doctrines, and the true Church” published on June 6th 2024
In the wake of the Paris Olympics, I have heard evangelicals
speculating on the coming of the antichrist and the beast foretold in the Book
of Revelation forgetting how every single one of the protestant reformers knew
that the office of the Pope had fulfilled this prophecy. So let us examine how
the false doctrine of pretribulation rapture theory entered the modern
evangelical church. It was John Nelson Darby who is credited with developing
the pre-tribulation rapture theory, which he extensively taught and
popularized. This theory suggests that Christ will remove the Church from the
world before the period of tribulation. Darby, an influential figure among the
original Plymouth Brethren, is considered the father of modern
dispensationalism and futurism¹². His teachings had a significant impact on the
Bible Church and evangelical Christianity, particularly through the spread of
dispensationalism and his Bible translations¹. Darby's ideas were further
popularized in the United States in the early 20th century, notably by the
Scofield Reference Bible².
Source: Conversation with Copilot, 6/3/2024
(1) John Nelson Darby | Ligonier Ministries.
https://www.ligonier.org/podcasts/5-minutes-in-church-history-with-stephen-nichols/john-nelson-darby.
(2) John Nelson Darby - Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Nelson_Darby.
(3) Who was John Nelson Darby? | GotQuestions.org.
https://www.gotquestions.org/John-Nelson-Darby.html.
(4) Is the pre-tribulational rapture theory biblical?.
https://www.equip.org/bible_answers/is-the-pre-tribulational-rapture-theory-biblical/.
What parts of Darby’s doctrine had originated from
Cardinal Bellarmine’s counter-reformation propaganda?
John Nelson Darby's development of dispensationalism was
influenced by a variety of sources, including earlier works by Jesuit
theologians such as Francisco Ribera and Cardinal Robert Bellarmine. While
Darby is recognized as the father of dispensationalism, his ideas were not
entirely original but rather built upon earlier theological concepts. The
writings of Ribera and Bellarmine contained ideas that laid the groundwork for
the future development of dispensationalism. These works were initially intended
to counter the Protestant Reformation's interpretation of the Book of
Revelation, which identified the Pope as the Antichrist and the Catholic Church
as the whore of Babylon¹.
It's important to note that while Darby may have been
influenced by the works of these Jesuit theologians, his own doctrine was
distinct and developed within the context of his time and religious
environment. Darby's dispensationalism emphasized what he falsely thought was a
literal interpretation of the Bible and the separation of God's plans for
Israel and the Church, which became a cornerstone of his theological
framework¹.
Source: Conversation with Copilot, 6/3/2024
(1) Dispensationalism and Its Influence on Eschatology.
https://www.jamesjpn.net/basic-bible/dispensationalism-and-its-influence-on-eschatology/.
(2) The Purpose and Origins of Futurism - Christian
Observer. https://christianobserver.net/the-purpose-and-origins-of-futurism/.
(3) The History Of Dispensationalism - Christian
Observer. https://christianobserver.net/the-history-of-dispensationalism/.
(4) John Nelson Darby - Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Nelson_Darby.
(5) Rapture Doctrine invented by John Darby in 1830 AD -
The Interactive Bible.
https://bible.ca/rapture-origin-john-nelson-darby-1830ad.htm.
So, I have a question to those of you who consider
themselves to be Bible believing Christians. How are we to fight Cultural
Marxist Critical Theory and its concerted attack on our faith if we have
swallowed the lies of the Enemy to believe in false doctrines which were not
received in Apostolic succession from the founders of the Western gentile
Church? Persecution is coming for the Church so we must prepare ourselves. The
word “rapture” does not appear in the Bible since it is not Scriptural. Christ
will return and may we be found to be prepared when He does as we busy
ourselves equipping His body for that return! Fulfilling this Divine commission
is the only way we can stave off the ruin of godless Critical Theory in all of its
manifestations whether that be gender or race theory since these false
doctrines have now managed to infect the weaker churches who themselves have
become WOKE!
The phrase "Be instant in season and out of
season" is a Biblical reference from **2 Timothy 4:2**¹²³. In the King
James Version of the Bible, the verse reads: "Preach the word; be instant
in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all long suffering and
doctrine."¹²³.
This verse is part of a charge that the Apostle Paul gives
to Timothy, his disciple. The phrase "be instant in season, out of
season" is often interpreted to mean that one should be ready to proclaim
the word of God at all times, whether it is convenient or not¹²³⁴⁵.
Different translations of the Bible may use different
wording, but the general message remains the same: to be prepared to always
preach the word of God, and to correct, rebuke, and encourage with patience and
sound teaching¹²³⁴⁵. So fat bloated lesbians aside whose attempt at being
blasphemous has merely revealed yet another blasphemy, namely the worship of
graven images!
Source: Conversation with Copilot, 2024-06-06
(1) 2 Timothy 4:2 Preach the word; be prepared in season
and out of season .... https://biblehub.com/2_timothy/4-2.htm.
(2) 2 Timothy 4:2 KJV - Preach the word; be instant in
season, - Bible Gateway.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2%20Timothy%204%3A2&version=KJV.
(3) 2 Timothy 4:2 KJV - Preach the word; be instant in
season, out of .... https://www.blueletterbible.org/verse/kjv/2ti/4/2/.
(4) Instant In Season And Out Of Season - Ernest Angley
Ministries.
https://www.ernestangley.org/read/article/instant_in_season_and_out_of_season.
(5) What does it mean to pray in season and out of
season?.
https://www.missionariesofprayer.org/2017/04/pray-preach-the-word-in-season-and-out-of-season/.
