Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Understanding the architecture of belief

 


Why I am a man of belief: I need to know why others believe in a false version of reality

When I say that I am a man of belief most would think that I am referring to my personal system of faith but in this context that is not what I am referring to. Rather I am seeking to understand what motivates people to behave as they do on the most fundamental level. I seek to understand how people come to perceive the world since this defines how they will interact with others. Since I have this deep need to understand how others perceive reality it is painfully obvious to me that reality is the last thing that is often sought to be understood. To understand this process better, we must first delve into the realm of Jungian psychology. Jung theorized that the parts of a person’s psyche that have failed to be integrated into a complete personality will simply refuse to be denied. Rather these unintegrated sub-personas will project themselves out onto the world at large. So, when I state that I am a man of belief what I am referring to is the phenomenon of identifying how people come to believe what they believe and interact with others as a result. This reactionary behaviour was labelled by Dr. Jung as “shadow projection”. To develop this understanding one must first identify the effects that the unintegrated parts of our personality dictate how we will perceive the world around us and interact socially in it. For it is these unintegrated sub-personas that will paint the canvas of our perceptions. This results in our false perceptions being laid out in identifiable patterns of repeated self-defeating behaviours.

Dr. Leon Festinger's brilliant work on Cognitive Dissonance explains in brutal clarity that a mountain of evidence presented to an individual who is possessed by their unintegrated shadow often fails to persuade them to relinquish beliefs that the evidence presented has demonstrated to be false. Quite the opposite in fact. Evidence presented to an individual captured by their own shadow will only cause them to double down on beliefs driven by the projection of the very shadow that they deny and repress. Moreover, their shadow will attack any and all who seek to enlighten them for they fear the light that could reveal the unintegrated parts they desperately seek to keep hidden.

Since the shadow is not the whole and complete individual it operates as a sub-persona that reduces the world into a state of reductionism which rejects complexity and nuance. In fact, it has been my experience that any attempt to reason or debate with a person captured by their unintegrated shadow will merely repeat Dr. Festingers’ experiment in Cognitive Dissonance. Since an individual thus captured by their own shadow is completely unaware of the things that actually create their own belief system, they run about projecting their shadow onto others wondering why people react as they do to their false grasp of reality. Narcissism is a mechanism the psyche often employs to protect the shadow from being exposed to the light. The narcissist’s prime task in life is to find others who will validate their lack of psychological integration. This is known as seeking for narcissistic supply. To a narcissist thus driven by their unintegrated shadow others exist only for their validation since the farce must be substantiated by others who will play along with their delusional ideation.

This sadly is why politics is a realm where unindividuated people with reductionist views of reality play their sick narcissistic game to project their twisted understanding of how the world ought to operate onto the body politic. The only thing that can end this sick dance is to expose the fact that the emperor’s new set of clothes ain’t nothing but a birthday suit. It is so easy, at least for me, to uncover what beliefs motivate our political class where diplomacy, nuance, maturity and self-awareness are swept away by a torrent of shadow projection where anyone who dares to challenge the naked emperor will be vilified. Challenging the psychologically unwhole narcissist will invariably be met with disdain and contempt to the point where the narcissist’s shadow will demand that those who see reality for what it is must be silenced and indeed by force if necessary. This is precisely why we are seeing legislation currently being drafted aimed at silencing dissent by making telling the truth a hate crime.

In summary: My reflections touch on profound psychological and philosophical themes. In exploring the intersection of belief, perception, and psychological integration, through the lenses of Carl Jung’s shadow theory and Leon Festinger’s cognitive dissonance.


🔍 Understanding Belief Through the Shadow

When I say that I am a "man of belief," I am not referring to dogma or doctrine, but rather to a quest to understand the architecture of belief itself—how people construct their realities, often unconsciously. This is a powerful stance, because it shifts the focus from what people believe to why they believe it.

Jung’s concept of the shadow—the unconscious parts of ourselves we deny or repress—offers us a compelling framework. These unintegrated aspects don’t disappear; they manifest externally through projection, shaping how individuals perceive others and the world. This projection creates a distorted lens, often leading to self-defeating behaviors, tribalism, and ideological rigidity.


🧠 Cognitive Dissonance and the Defense of False Realities

Festinger’s theory of cognitive dissonance complements Jung’s ideas. When confronted with evidence that contradicts deeply held beliefs, individuals often experience psychological discomfort. Rather than revise their beliefs, they may:

  • Double down on their existing views.
  • Rationalize or reinterpret the evidence.
  • Attack the source of the contradiction.

This is especially true when those beliefs are tied to the shadow, because acknowledging the truth would mean confronting painful, repressed aspects of the self.


🧍‍♂️ Narcissism and the Need for Validation

My connection between narcissism and shadow projection is important since narcissistic behavior should be seen as a defense mechanism to shield the ego from the vulnerability of integration. The narcissist seeks external validation to maintain their fragile self-image, often manipulating others into reinforcing their delusions. This dynamic is particularly visible in political and ideological arenas, where power and identity are at stake.


🏛️ Politics as a Stage for Shadow Projection

Politics has become a theater for collective shadow projection. Leaders and followers alike may operate from unexamined beliefs, projecting their fears and desires onto opponents. The result is a reductionist worldview that resists nuance and vilifies dissent. The metaphor of the “emperor’s new clothes” is apt since truth-tellers are often punished for exposing uncomfortable realities.


💡 Where Do We Go From Here?

My analysis raises a vital question: How can we foster psychological integration and collective maturity? Here are some possibilities:

  • Promoting self-awareness through education, therapy, and introspection. Most importantly the Christian life itself is one of self examination for a Christian knows that he or she is his or her worst enemy           2 Corinthians 13:5- “Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith; prove your own selves. Know ye not your own selves, how that Jesus Christ is in you, except ye be reprobates?”
  • Encouraging dialogue that values complexity over certainty.
  • Creating spaces where dissent is not only tolerated but respected.
  • Recognizing projection in ourselves and others as a path to empathy.
  • Recognizing the limits of empathy, though can empathise with the narcissist’s ideological possession this does not mean that we should have suicidal empathy for ideas that are deconstructing the very foundations of functional civil order and discourse

Sunday, October 26, 2025

What the loss of our manufacturing sector means to the Canadian economy

 


What the loss of our manufacturing sector means to the Canadian economy

Today’s Sunday Sermon is intended to help you understand precisely why our government is deliberately implementing the socioeconomic ruin of Canada. Ayn Rand saw laissez-faire capitalism as the only moral social system because it is based on individual rights, including property rights, and requires a government that acts as a "purely" protective force. She defined it as a system with no government intervention in the economy and viewed it as a "separation of state and economics," similar to the separation of church and state. Rand argued that in this system, all relationships are voluntary, and the government's sole role is to protect individual rights by banning the use of physical force, fraud, and theft. 

So, when a country loses much of its manufacturing base to become primarily a hub for warehousing and office-based services, it will face a range of economic, social, and strategic consequences. Here's a breakdown of what Canada is losing due to its bonkers bargain with a banker:


1. Economic Resilience and Self-Sufficiency

  • Loss of Industrial Base: Manufacturing provides the backbone for many other sectors. Without it, a country becomes dependent on imports for essential goods, including critical items like medical supplies, electronics, and machinery.
  • Trade Deficits: Importing more than exporting can lead to persistent trade imbalances, weakening the national currency and increasing debt.
  • Vulnerability to Supply Chain Disruptions: Global crises (like pandemics or geopolitical tensions) can severely impact countries that rely heavily on foreign manufacturing.

2. Middle-Class Jobs and Upward Mobility

  • Job Polarization: Manufacturing traditionally offers well-paying jobs for people without college degrees. Losing these jobs can hollow out the middle class, leaving only high-skill office jobs and low-wage service work.
  • Regional Decline: Industrial towns and regions may suffer long-term economic decline, leading to unemployment, poverty, and social unrest.

3. Innovation and Technological Capability

  • Loss of “Learning by Doing”: Manufacturing drives innovation through hands-on problem-solving and iterative improvements. Without it, “Research & Development” can become disconnected from practical application.
  • Weakened Ecosystem: Advanced manufacturing often supports high-tech sectors like aerospace, robotics, and clean energy. Losing it can erode national competitiveness.

4. National Security Risks

  • Strategic Dependence: Relying on other countries for critical goods (e.g., semiconductors, defense components) can be dangerous in times of conflict or political tension.
  • Reduced Defense Readiness: A strong manufacturing base is essential for producing military equipment and maintaining defense infrastructure.

5. Cultural and Social Identity

  • Loss of Industrial Heritage: Manufacturing often shapes national identity and pride. Its decline can lead to a sense of cultural loss and disconnection.
  • Community Fragmentation: Factory closures can devastate communities, leading to population decline, mental health issues, and social fragmentation.

What Remains?

  • Service Economy Growth: Finance, tech, logistics, and design may thrive, but they often benefit a narrower segment of the population.
  • Global Integration: Countries may become hubs for global coordination, logistics, and innovation—but at the cost of local production capacity.

Canada’s loss of its auto manufacturing sector—especially the recent decline accelerated by trade tensions and corporate shifts—has had profound economic, social, and strategic consequences. Here's a detailed look at what Canada is losing:


🇨🇦 Key Impacts of the Auto Sector Decline in Canada

1. Massive Job Losses

  • Direct job losses: Stellantis' decision to move Jeep Compass production from Brampton to Illinois will cost 3,000 direct jobs at the Brampton Assembly Plant[1].
  • Ripple effects: Up to 12,000 jobs in the auto parts supply chain are at risk due to plant idlings and production cuts in Windsor and Ingersoll[1].
  • Regional unemployment: Ontario’s unemployment rate has risen to 7.9%, higher than the national average of 7.1%, largely due to manufacturing losses[2].

2. Economic Vulnerability

  • Production collapse: Canada’s share of North American vehicle production fell to 7.6%, the lowest in over 30 years[3].
  • Trade imbalance: With 85–90% of Canadian-made vehicles exported to the U.S., tariffs have severely disrupted this flow, threatening billions in revenue[4].
  • Investment flight: Stellantis is investing \$13 billion in U.S. operations, creating 5,000 American jobs while pulling back from Canadian commitments[5].

3. Community and Social Fallout

  • Ghost plants: Cities like Brampton and Ingersoll face the prospect of shuttered factories and economic decline[1].
  • Generational disruption: Families with multiple generations in auto work are seeing their livelihoods vanish, with few alternatives offering similar pay or stability[6].

4. Strategic and Industrial Weakening

  • Loss of innovation hubs: Auto manufacturing supports R&D, engineering, and advanced manufacturing. Its decline weakens Canada’s industrial ecosystem.
  • Supply chain unraveling: Canada’s integrated supply chains with the U.S. are being reshaped by protectionist policies, making Canadian suppliers less competitive[2].

5. Political and Policy Challenges

  • Government response: Ottawa has reduced import quotas for GM and Stellantis in retaliation, but critics argue more aggressive action is needed[7]. Ottawa and Ontario have deliberately sabotaged our critical relationship with sister plants located in the US ignoring that the auto sector is inextricably linked to other factories in the US, Mexico and beyond. Instead of negotiating with Trump to end tariffs both the federal and provincial government’s lack of diplomacy and common sense have placed our auto sector in a crisis that may well sever over a century of interconnected cooperation between Canada and the US as Canada’s primary trading partner.
  • Calls for a national strategy: Leaders like Brampton’s mayor are urging a coordinated federal plan to retain jobs and attract future investment but in fact Patrick Brown has foolishly suggested that retaliatory tariffs are the answer to a trade war thereby annoying the American administration further which has prevented achieving a viable trade agreement. No one wins a trade war and someone ought to tell the fools who know nothing about how the economy actually works! [8].

🔄 What Might Replace It?

While Canada is investing in electric vehicle battery production (e.g., Windsor’s NextStar Energy plant), these projects are not yet offsetting the losses in traditional auto manufacturing. The transition is slow and uncertain, basically since electric vehicles hide the pollution at the beginning of the process making its significant impacts on the environment less obvious to the general public. Moreover, especially in the intense cold of Canadian winters and due to the lack of infrastructure electric vehicles face severe limitations operating in Canada’s harsh conditions. Canada simply does not have sufficient supply of electrical generation to power electric vehicles if it continues to refuse to use LP gas, coal, and nuclear to provide power to the grid needed to make electric cars and trucks viable.


Here’s the visualization showing Canada’s auto sector employment vs vehicle production trends (2005–2025):

canada_auto_trends

Key Insights

  • Employment Decline: From ~17,000 in 2005 to under 9,000 in 2021, before a modest recovery to ~12,700 in 2025.
  • Production Collapse: From a peak of 3.06M units in 1999 to just 1.11M in 2021, recovering slightly to 1.55M in 2023.
  • Correlation: Both metrics show steep declines during global crises and trade tensions, with employment lagging behind production recovery.

In Conclusion:

You will note that I have used data accessed from the 4th Estate in case some of you on the left will attempt to say I have exaggerated how dire our situation is under Mark Carney’s reign of centralizing authoritarian control by taxation, theft, and kleptocracy.

According to the Bible, God condemns ruinous economies and government corruption because they are rooted in injustice, greed, and oppression of the vulnerable. The Scriptures promise divine judgment for those who exploit power for personal gain and offer a vision of a society based on righteousness and justice. [1, 2, 3, 4]


Condemnation of corruption and unjust rulers:

Biblical prophets and writers consistently speak out against corrupt leaders who abuse their power and exploit the poor.

  • Exploitation and bribery: Prophets like Isaiah and Micah condemn rulers and judges who accept bribes and conspire to oppress the needy and the powerless, such as orphans and widows.
  • Systemic corruption: The book of Ecclesiastes observes a flawed system of government where every level of authority exploits those below it. The resulting social decay and instability are directly linked to the greed of those in power.
  • A contrast in leadership: The Proverbs draw a clear distinction: "When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice; but when a wicked man rules, the people groan". Justice from a leader brings stability, while greed tears a country down.
  • Divine wrath: The New Testament warns that earthly rulers are "God's servants" who bring judgment on evildoers. God is not ambivalent toward evil and will not tolerate injustice. [1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]

The dangers of greed and materialism

The Bible attributes economic ruin and other societal troubles to the love of money, greed, and the unjust acquisition of wealth.

  • A root of evil: The New Testament warns, "the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil. Some people, eager for money, have wandered from the faith".
  • Consequences of greed: The greedy are said to bring trouble on their families, while those who refuse bribes will prosper. The book of James condemns the wealthy who hoard their riches and defraud their workers, declaring that their hoarded wealth will be a testimony against them.
  • Foolishness of hoarding: Jesus's parable of the rich fool warns against the folly of placing trust in material possessions, emphasizing that earthly wealth can be lost at any moment. [12, 13, 14, 15]

God's expectation for a just society

God's word provides a framework for leaders and citizens to act with integrity and compassion, which can help prevent economic and political ruin.

  • Justice for the vulnerable: Biblical law demands that society provide for the poor, the alien, and the oppressed. Verses in Leviticus and Deuteronomy require gleanings from fields to be left for the poor and that laborers' wages be paid daily.
  • The path to healing: In Chronicles, God promises to "hear from heaven and will forgive their sin and heal their land" if his people humble themselves and turn from their wicked ways.
  • A call to act justly: The prophet Micah offers a clear summary of God's requirements: "To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God". This call is directed at both individual believers and those in positions of authority.
  • Divine sovereignty: Ultimately, God is portrayed as the supreme ruler who will one day establish his kingdom of perfect justice and righteousness, banishing all injustice forever. [3, 8, 17, 18, 19]

 

[1] https://biblehub.com/topical/d/denunciation_of_corrupt_rulers.htm

[2] https://biblehub.com/topical/c/corrupt_leadership.htm

[3] https://thebibleteachesthis.com/bible-verses-about-government-corruption/

[4] https://www.faithfi.com/faithfi/financial-injustice-6415

[5] https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ecclesiastes+5:8&version=NET

[6] https://thebibleteachesthis.com/bible-verses-about-corrupt-leaders/

[7] https://www.cgg.org/index.cfm/library/verses/id/3360/leadership-corrupt-verses.htm

[8] https://www.openbible.info/topics/goverment_corruption

[9] https://thebibleteachesthis.com/bible-verses-about-corrupt-leaders/

[10] https://www.challies.com/what-god-hates/god-hates-injustice/

[11] https://biblehub.com/topical/e/economic_collapse.htm

[12] https://www.facebook.com/groups/145465624138507/posts/1122509429767450/

[13] https://biblehub.com/proverbs/15-27.htm

[14] https://biblehub.com/topical/e/economic_ruin.htm

[15] https://www.biblestudytools.com/topical-verses/bible-verses-about-greed/

[16] https://aeegroup.co.za/uncategorized/embracing-biblical-values/

[17] https://sojo.net/list-some-more-2000verses-scripture-poverty-and-justice

[18] https://www.gotquestions.org/Bible-injustice.html

[19] https://www.facebook.com/groups/1845818145630426/posts/4005056309706588/



 


References

[1] iPolitics

[2] World Socialist Web Site

[3] thedeepdive.ca

[4] www.thecarmagazine.com

[5] www.politico.com

[6] Global News

[7] www.canada.ca

[8] insauga

[9] CodeInterpreter

 

 

 

Monday, October 20, 2025

The failure of the post WWII liberal vision for global stability

 


It was while living in Norway that I first learned about the agenda of the radical left. The Postmodern left has hidden its soul crushing agenda behind feel good virtue signalling. It was then that I first began to understand that we were headed toward the utter collapse of the post WWII vision for humanity. This vision has failed for the simple reason that it blended Neo-Marxism with fascism. Postwar globalism depends on central planning and regulation of the economy where industry is only permitted to produce what the unelected global order deems to be viable and “sustainable”. This despite the complete failure of their green agenda which they have promoted with religious zeal. We live under government regulated media since the 4th Estate has become the propaganda tool of unelected kleptocrats used to promote their dystopian vision for humanity. Within this post war global order, we see elements of Marxism and Fascism blended into the bastard child of the two ideologies we spent much of the 20th Century fighting. My very real fear is that we are so far into the complete adoption of these ideas and the resultant failures of mass immigration that we cannot turn the tide. Unvetted immigration has had one primary goal, to kill off through attrition and age anyone who remembers what it was like to have even a modicum of individual liberty. Most fundamentally due to censorship it has become virtually impossible for the free market of ideas to offer an alternative narrative. The West has become what the Islamists refer to as “a woman to be mounted”. This is why the left allies themselves with radical political Islam since both are illiberal, authoritarian, and anti-Christian. Both seek to destroy what little remains of the very concept of what it means to be a Christian Westerner. In a very real way Hitler, Stalin, and Mao won the ideological battle, and as a result the West has lost much of its freedom. This attack on our foundational values started in our treasonous universities who have for decades taught pure ideological poison to our kids at the taxpayers’ expense! So, thank you, Norway, for opening my eyes while labelling me as a Neo-Nazi for taking an active interest in my wife's culture while doing my best to learn how to speak Norwegian in my 60’s!

It was in Norway where I developed a strongly critical perspective of our current global political and social trends. In the decade since my return to Canada I have seen my worst fears come to fruition under the Liberal Party of Canada which has exceeded the socialist mind-meld I encountered while in Norway. Canada has become the manifestation of a Star Trek episode where the Borg captured the crew members to turn them into machines. The following criticisms touch on a complex set of interconnected political, economic, and social anxieties. So, I will attempt to identify and summarize my concerns as they relate to political philosophy and current events.

Core Themes of Concern

The central thesis of my message revolves around my conviction that a powerful, authoritarian global agenda is being implemented, systematically dismantling the foundations of Western civilization.


Political and Economic Control

  • Critique of Post-WWII Vision: I reject the established post-World War II global order, viewing its foundations as inherently flawed and rooted in "Neo-Marxism conflated with a Fascist economy"
  • Centralized Regulation: I am deeply concerned over the blending of state regulation and industry, where production is dictated by what the unelected "global order deems to be viable and 'sustainable'," pointing to the failure of the "green agenda."
  • Propaganda and Media Control: I see the media ("the 4th Estate") as compromised and acting as a "propaganda tool" for unelected globalist powers.
  • Hybrid Authoritarianism: I argue that the current system is an "illegitimate bastard child" that draws on elements of both Marxism and Fascism to create a new form of totalitarianism.

Social and Cultural Downfall

  • Erosion of Liberty: Individual liberty is being systematically eroded.
  • Impact of Immigration: Mass immigration is a policy with the primary purpose of causing cultural attrition to eliminate those who remember a freer society.
  • Decline of Western Values: I assert that the combination of these authoritarian ideas has suppressed the "free market of ideas" and the "Christian morality" which I credit as being the primary foundation for Western liberty.
  • The Role of Education: I blame the Western Academy for teaching our youth " ideological poison" that has led to our cultural decline.

Perceived Global Alliance

  • Authoritarian Coalition: I am deeply concerned between an illiberal alliance of the powerful global forces and radical political Islam, based on their shared foundation of being illiberal and authoritarian while seeking to destroy Christianity and our Western identity.

What I experienced in Norway, was personally frustrating due to the false labels that were being applied to me. This experience served as a catalyst for solidifying my views about the postwar Postmodern Cultural Relativist agenda. Let me be clear, I feel a deep sense of betrayal accompanied by a profound sense of worry about the future of freedom and Western identity. Moreover, these thoughts do not include what I witnessed the senior management of the Norwegian Defence Department, and the Foreign Affairs Department do to my wife which must remain a topic for another blog. Suffice it to say, no good deed she did ever went unpunished. Particularly if it brought to public attention the gross inefficiencies of the Norwegian bureaucracy to properly address the needs of the Norwegian taxpayer.

My conclusions:
After WWII the West was foolish enough to attempt to wage a kinetic war against what it viewed as its ideological enemies when the real war was occurring on the intellectual front. Our leaders ought to have addressed the ideological capture of our schools, universities, and our institutions of government. Soldiers are not trained to fight ideologies. The fight against ideological possession ought to have been left to our systems of governance and education but instead these institutions have indoctrinated our kids into the very ideologies that we once fought with the physical weapons of war. Said weapons are useless in fighting toxic ideology but the military-industrial complex in league with the Postwar global order still demanded their pound of flesh. The flesh of our young whom they have sent to die needlessly when the real fight ought to have been waged here at home to reclaim our institutions as servants of the people not slaves to some unelected globalist gang of plutocrats and kleptocrats.

 

 

 

Saturday, October 18, 2025

The two great evils of Postmodernism and Critical Theory

 


Postmodern Cultural Relativism has eroded our common cultural narratives and shared values thereby undermining the cohesive identity and consistent principles that historically have defined Canadian governance. This shift has fragmented societal cohesion, complicated policymaking, and ultimately challenges the foundations of our national unity. This in short explains why Canada feels so broken under our current governing plutocratic elite.

Our government long ago broke faith with its citizens, yet we have continued to vote for this tyranny! So why is this happening to us? It is happening because it appeals to Canadians' sense of empathy for the little guy, yet instead of protecting the downtrodden the valid emotion of empathy has been weaponized by the radical left. By stealth they have taken the long march through our institutions to capture them from within. As a result, our natural inclination to be empathetic has been weaponized to destroy the very nature of Canadian parliamentary democracy. God save us from the kleptocracy that captured our government!

This touches on some complex and deeply debated ideas around cultural identity, governance, and political theory. I want to unpack the concepts of Postmodern Cultural Relativism, Critical Theory, and Cultural Marxism in a clear and honest way.

Here's a brief overview of the key ideological concepts:

Postmodern Cultural Relativism

This is the idea that values, norms, and truths are not universal but are instead shaped by cultural context. Postmodernism often challenges grand narratives and fixed truths, promoting skepticism toward institutions and traditional authority. Cultural relativism within this framework suggests that no single culture's values are inherently superior to another's. This flies in the face of Cultural Marxist Critical Race, Gender, and Climate Catastrophizing Theory which are in fact “grand narratives”.

Critical Theory

A type of grand narrative originating from the Frankfurt School in the early 20th century, Critical Theory seeks to critique and change society by examining power structures, ideologies, and social injustices. It often focuses on how societal institutions perpetuate inequality and aims to empower marginalized groups. Most importantly Critical Theory is a method of examining Marxism since Marxist ideas constantly evolve. The obvious reason for this is that Marxism itself doesn’t work in a practical sense hence the need for it to constantly adjust its core premises. However, the one thing which remains consistent is its loathing for free market capitalism.

Cultural Marxism

Some claim this term is controversial and often misused, but is it? Originally it referred to the application of Marxist ideas to cultural analysis—looking at how culture can reinforce class structures. However, in recent years, "Cultural Marxism" has been used in political rhetoric to describe perceived leftist influence in institutions. The reason for this assumption has come from the writings of renowned leftists who themselves stated that they would take the long march through our institutions to capture them from within. The long march through the institutions (German: der lange Marsch durch die Institutionen) is a slogan coined by socialist student activist Rudi Dutschke around 1967 to describe his strategy to create radical change in government (particularly West Germany) by becoming part of it. The phrase "long march" is a reference to the physical Long March of the Chinese communist army. Nevertheless, many scholars argue that this usage is misleading and conflates different intellectual traditions even though I will use the left’s own language to prove otherwise.

How They Interact:

  • Postmodernism undermines universal narratives, which can weaken shared cultural foundations.
  • Critical Theory critiques existing power structures, including those within culture, education, and governance.
  • Even though Postmodernism denies the existence of a grand narrative the new left nevertheless combines these frameworks into a grand narrative that challenges traditional institutions and values, which has tremendous destabilizing affects though the left argues that destabilization is necessary for social progress. Now that is quite an assertion.  How can destroying civil society promote civility when these radical leftist ideologies advocate for violent protests and civil disobedience?

Let us do a deeper dive into how these ideas have influenced Canadian institutions or policymaking and explore alternative perspectives on national unity and governance. So here is a comprehensive breakdown of how Postmodern Cultural Relativism, Critical Theory, and Cultural Marxism have influenced Canadian governance, institutions, and national identity—and how these ideas interact with each other.

🔍 1. Postmodern Cultural Relativism in Canadian Governance

Postmodernism challenges the idea of universal truths and promotes the view that values are culturally constructed. In Canada, this has manifested through:

  • Multiculturalism Policy: Since 1971, Canada has embraced multiculturalism, allowing diverse cultural groups to maintain their traditions while participating in mainstream society. This policy has helped redefine Canadian national identity as inclusive and pluralistic[1].
  • Governance Impacts: While multiculturalism has fostered integration and reduced anti-immigrant backlash, critics like myself argue it has also led to fragmented identities and weakened shared civic values, complicating policy-making and national cohesion[2]. Especially given the fact that we are currently witnessing aggressive anti-Semitism here in Canada which is accompanied by violent radical Islamic protests .

🧠 2. Critical Theory’s Influence on Canadian Institutions

Critical Theory, especially in its educational form (Critical Pedagogy), has gained traction in Canadian schools and universities:

  • Education: Ontario’s Ministry of Education has increasingly adopted Critical Theory language, focusing on identity, power, and systemic oppression. Critics argue this shift undermines traditional literacy and numeracy goals, and may erode civic unity[3].
  • Libraries and Higher Education: Institutions like the CFLA-FCAB have embraced Critical Theory to address moral panics and promote inclusivity, though this has sparked debates about neutrality and ideological bias[4]. Many renowned professors such as Dr. Gad Saad and Dr. Jordan B. Peterson have been sounding a warning for decades that our universities have become institutions for radical Neo-Marxist indoctrination.
  • Design and Curriculum: Canadian universities are using Critical Instructional Design to embed social justice into learning environments, especially in Indigenous education and health programs[5]. This even though injustices remain at an all time high with open and violent outburst against both Jews and Christians. Synagogues are attacked and Churches have been burnt, yet our radical leftist government refuses to address these problems effectively while merely doubling down on its failed Neo-Marxist policies.

🧩 3. Cultural Marxism: Contested Concept and Canadian Context

The term "Cultural Marxism" is claimed to be highly controversial despite this is a term invented by the left. It astounds me how the left becomes enraged when we throw their own words back at them:

  • Origins and Usage: It refers to the idea that Marxist principles have shifted from economic class struggle to cultural institutions. Critics claim this has led to ideological capture of education and media[6].
  • Academic Debate: Scholars argue that while Marxist-inspired critiques of culture exist (e.g., Gramsci, Frankfurt School), the term "Cultural Marxism" is often poorly understood. This is true for the simple reason that leftist rhetoric is often incomprehensible and deliberately arcane.
  • Policy and Identity: Some view multiculturalism and progressive education as vehicles for disseminating Cultural Marxist ideas, while others see them as necessary for equity and inclusion[8]. The fact remains that none of the left’s stated goals are being achieved, in fact the outcome of their policies has resulted in the diametric opposite of their favourite word, “progressism”.

🇨🇦 4. National Unity and Cultural Identity in Canada

Canada’s identity has (de)evolved through multiculturalism, failed reconciliation efforts, and debates over what constitutes shared values:

  • Multiculturalism vs. Unity: While multiculturalism is claimed to be a source of pride, it hasn’t translated into support for reconciliation with Indigenous peoples. That problem, despite all claims, has proven to be unsolvable using the government’s so-called progressive policies. Collective multicultural ideals in shaping civic engagement has also destroyed the very idea of the sovereign and autonomous individual [9].
  • Cultural Institutions: Institutions like CBC/Radio-Canada were created to foster national unity, but their role is increasingly politicized, especially in elections. In fact, they have become the Canadian government’s version of Reichs-Rundfunk-Gesellschaft (RRG) or Reich Broadcasting Corporation, which was used extensively for Nazi propaganda after 1933. Overseen by Joseph Goebbels's Reich Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda, the RRG's broadcasts were controlled and used to indoctrinate the German public and promote Nazi ideology. That is precisely what the CBC has become, the propaganda mouthpiece of the PMO! [10].
  • Identity Crisis: Some argue Canada lacks a cohesive identity beyond “not being the U.S.” and needs a clearer vision rooted in shared values like fairness and resilience and I second this argument but would go further! We literally no longer know who we are. [11].

And frankly we no longer know who we are because we no longer know who God is. Without the Grand Narrative provided by Christianity the entire enchilada comes toppling down. We can see this with brutal clarity today.

2 Chronicles 7:14 King James Version

14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.

 


References

[1] academic.oup.com

[2] link.springer.com

[3] www.researchgate.net

[4] safs.ca

[5] link.springer.com

[6] safs.ca

[7] theconversation.com

[8] www.erudit.org

[9] www.tandfonline.com

[10] www.cbc.ca

[11] manusharma.ca

 

 

Understanding the architecture of belief

  Why I am a man of belief: I need to know why others believe in a false version of reality When I say that I am a man of belief most woul...