Background as to why we are approaching a singularity:
The danger we face today is that there is nothing left that
we could agree on. The classical liberal values which posited that everyone
ought to have access to the free market irrespective of race, creed, colour,
beliefs, etc. while being treated identically under the law has been replaced
with a singular calamity where identity is all that matters. This is returning
us to violent fractional warfare where humanity is self destructing. Note that
every violent clash is due to identity politics. Also note that the military-industrial
complex thrives on such conflicts. Then there's the fact that the litany of
arbitrary identities that humanity is creating is completely irrational since
they are founded on pure fiction. We have literally rejected everything that
worked in an attempt to create a world which cannot exist and are completely
willing to murder one another with impunity in a vain attempt to turn unreality
into reality. A wealthy globalist elite who are invested in the
military-industrial complex exist to exacerbate this tribalism. These
organizations function solely to promote division and identity politics which
is why every one of them has D.E.I. as one of their key doctrines. And in this “new
world disorder” God is deliberately left absent from the equation. Therefore,
although the issues our ancestors faced were not identical to our own, they
share enough in common with our present challenges to provide us with a map that
could possibly stave off this impending disaster.
Why English Common Law was vital to the
founding of America and in drafting its constitution:
Indeed, English common law played a significant role in the
establishment of America and its constitution. The United States and most
Commonwealth countries are heirs to the common law legal tradition of English
law⁴. Certain practices traditionally allowed under English common law were
expressly outlawed by the Constitution, such as bills of attainder and general
search warrants⁴.
After the American Revolutionary War, one of the first acts
of the new government was to adopt existing English common law in full, unless
it contradicted the U.S. Constitution⁵. This included many traditions of
British common law, including habeas corpus and jury trials⁵.
However, the legal systems rooted in the English common law
have diverged from their parent system over time. In many areas, the legal
approaches of common-law countries differ as much from one another as they do
from civil-law countries¹. For instance, England has no written constitution
and restricts judicial review, whereas every court in the United States
possesses the power to pass judgment on the conformity of legislation and on
other official actions to constitutional norms¹.
So, while English common law formed the basis, the American
legal system has evolved in its own unique direction, influenced by the U.S.
Constitution and the needs of the American people¹²⁴⁵.
This statement from Bing ignores the fact that that is
exactly how English Common Law was intended to operate since it is based upon
case justice and not legislated edicts which come down from on high.
Source: Conversation with Bing, 2023-12-08
(1) Law of the United States - Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_the_United_States.
(2) Civil Law vs Common Law - Difference and Comparison |
Diffen. https://www.diffen.com/difference/Civil_Law_vs_Common_Law.
(3) Common law - English, American, Commonwealth |
Britannica.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/common-law/Comparisons-of-modern-English-American-and-Commonwealth-law.
(4) English Common Law | U.S. Constitution Annotated | US
Law | LII / Legal ....
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-1/section-8/clause-18/english-common-law.
(5) Right to keep and bear arms in the United States -
Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_keep_and_bear_arms_in_the_United_States.
How the UK’s traditions of constitutionalism differed
from that of America:
Dr. David Starkey, a renowned historian, has shared his
views on why Britain does not have a written constitution. He argues that the
absence of a written constitution has actually contributed to Britain's good
governance until very recently¹. According to him, there was a set of
absolutely binding precedent which was not broken¹.
He also points out that one of the great problems is that
when you have no written constitution, there is nothing that is actually
entrenched. It's only respect for convention that holds you back². This means
that the constitution is flexible and can adapt to changing circumstances, but
it also relies heavily on the respect and understanding of these conventions².
As for the term "constitutional monarchy", it
refers to a system where the monarch's powers are largely ceremonial, and the
real power lies with the Parliament and other elected representatives of the
people. The UK is considered a constitutional monarchy because the monarch (the
king or queen) is the head of state, while the Prime Minister is the head of
government. The laws and policies of the country are decided by the Parliament,
not by the monarch.
So, while the UK does not have a written constitution in
the way that countries like the United States do, it does have a system of laws
and conventions that function as a constitution. And the monarchy is part of
this system, but in a largely symbolic role.
Source: Conversation with Bing, 2023-12-08
(1) David Starkey brutally tears apart claims Britain
should have written ....
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1220818/brexit-news-britain-constitution-boris-johnson-us-style-david-starkey-spt.
(2) From the Archives: In Conversation with David Starkey.
https://www.iaindale.com/articles/from-the-archives-in-conversation-with-david-starkey.
(3) Historian's Alarming Rishi Sunak Claim Gets Firm
Rebuttal - HuffPost UK. https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/historian-david-starkey-rishi-sunak-coronation_uk_64538f8de4b0461603102da1.
The importance of the Glorious Revolution of
1688 to liberty under law:
The Glorious Revolution, also known as the Revolution of
1688, was a significant event in the history of England and had far-reaching
impacts. Here are some key events that occurred during the Glorious Revolution:
1. **Deposition of King James II**: The revolution resulted
in the deposition of English King James II¹. James II, who was Catholic,
supported the freedom of worship for Catholics and appointed Catholic officers
to the army². He also had close ties with France, which concerned many of the
English people².
2. **Accession of William III and Mary II**: James II's
daughter Mary II and her husband, William III, prince of Orange and stadholder
of the Netherlands, were invited by both Whig and Tory politicians to bring an
army to England to redress the nation’s grievances¹. They ascended to the
throne, replacing James II¹.
3. **Establishment of Constitutional Monarchy**: The
Glorious Revolution led to the establishment of an English nation that limited
the power of the king and provided protections for English subjects⁴. The 1689
Bill of Rights established a constitutional monarchy⁴.
4. **Supremacy of Parliament**: The revolution permanently
established Parliament as the ruling power of England—and, later, the United
Kingdom—representing a shift from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional
monarchy¹.
5. **Impact on the American Colonies**: News of the
Revolution spurred hopes of independence among the American colonists, leading
to several protests and uprisings against English rule⁵. The Glorious
Revolution served as the basis for constitutional law establishing and defining
governmental power, as well as the granting and limitation of rights⁵.
The Glorious Revolution was a pivotal moment in English
history, setting the stage for the development of modern democratic principles
and the rule of law¹²⁴⁵.
Source: Conversation with Bing, 2023-12-08
(1) Glorious Revolution | Summary, Significance, Causes,
& Facts. https://www.britannica.com/event/Glorious-Revolution.
(2) Glorious Revolution of 1688 - Definition & Summary
| HISTORY. https://www.history.com/topics/european-history/glorious-revolution.
(3) The Glorious Revolution and the English Empire – U.S.
History.
https://pressbooks.online.ucf.edu/osushistory/chapter/the-glorious-revolution-and-the-english-empire/.
(4) Glorious Revolution: Definition, History, and
Significance - ThoughtCo.
https://www.thoughtco.com/glorious-revolution-definition-4692528.
(5) BBC - History - British History in depth: The Glorious
Revolution. https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/civil_war_revolution/glorious_revolution_01.shtml.
The Bill of Rights of 1689 its guarantees of
liberty under law:
The Bill of Rights 1689, sometimes known as the Bill of
Rights 1688, is an Act of the Parliament of England that set out certain basic
civil rights and clarified who would be next to inherit the Crown¹. It remains
a crucial statute in English constitutional law¹.
The Bill of Rights was created in 1689 and received royal
assent on 16 December 1689¹. It is a restatement in statutory form of the
Declaration of Right presented by the Convention Parliament to William III and
Mary II in February 1689, inviting them to become joint sovereigns of England¹.
The Bill sets out a constitutional requirement for the
Crown to seek the consent of the people as represented in Parliament¹. As well
as setting limits on the powers of the monarch, it established the rights of
Parliament, including regular parliaments, free elections, and parliamentary
privilege¹. It also listed individual rights, including the prohibition of
cruel and unusual punishment and the right not to pay taxes levied without the
approval of Parliament¹.
The Bill of Rights 1689 is considered a basic document of
the uncodified British constitution, along with Magna Carta, the Petition of
Right, the Habeas Corpus Act 1679 and the Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949¹. It
was one of the models used to draft the United States Bill of Rights, the
United Nations Declaration of Human Rights and the European Convention on Human
Rights¹.
In terms of its importance to legal justice, the Bill of
Rights 1689 established several key principles that are fundamental to a fair
and just legal system. These include the right to a fair trial, the prohibition
of cruel and unusual punishment, and the principle that taxes cannot be levied
without the approval of Parliament¹. These principles have had a profound
impact on the development of legal systems around the world¹.
Source: Conversation with Bing, 2023-12-08
(1) Bill of Rights 1689 - Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_of_Rights_1689.
(2) Bill of Rights | History, Summary, & Facts |
Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Bill-of-Rights-British-history.
(3) English Bill of Rights - Definition & Legacy |
HISTORY.
https://www.history.com/topics/european-history/english-bill-of-rights.
(4) Bill of Rights 1689 - UK Parliament. https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/evolutionofparliament/parliamentaryauthority/revolution/collections1/collections-glorious-revolution/billofrights/.
Why the United Empire Loyalists refused to live
under French Civil Law after fleeing the newly formed United States to British
North America:
The United Empire Loyalists were American colonists who
remained loyal to Britain during the American Revolution¹². After the war, tens
of thousands of Loyalists migrated to British North America¹². Many of them did
not wish to become citizens of the new American republic or feared retribution
for their public support of the British⁵.
When they arrived in Canada, they brought with them a
desire for a colonial administration modeled under British institutions and
common law⁴⁸. This included English laws of land tenure⁸ and a push for more
representative government³⁶. They wanted laws and institutions that reflected
their British heritage, not those of France³⁶.
In response to the influx of these Loyalist settlers, Upper
Canada (modern-day Ontario) was created in 1791³⁷. This division allowed the
Loyalist American settlers and British immigrants in Upper Canada to live under
English laws and institutions⁷. Meanwhile, the French-speaking population of
Lower Canada (southern parts of present-day Quebec) could maintain French civil
law and the Catholic religion⁴⁷. This arrangement catered to the preferences of
both groups and helped maintain peace and order in the region.
Source: Conversation with Bing, 2023-12-10
(1) Loyalists in Canada | The Canadian Encyclopedia.
https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/loyalists.
(2) Loyalists in Canada (Plain-Language Summary) - The
Canadian Encyclopedia.
https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/loyalists-in-canada-plain-language-summary.
(3) Immigration to Canada | The Canadian Encyclopedia.
https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/immigration.
(4) United Empire Loyalist - Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Empire_Loyalist.
(5) The Canadas - Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Canadas.
(6) Upper Canada | The Canadian Encyclopedia.
https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/upper-canada.
(7) A History of Common and Civil Law in Canada | Insights.
https://www.pardonapplications.ca/articles/history-common-civil-law-canada/.
(8) Upper Canada - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upper_Canada.
The establishment of peace, order, and good
government as the defining principle upon which Canada ought to be governed:
The phrase "peace, order, and good government" is
used in section 91 of the British North America Act of 1867, now known as the
Constitution Act, 1867¹²³. This phrase provides a broad and somewhat vague
definition of the Canadian Parliament's lawmaking authority over provincial
matters¹².
The phrase was originally used in a British colonial
context to give local governments the power to make laws¹. Variants of the
phrase, such as "peace, welfare, and good government," appear in
several of Canada's founding documents leading up to Confederation in 1867².
Sections 91 and 92 of the Act set out the distribution of
federal and provincial powers². The reference to "peace, order, and good
government" establishes that the federal Parliament can make laws for the
peace, order, and good government of Canada, in relation to all matters not
coming within the classes of subjects assigned exclusively to the legislatures
of the provinces².
This provision, commonly referred to as the POGG power,
allocates residuary jurisdiction for the areas of law not otherwise set out in
sections 91 and 92 to the federal Parliament². Over the years, the POGG power
has been interpreted and used as a basis for federal legislation where there is
a gap in the distribution of federal and provincial powers, for matters of
national concern, and for emergency matters².
The phrase has also taken on a value of its own with
Canadians beyond its constitutional purpose. It has come to be seen as the
Canadian counterpart to the American "life, liberty and the pursuit of
happiness" and the French "liberty, equality, fraternity"¹.
Source: Conversation with Bing, 2023-12-10
(1) Peace, Order and Good Government | The Canadian
Encyclopedia.
https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/peace-order-and-good-government.
(2) ‘Welfare’ of a Nation: The Origins of ‘Peace, Order and
Good Government ....
https://hillnotes.ca/2017/04/26/welfare-of-a-nation-the-origins-of-peace-order-and-good-government/.
(3) Peace, Order and Good Government | The Canadian
Encyclopedia.
https://bing.com/search?q=phrase+peace+order+and+good+government+in+the+British+North+American+Act.
(4) Peace, order, and good government - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace,_order,_and_good_government.
My conclusions:
The question we must answer is how are we to proceed when
the underpinning foundations of the Rule of Law and the governing principles of
Peace, Order, and Good Government have been gutted by Cultural Marxist
Revolutionaries who are deliberately altering the very nature of Canada’s legal
system and democracy by means of identity politics? That is the very question I
am posing to you. Obviously, this channel exists to address these very issues.
It is my concerted opinion that only God Himself can buttress such a righteous
and just system. The very kind of government our ancestors pursued who risked
their very lives and fortunes in this pursuit. The call to restore limited constitutional
government under God falls upon us if we are to be found worthy of the inheritance
we received from those who struggled mightily against unjust and illiberal
tyranny. The Bible has several passages that speak to God's view on unjust
rulers:
1. **Proverbs 29:2**: "When the righteous increase,
the people rejoice, But when a wicked man rules, people groan."¹
2. **Proverbs 28:15**: "Like a roaring lion and a
rushing bear Is a wicked ruler over a poor people."¹
3. **Isaiah 10:1**: "Woe to those who enact evil
statutes And to those who constantly record unjust decisions."¹
4. **Micah 7:3**: "Concerning evil, both hands do it
well. The prince asks, also the judge, for a bribe."¹
5. **Isaiah 1:23**: "Your rulers are rebels And
companions of thieves; Everyone loves a bribe And chases after rewards. They do
not defend the orphan, Nor does the widow’s plea come before them."¹
6. **Ezekiel 22:27**: "Her princes within her are like
wolves tearing the prey, by shedding blood and destroying lives in order to get
dishonest gain."¹
7. **Isaiah 3:14**: "The Lord enters into judgment
with the elders and princes of His people, “It is you who have devoured the
vineyard; The plunder of the poor is in your houses."¹
These verses highlight God's disapproval of unjust rulers
and the negative impact they have on their people. They serve as a reminder of
the importance of justice and righteousness in leadership. Without God there
can be no peace, order, and good government. The laws and traditions our
ancestors bequeathed us are a direct result of their faith in a just God who despises
wicked rulers who take bribes and govern by tyranny. Which is why the Cultural
Marxists have taken direct aim at the traditions we inherited to undermine the
very foundations of peace, order, and good government. I say that once again it
is time for another, “Glorious Revolution” in our time to restore good government
under an Almighty and just God!
Source: Conversation with Bing, 2023-12-10
(1) 8 Bible Verses about Wicked Rulers - Online Bible.
https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/topics/Wicked-Rulers.
(2) Luke 18:6 And the Lord said, "Listen to the words
of the unjust judge.. https://biblehub.com/luke/18-6.htm.
(3) Isaiah 10 TLB - Woe to unjust judges and to those who -
Bible Gateway.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isaiah%2010&version=TLB.
No comments:
Post a Comment